RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the past decade, major developments have improved the survival of patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). About 20% - 50% of patients with NSCLC present with oligometastases at diagnosis. For this group of patients, it seems that an increase in survival would justify aggressive local therapies. The development of minimally invasive surgery and advanced radiotherapy techniques like stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) makes local control possible for selected patients with metastatic NSCLC. The advantage of SBRT over surgery is that it is a non-invasive technique, with minimum side effects, and is more suitable for fragile and elderly patients, non-candidates for surgery, or patients who refuse surgery. AIM: The purpose of this review is to summarize the latest scientific evidence on the management of oligometastatic NSCLC, focusing on the role of radiotherapy. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: The initial treatment recommended for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC is systemic therapy. Patients should be considered for radical treatment to both the primary tumor and oligometastases. Aggressive local therapy comprises surgery and/or definitive radiotherapy such as SRS or SBRT, and may be preceded or followed by systemic treatment. Recent clinical evidence from Phase II trials reports benefits in terms of PFS in patients with good performance status and long disease-free periods, with good response to systemic therapy, especially in EGFR wild-type tumors. Phase I and II trials have shown that radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy can improve tumor response rate and possibly overall survival. The recommendation is also to include OM patients in ongoing clinical trials.
RESUMO
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the molecular subtype profiles of male breast cancer (MBC) and subsequent clinical outcome using a validated 6-marker immunohistochemical panel. METHODS: A total of 43 cases of MBC were examined retrospectively using a semiquantitative immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2), epidermal growth factor receptor and cytokeratin 5/6. Patients were classified into the following categories: luminal A, luminal B, Her2-positive or basal-like subtypes. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 63 years (r: 32-89). The predominant histology was invasive ductal carcinoma (91%). Only 1 patient had advanced breast cancer at diagnosis. Ninety-three percent were ER-positive and 84% were PR-positive. Two patients had tumors that were ER- and PR-negative. The distribution of tumor molecular subtypes was 19 (44%) luminal A, 22 (51%) luminal B and 2 (5%) basal-like. The Her2-positive tumor subtype was not identified. The clinicopathological characteristics did not differ significantly between tumor subtypes A and B. There were no significant differences in 6-year disease-free survival (74 vs. 82%, p = 0.77) or overall survival (74 vs. 82%, p = 0.69) between luminal A and luminal B subtypes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The most common subtypes in our cohort of MBC were luminal B followed by luminal A, and no differences were found between both tumor subtypes in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics and patient outcome.
