New Approaches for the Treatment of AML beyond the 7+3 Regimen: Current Concepts and New Approaches.

Fifty years have passed since the development of the first chemotherapy regimen for treating acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), with the approval in 1973 of the cytarabine daunorubicin (7+3) regimen. Until recently, patients diagnosed with AML had very limited treatment options and depended primarily on chemotherapy in combinations, doses, or schedules of the same drugs. Patients with advanced age, comorbidities, or relapsed or refractory disease were left with no effective options for treatment. New advances in the understanding of the biology and the molecular and genetic changes associated with leukemogenesis, as well as recent advances in drug development, have resulted in the introduction over the last few years of novel therapeutic agents and approaches to the treatment of AML as well as a new classification of the disease. In this article, we will discuss the new classification of AML; the mechanisms, actions, and indications of the new targeted therapies; the chemotherapy combinations; and the potential role of cellular therapies as new treatment options for this terrible disease.

Targeted IV busulfan and fludarabine followed by post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation rituximab demonstrate encouraging activity in CD20+ lymphoid malignancies without increased risk of infectious complications.

We examined pharmacokinetic-targeted IV busulfan (75-170 mg/m(2), with target AUC of 3500-6000 µmol min) and fludarabine (40 mg/m(2)) × 4 days with rituximab (t-IV Bu/Flu + rituximab) 375 mg/m(2) on days +1 and +8 followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in 19 patients (median age 56, range 35-68 years) with CD20+ lymphoid malignancies. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 15 and 12 days. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 58% (95% confidence interval, CI 39-85%), and chronic GVHD was 50% (95% CI 28-88%). With a median follow up of 7 (range 1-31) months, overall response was observed in 15, and stable or progressive disease in 4. Overall survival at 1 year was 67%. Engraftment, chimerism, and infectious complications did not differ significantly from a contemporaneous non-rituximab containing comparator group. The addition of rituximab 375 mg/m(2) to t-IV Bu/Flu does not appear to adversely affect engraftment, donor chimerism, or increase the risk of infectious complications.

Pentostatin as rescue therapy for glucocorticoid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite scientific advances in hematopoietic cell allografting, glucocorticoid-refractory acute (aGVHD) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) represent major sources of transplant-related morbidity and mortality. We aimed to characterize the activity of pentostatin as rescue therapy for refractory GVHD. MATERIAL/METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we examined the activity of pentostatin as rescue therapy of glucocorticoid-refractory acute and chronic GVHD. RESULTS: In 12 patients with advanced (overall aGVHD grade III/IV in 8/12) refractory aGVHD, overall response (ORR) was achieved in 6/12, and complete remission (CR) of aGVHD in 4/12 allowing additional rescue immunosuppressive agents. Median overall survival (OS) was 1.4 months (95% CI: 0.26-2.4). Causes of death included refractory aGVHD and infection. In 18 patients with refractory cGVHD (12/18 with severe cGVHD), pentostatin induced CR in 1/18, and partial response (PR) in 9/18. Activity was observed in all affected organs. The median decrease in glucocorticoid therapy over 24 months after pentostatin initiation for refractory cGVHD was 38% (range=0-100%). Median OS was 5 months (95% CI: 1.6 - NR). CONCLUSIONS: Allowing for the utilization of additional immune suppressive agents, this series suggests the activity of pentostatin as rescue therapy of refractory GVHD.

Rare benign breast tumor.

We report the case of a female patient with an incidental finding at routine mammography evaluation which consisted of a benign spindle cell tumor, namely Breast Myofibroblastoma. It is arranged in fascicles with interspersed broad bands of hyalinized collagen with variable immunohistochemical reactivity to desmin, vimentin, smooth muscle actin and CD 34. It is usually not reactive to cytokeratins and S-100 as seen in the myoepitheliomas. Recurrence of the lesion after excisional surgical procedure is not documented at medical literature. It is important to recognize the benign nature of this neoplasm to prevent extensive mutilating surgical procedures.