Influence of vitamin D status on the effect of statins on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess whether the association between statin use and bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers is modulated by serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels in postmenopausal women. Design, Participants, and Settings: Approximately 1422 postmenopausal women were recruited from the Camargo Cohort after excluding those with any known medical disorder or drug that might affect bone metabolism. Participants were categorized into four groups: 25OHD levels of 20 ng/mL or less and not taking statins (group 1; n = 492); 25OHD levels greater than 20 ng/mL and on statins (group 2; n = 143); 25OHD levels of 20 ng/mL or less and using statins (group 3; n = 112); and 2OHD levels greater than 20 ng/mL and non-statin use (group 4; n = 675). Multivariate analyses were performed to compare BMD and bone turnover markers between groups. RESULTS: Women in group 2 had an adjusted femoral neck and total hip BMD higher than women in group 1 (P < .0001 and P = .003, respectively). A trend toward a significant difference was observed regarding lumbar BMD (P = .08). Serum aminoterminal propeptide of type 1 collagen and C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen levels were lower in group 2 than in group 1, in crude and adjusted models, although only serum C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen difference was significant (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Women on statins and serum 25OHD levels above 20 ng/mL have greater BMD and less bone resorption than those without either of the factors. Differences, however, are not significant in women with only one of them. Vitamin D and statins seem to interact positively in their effects on bone metabolism.

Bone mineral density in statin users: a population-based analysis from a Spanish cohort.

We studied 2,315 subjects (1,422 women and 893 men) from the Camargo Cohort and analyzed the differences in BMD between statin or non-statin users. We also studied effects of the type of statin, dose, pharmacokinetic properties, and length of treatment on bone mineral density (BMD). Of the subjects, 478 (21 %) were taking statins (256 women and 222 men). Overall, they had higher BMD than non-users (p < 0.0001). In adjusted multivariate models, women taking statins had higher BMD at femoral neck (p = 0.002) and total hip (p = 0.04) than non- users. No differences were found in men. Women taking simvastatin had higher increases in BMD than non-statin users at femoral neck (p = 0.02) and total hip (p = 0.009), those taking fluvastatin had lower BMD values at lumbar spine (p = 0.028), and those receiving lovastatin had higher increases at femoral neck (p = 0.006). In men, only atorvastatin was associated with higher femoral neck BMD than non-statin use (p = 0.029). Comparing with non-statin users, only women receiving lipophilic statins had greater BMD at femoral neck (p = 0.003). According to drug potency, women on high- or lower-potency agents showed higher BMD values at femoral neck than non-users (p = 0.028 and 0.022, respectively). In men, only high-potency statins were associated with higher femoral neck BMD than non-use (p = 0.021). No differences between dose or length of statin therapy were noted regarding BMD in either sex. In summary, in a large population-based cohort, women on statins had higher BMD at the hip than non-users. Overall, this increase in BMD was more evident in subjects on lipophilic or high-potency statins.

Bone turnover markers in statin users: a population-based analysis from the Camargo Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of statin use on bone turnover markers (BTM), in participants from a large population-based cohort. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study that included 2431 subjects (1401 women and 930 men) from the Camargo Cohort. We analyzed the differences in serum BTM between statin or non-statin users, by means of a generalized linear model, adjusted for a wide set of covariates and stratified by diabetes status. We also studied the effect of the type of statin, dose, pharmacokinetic properties, and length of treatment, on BTM. RESULTS: Five hundred subjects (21%) were taking statins (273 women and 227 men). Overall, they had lower levels of aminoterminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) than non-users (p<0.0001). BTM levels were significantly lower in diabetic women using statins, than in female non-statin users with diabetes. In men, we found similar results, but only for CTX. All the statins users had lower levels of BTM than non-users, except subjects taking fluvastatin that showed slightly higher values. In the whole sample, no differences between dose or drug-potency were noted regarding BTM. When comparing with non-statin users, only subjects taking lipophilic statins had lower BTM levels (p<0.0001). Serum CTX levels were lower in women using statins for more than 3 vs. 1-3 years (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In a large population-based cohort, serum BTM were lower in participants taking statins than in non-users, and this effect was modulated by diabetes status. Overall, this decrease in BTM was more evident in subjects receiving the more lipophilic statins, especially when using for more than 3 years.