Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 223(6): 379-382, jun.- jul. 2023. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-221354

RESUMO

Objetivo Identificar dentro del grupo de pacientes de alto riesgo a aquellos que presentan más posibilidad de presentar inmunidad postvacunal insuficiente. Método Determinación de títulos de IgG frente a SARS-CoV-2 después de la dosis de recuerdo. Se clasificó la respuesta vacunal como negativa (títulos IgG <34 BAU/ml), indeterminada (títulos 34 - 259 BAU/ml) o positiva (≥260 BAU/ml). Resultados Se incluyeron 765 pacientes (31,25% de los vacunados): 54 (7,1%) en tratamiento con fármacos biológicos, 90 (11,8%) con enfermedad hematológica, 299 (39,1%) con patología oncológica, 304 (39,7%) con trasplante de órgano sólido y 18 (2,4%) con inmunosupresión por otros motivos. Un total de 74 pacientes (9,7%) tuvieron una serología negativa y 45 (5,9%) obtuvieron títulos indeterminados. Por grupo diagnóstico, los pacientes con mayor porcentaje de serología negativa o indeterminada fueron pacientes bajo tratamiento con fármacos biológicos (55,6%, fundamentalmente a expensas de antiCD20), hematológicos (35,4%) y los trasplantados (17,8%, principalmente pulmón y riñón). Los pacientes oncológicos y otros pacientes inmunosuprimidos tuvieron buena respuesta vacunal. Conclusión Los pacientes tratados con fármacos antiCD20, los hematológicos y los trasplantados (fundamentalmente de pulmón y riñón) presentaron mayor riesgo de no desarrollar inmunidad postvacunal. Es fundamental su identificación de cara a individualizar y mejorar su manejo (AU)


Objective To determine which patients within the high-risk group are most likely to have insufficient post-vaccination immunity. Methods Determination of IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 after the booster dose. Vaccine response was categorized as negative (IgG titers <34 BAU/ml), indeterminate (titers 34 - 259 BAU/ml) or positive (≥ 260 BAU/ml). Results 765 patients were included (31.25% of those vaccinated). 54 (7.1%) on treatment with biologics, 90 (11.8%) with hematologic disease, 299 (39.1%) with oncologic pathology, 304 (39.7%) with solid organ transplant and 18 (2.4%) with immunosuppression for other reasons. 74 patients (9.7%) had negative serology and 45 (5.9%) had indeterminate titers. By diagnostic group, the patients with the highest proportion of negative or indeterminate serology were patients with biologic treatment (55.6%, mainly at expense of antiCD20), hematologic (35.4%) and transplant patients (17.8%, mainly lung and kidney). Oncology and other immunosuppressed patients had a favorable response to vaccination. Conclusion Patients treated with antiCD20 drugs, hematologic patients and transplanted patients (mainly lung and kidney) have a higher risk of not achieving post-vaccination immunity. It is essential to identify them in order to individualize and optimize their management (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia
2.
Rev Clin Esp ; 223(6): 379-382, 2023.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37266519

RESUMO

Objective: To determine which patients within the high-risk group are most likely to have insufficient post-vaccination immunity. Methods: Determination of IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 after the booster dose. Vaccine response was categorized as negative (IgG titers < 34 BAU/ml), indeterminate (titers 34 - 259 BAU/ml) or positive (≥ 260 BAU/ml). Results: 765 patients were included (31.25% of those vaccinated). 54 (7.1%) on treatment with biologics, 90 (11.8%) with hematologic disease, 299 (39.1%) with oncologic pathology, 304 (39.7%) with solid organ transplant and 18 (2.4%) with immunosuppression for other reasons. 74 patients (9.7%) had negative serology and 45 (5.9%) had indeterminate titers. By diagnostic group, the patients with the highest proportion of negative or indeterminate serology were patients with biologic treatment (55.6%, mainly at expense of antiCD20), hematologic (35.4%) and transplant patients (17.8%, mainly lung and kidney). Oncology and other immunosuppressed patients had a favorable response to vaccination. Conclusion: Patients treated with antiCD20 drugs, hematologic patients and transplanted patients (mainly lung and kidney) have a higher risk of not achieving post-vaccination immunity. It is essential to identify them in order to individualize and optimize their management.

3.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 223(6): 379-382, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37146747

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine which patients within the high-risk group are most likely to have insufficient post-vaccination immunity. METHODS: Determination of IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 after the booster dose. Vaccine response was categorized as negative (IgG titers < 34 BAU/ml), indeterminate (titers 34-259 BAU/ml) or positive (≥260 BAU/ml). RESULTS: 765 patients were included (31.25% of those vaccinated). 54 (7.1%) on treatment with biologics, 90 (11.8%) with hematologic disease, 299 (39.1%) with oncologic pathology, 304 (39.7%) with solid organ transplant and 18 (2.4%) with immunosuppression for other reasons. 74 patients (9.7%) had negative serology and 45 (5.9%) had indeterminate titers. By diagnostic group, the patients with the highest proportion of negative or indeterminate serology were patients with biologic treatment (55.6%, mainly at expense of antiCD20), hematologic (35.4%) and transplant patients (17.8%, mainly lung and kidney). Oncology and other immunosuppressed patients had a favorable response to vaccination. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with antiCD20 drugs, hematologic patients and transplanted patients (mainly lung and kidney) have a higher risk of not achieving post-vaccination immunity. It is essential to identify them in order to individualize and optimize their management.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Antivirais , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Imunoglobulina G
4.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 37(4): 208-215, 2022.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35125340

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The presence of symptoms after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is frequent and has an impact on patients' quality of life. The aim of this study is to assess the health-related quality of life of COVID-19 survivors and to ascertain which factors are related to worse results. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study has been performed, using, a telephone survey that was administered to all patients with COVID-19 from the first pandemic wave in our healthcare area 10months after the acute infection. Patients with dementia and nursing home residents were excluded. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D instrument and its índices EQ-VAS and EQ-Health Index. RESULTS: 443 answers were collected. Mean age was 54±16 and 38.4% of patients were male. The most affected domain was anxiety/depression (23.9% of patients) and mobility (16.5%). Mean global EQ-VAS score was 75.8±18.7, and mean EQ-Health Index was 0.884±0.174. Both VAS and Health Index scores were lower in females, patients older than 65 years, patients with comorbidities, and those who needed hospital admission during the acute infection. VAS scores in our sample were lower than in the general Spanish population, but similar to the scores in our region prior to the pandemic. Female sex, hospital admission, and a lower educational status were independently associated to lower EQ-Health Index scoring. CONCLUSION: While health self-perception is affected after COVID-19, this might not be directly related to the infection. There exist profiles of patients more prone to a worse quality of life in which interventions may be considered.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Qualidade de Vida , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2
5.
QJM ; 113(5): 330-335, 2020 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) admitted to hospital commonly have comorbidities. Few studies have attempted to determine factors prognostic of mortality in hospitalized AF patients with multimorbidity. AIM: To identify factors associated with mortality in hospitalized AF patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients with multimorbidity (≥2 chronic diseases), with or without AF, discharged from Lugo hospital (Spain) between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2015. Data were extracted from hospital medical records. RESULTS: Of 74 220 patients (170 978 hospitalizations), 52 939 had multimorbidity (14 181 had AF; 38 758 no AF) and were included in our study. Patients with AF were older (mean ± standard deviation 78.6 ± 10.0 vs. 71.9 ± 14.2 years) and had a higher mortality rate (27.1 vs. 20.5%) than those without AF. Gender (female), age, stroke and congestive heart failure (CHF), but not AF, were independently associated with mortality. AF significantly increased the mortality risk in women [relative risk (RR) 1.091; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.021-1.165; P = 0.010] and in those aged >80 years (RR 1.153; 95% CI, 1.1-1.2; P < 0.001). CHF independently increased the risk of mortality across all age groups (RR 1.496; 95% CI 1.422-1.574; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with AF have a higher mortality rate than those without AF. The prognostic significance of AF changes with age and gender while CHF is associated with the greatest risk of death.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Multimorbidade/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia
6.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 217(6): 309-314, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28460719

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of patients with auricular fibrillation (AF) in the hospital setting and their successive hospitalisations. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all hospital admissions in the medical area of hospital of Lugo between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2013. The data source was the centre's minimum basic data set. RESULTS: A total of 149,271 hospital admissions corresponding to 66,286 patients were recorded. Of the total, the percentage of admissions and patients with AF was 17.3% (25,870) and 18.9% (12,512), respectively. The patients with AF were characterized by a larger proportion of women (49.7 vs. 44.3%; P<.0001), advanced age (78.3 [DE 10.2] vs. 67.1 years [DE 17.9]; P<.0001), more chronic diseases (4.2 [DE 2.1] vs. 2.9 [DE 1.9]; P<.001), longer hospital stays (12.5 [DE 12.5] vs. 10.6 [DE 19.9] days; P<.0001) and a high rate of readmissions (3.0 [DE 2.75] vs. 2.1 [DE 2.28]; P<.001), with a progressive shortening of the time between hospitalisations. The department of internal medicine was responsible for the care of more than half of the patients with AF. The most common associated secondary diagnoses were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, other respiratory system diseases and arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: AF occurs in highly complex patients, who are mostly hospitalized in internal medicine departments, and is associated with a high rate of readmissions. We need to consider the diseases associated with AF for an overall approach to these patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...