Locking Nail versus Plate Fixation in Calcaneal Fractures: Brief report on a Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Characteristics and Radiographic Correction Potential.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Minimal and limited access techniques are gaining increasing interest for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The ideal treatment method is however still debated and largely based on individual case factors and surgeon experience. Aim of this study was thus to compare the treatment characteristics and radiographic correction potential of a locking nail system with a sinus tarsi approach to plate fixation via an extended lateral approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 39 cases of patients with calcaneal fractures that received primary fracture treatment for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures between July 2017 and March 2020. Patient characteristics, time to surgery, time to discharge, OR time and the correction achieved were analyzed and comparative statistics performed. RESULTS In total 19 patients treated with the locking nail and 20 patients treated with plate fixation were analyzed. Patient age and fracture severity according to the Sanders classification were comparable between the groups. Overall surgical time, as well as the achieved reduction was equal between both groups. Time to surgery, as well as time from surgery to discharge was significantly shorter in the locking nail group. 2 additional soft tissue procedures were necessary in the extended lateral approach group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The results with the locking calcaneus nail and sinus tarsi approach suggest, that similar treatment results can be achieved as with plate osteosynthesis and an extended lateral approach. Soft tissue management, as well as pre- and postoperative timing and discharge management can be improved with the nail. Further controlled trials comparing the longterm outcome between the treatment options are needed. Key words: calcaneus fracture, sinus tarsi approach, calcaneal nail, C-Nail.

Weight-Bearing Restrictions after Acetabular Fracture, Necessity or False Hope? A Brief Observational Study.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Most common postoperative treatment recommendations after acetabulum fractures suggest at least 6 weeks of postoperative partial or non weight-bearing. To protect the osteosynthetic construct this surgically set weight-bearing limit is trained by physical therapy. Aim of our analysis was to determine the free field patient compliance to these weight-bearing restrictions and observe their influence on the early postoperative radiographic imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients after surgical treatment of an acetabulum fracture were included in our analysis. Every patient was instructed to maintain a 20 kg weight-bearing limit for 6 weeks. Postoperative weight-bearing was continuously monitored during this time with a pressure measuring insole. Maximum weight-bearing per day was recorded and maintenance of reduction assessed after this time. RESULTS In total 10 patients were included into the study. Only 1 patient stayed within the weight-bearing limit during the analysis. Maximum weight-bearing as high as 110 kg was recorded. All patients maintained postoperative reduction at the 6 week timepoint. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Despite regular physical therapy training compliance to the generally accepted weight-bearing limits was low. Regardless of the non-compliance the radiographic outcome remained unchanged. Further analysis on the use of permissive weightbearing aftercare regimes are warranted. Key words: weight-bearing, acetabulum fracture, compliance.

[Periprosthetic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients]. / Die periprothetische Azetabulumfraktur des geriatrischen Patienten.

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients are rare injuries; however, the incidence is increasing because of the current demographic developments. For diagnosis of periprosthetic acetabular fractures, conventional X­ray images are regularly complemented by computed tomography (CT). For exclusion of loosening of the prosthesis more advanced techniques, such as single photon emission CT (SPECT/CT) are applied. In addition to classification of periprosthetic acetabular fractures by the traditional system of Letournel there are several other classification systems, which take into account the etiology of the fracture and the stability of the prosthesis. While, under certain circumstances conservative treatment of periprosthetic acetabular fractures is possible, operative treatment often requires extensive surgical procedures to restore the stability of the acetabulum as a support for the cup of the prosthesis. Besides the traditional techniques of acetabular osteosynthesis, special revision systems, augmentations and allografts are used for the reconstruction of periprosthetic acetabular fractures. To determine a therapeutic regimen patient-specific preconditions as well as fracture pattern and type of prosthesis need to be taken into account. In the literature there are several algorithms, which are aimed at supporting the attending physician in making the correct decision for the treatment of periprosthetic acetabular fractures. In cases of periprosthetic acetabular fractures even experienced surgeons are faced with great challenges. Thus, treatment should be carried out in specialized centers.