Risk Factors for Red Blood Cell Transfusions in Children Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with risk of red blood cell transfusions (RBCTs) following pediatric cardiac catheterizations. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a review of all pediatric cardiac catheterizations from 2012 to 2017. The primary endpoint was RBCT within 72 hours of pediatric cardiac catheterization. Patient and procedural factors were reviewed. Generalized linear modelling was performed to describe interactions among relevant risk factors. RESULTS: In total, 831 RBCTs occurred within 72 hours of 6028 pediatric cardiac catheterizations (13.8%). Univariate analysis revealed that the prevalence of RBCT was highest among infants (37.6% incidence of RBCT) and among those with higher estimated blood loss as a percent of blood volume (P = .03). Among infants, multivariate analysis revealed that weight (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.63-0.81), complex 2-ventricle (OR 3.14, 95% CI 2.18-4.57), and single ventricle status (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.42-8.01) were associated with risk of RBCT. Inpatient infants from intensive care (OR 4.74; 95% CI 3.49-6.49) or stepdown units (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.58-3.46) were at higher risk. Length of procedure (OR 2.57; 95% CI 2.03-3.26) and oxygen saturation (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99; P < .01) were also associated with RBCTs. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized infants with single ventricle or complex 2-ventricle anatomy are at highest risk of RBCT. Length of procedure, blood loss, and oxygen saturations are additional risk factors associated with RBCT. Operators should consider these factors when planning pediatric cardiac catheterizations, particularly when exposure to RBCT is undesirable.

Validation of a Prescreening Program for Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure.

Prior to initiation of a formal screening program, 30 % of patients referred for device closure of an atrial septal defect (ASD) at our institution had atrial septal anatomy which precluded ASD device closure. This resulted in inefficiencies in workflow, staff utilization, and inconvenience for families. Our objective was to report our experience with an ASD prescreening evaluation/protocol and family consultation process. This is a retrospective study of pediatric patients who underwent a comprehensive ASD prescreening evaluation at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta between January 2011 and June 2013. The comprehensive prescreening process included a detailed transthoracic echocardiogram and family consultation. Upon establishing a formal prescreening process for patients with secundum ASDs, 138 patients were screened for appropriateness of ASD device closure. At time of prescreening, 40 patients (29 %) were deemed not to be suitable candidates for device ASD closure. In 9 patients (6.5 %), after discussion with the interventionalist, parents elected to pursue surgical ASD closure. A total of 78 patients (56.5 %) underwent successful transcutaneous ASD device closure. In addition, there was a significant discrepancy in the reported size of the ASD between the outside evaluation and the ASD size discovered during the prescreening process. The addition of a prescreening program for transcatheter ASD closure has decreased the incidence of unsuccessful ASD closure from 30 to 10.3 %. The use of a comprehensive evaluation process for ASD device closure improves the likelihood of successful device implantation and permits adequate preprocedural counseling for the patient and family.