Antioxidants reverse depression of the hypoxic ventilatory response by acetazolamide in man.

The carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide may have both inhibitory and stimulatory effects on breathing. In this placebo-controlled double-blind study we measured the effect of an intravenous dose (4 mg kg(-1)) of this agent on the acute isocapnic hypoxic ventilatory response in 16 healthy volunteers (haemoglobin oxygen saturation 83-85%) and examined whether its inhibitory effects on this response could be reversed by antioxidants (1 g ascorbic acid i.v. and 200 mg alpha-tocopherol p.o.). The subjects were randomly divided into an antioxidant (Aox) and placebo group. In the Aox group, acetazolamide reduced the mean normocapnic and hypercapnic hypoxic responses by 37% (P < 0.01) and 55% (P < 0.01), respectively, and abolished the O2-CO2 interaction, i.e. the increase in O2 sensitivity with rising Pco2. Antioxidants completely reversed this inhibiting effect on the normocapnic hypoxic response, while in hypercapnia the reversal was partial. In the placebo group, acetazolamide reduced the normo- and hypercapnic hypoxic responses by 33 and 47%, respectively (P < 0.01 versus control in both cases), and also abolished the O2-CO2 interaction. Placebo failed to reverse these inhibitory effects of acetazolamide in this group. We hypothesize that either an isoform of carbonic anhydrase may be involved in the regulation of the redox state in the carotid bodies or that acetazolamide and antioxidants exert independent effects on oxygen-sensing cells, in which both carbonic anhydrase and potassium channels may be involved. The novel findings of this study may have clinical implications, for example with regard to a combined use of acetazolamide and antioxidants at high altitude.

Antioxidants reverse reduction of the human hypoxic ventilatory response by subanesthetic isoflurane.

BACKGROUND: In subanesthetic concentrations, volatile anesthetics reduce the acute hypoxic response (AHR), presumably by a direct action on the carotid bodies but by an unknown molecular mechanism. To examine a possible involvement of reactive oxygen species or changes in redox state in this inhibiting effect, the authors studied the effect of antioxidants on the isoflurane-induced reduction of the AHR in humans. METHODS: In 10 volunteers, the authors studied the effect of antioxidants (intravenous ascorbic acid and oral alpha-tocopherol) on the reduction by isoflurane (0.12% end-tidal concentration) of the AHR on a 3-min isocapnic hypoxic stimulus (hemoglobin oxygen saturation 86 +/- 4%). All subjects participated in three separate sessions in which the effects of the antioxidants (session 1), placebo (session 2), and sham isoflurane plus antioxidants (session 3) were tested on the (sham) isoflurane-induced effect on the AHR. RESULTS: Isoflurane reduced the acute hypoxic response from 0.82 +/- 0.41 l . min . % to 0.49 +/- 0.23 l . min . % and from 0.89 +/- 0.43 l . min . % to 0.48 +/- 0.28 l . min . % in sessions 1 and 2, respectively (mean +/- SD; P < 0.05 vs. control). This reduction of the AHR was completely reversed by antioxidants (AHR = 0.76 +/- 0.39 l . min . %; not significantly different from control, session 1) but not by placebo in session 2 (AHR = 0.50 +/- 0.30 l . min . %; P < 005 vs. control). Sham isoflurane or antioxidants per se had no effect on the hypoxic response. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that isoflurane may depress the AHR by influencing the redox state of oxygen-sensing elements in the carotid bodies. This finding may have clinical implications for patients who are prone to recurrent hypoxic episodes, e.g., due to upper airway obstruction, in the postoperative period when low-dose isoflurane may persist in the body for some time.

Polymorphism of mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1:c.118A>G) does not protect against opioid-induced respiratory depression despite reduced analgesic response.

BACKGROUND: The effect of a single nucleotide polymorphism of the mu-opioid receptor at nucleotide position 118 (OPRM1:c.118A>G) was investigated on morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G)-induced analgesia and respiratory depression in a group of healthy volunteers. METHODS: Sixteen subjects of either sex received 0.4 mg/kg (n = 8) or 0.6 mg/kg M6G (n = 8). At regular time intervals, the isocapnic acute hypoxic ventilatory response, pain tolerance (derived from a transcutaneous electrical acute pain model), and arterial blood samples were obtained. Data acquisition continued for 14 h after drug infusion. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic sigmoid Emax models were applied to the respiratory and pain data. All collected data were analyzed using the statistical program NONMEM (San Francisco, CA). RESULTS: Four of the subjects were OPRM1:c.118GA heterozygotes, and the remainder of the subjects were OPRM1:c.118AA homozygotes. M6G analgesia: In contrast to analgesic responses in OPRM1:c.118AA homozygotes, responses were small and inconsistent in OPRM1:c.118GA heterozygotes and best described by the function Effect(t) = baseline (P < 0.01 vs. OPRM1:c.118AA homozygotes). Emax and C50 values in heterozygotes equaled 0.55 +/- 0.18 (or a 55% increase in current above baseline) and 161 +/- 42 ng/ml, respectively. M6G-induced respiratory depression: For the acute hypoxic response, neither Emax nor C50 (value = 282 +/- 72 ng/ml) differed between genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the OPRM1:c.118A>G polymorphism affects opioid analgesic and respiratory effects differentially. Despite reduced analgesic responses to M6G the OPRM1:c.118A>G single-nucleotide polymorphism does not protect against the toxic effects of the tested opioid. However, some caution in the interpretation of the data is needed because of the small sample size. Further studies are needed to explore the link between this polymorphism and respiratory/analgesic responses beyond the small human sample. In OPRM1:c.118AA homozygotes, the potency parameters differed by a factor of 2 for analgesic versus respiratory effect. In this respect, M6G differs favorably from morphine.

Response surface modeling of remifentanil-propofol interaction on cardiorespiratory control and bispectral index.

BACKGROUND: Since propofol and remifentanil are frequently combined for monitored anesthesia care, we examined the influence of the separate and combined administration of these agents on cardiorespiratory control and bispectral index in humans. METHODS: The effect of steady-state concentrations of remifentanil and propofol was assessed in 22 healthy male volunteer subjects. For each subject, measurements were obtained from experiments using remifentanil alone, propofol alone, and remifentanil plus propofol (measured arterial blood concentration range: propofol studies, 0-2.6 microg/ml; remifentanil studies, 0-2.0 ng/ml). Respiratory experiments consisted of ventilatory responses to three to eight increases in end-tidal Pco2 (Petco2). Invasive blood pressure, heart rate, and bispectral index were monitored concurrently. The nature of interaction was assessed by response surface modeling using a population approach with NONMEM. Values are population estimate plus or minus standard error. RESULTS: A total of 94 responses were obtained at various drug combinations. When given separately, remifentanil and propofol depressed cardiorespiratory variables in a dose-dependent fashion (resting V(i) : 12.6 +/- 3.3% and 27.7 +/- 3.5% depression at 1 microg/ml propofol and 1 ng/ml remifentanil, respectively; V(i) at fixed Petco of 55 mmHg: 44.3 +/- 3.9% and 57.7 +/- 3.5% depression at 1 microg/ml propofol and 1 ng/ml remifentanil, respectively; blood pressure: 9.9 +/- 1.8% and 3.7 +/- 1.1% depression at 1 microg/ml propofol and 1 ng/ml remifentanil, respectively). When given in combination, their effect on respiration was synergistic (greatest synergy observed for resting V(i)). The effects of both drugs on heart rate and blood pressure were modest, with additive interactions when combined. Over the dose range studied, remifentanil had no effect on bispectral index even when combined with propofol (inert interaction). CONCLUSIONS: These data show dose-dependent effects on respiration at relatively low concentrations of propofol and remifentanil. When combined, their effect on respiration is strikingly synergistic, resulting in severe respiratory depression.