Factors associated with early atrial fibrillation after ablation of common atrial flutter. A single centre prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of early atrial fibrillation (< or = 6 months) after ablation of common atrial flutter is of clinical significance. Variables predicting this evolution in ablated patients without a previous atrial fibrillation history have not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was: (1) to identify predictive factors of early atrial fibrillation (< or = 6 months) in the overall population following atrial flutter catheter ablation; (2) to identify predictive variables of early atrial fibrillation following (< or = 6 months) atrial flutter catheter ablation within a subgroup of patients without documented prior atrial fibrillation. METHODS: This study prospectively included 96 consecutive patients (age 65 +/- 13 years; 18 women) over a 12-month period. Their counterclockwise flutter was ablated by radiofrequency, by the same operator, with an 8-mm-tip catheter. Clinical, electrophysiological and echocardiographic data were collected and 27 variables were retained for analysis: age; gender; type of atrial flutter (permanent vs paroxysmal); symptom duration (months +/- SD); pre-ablation history of atrial fibrillation; structural heart disease; left ventricular ejection fraction (%); left atrial size (mm); cava--tricuspid isthmus dimension; septal isthmus dimension; systolic pulmonary pressure > or < or = 30 mmHg; right atrial area; left atrial area; isthmus block; number of radiofrequency applications (+/- SD); antiarrhythmic drugs at discharge; left ventricular diastolic diameter; left ventricular systolic diameter; left ventricular telediastolic volume; left ventricular telesystolic volume; A-wave velocity (cm . s(-1)); E-wave velocity (cm . s(-1)); E/A; isovolumetric relaxation time; E-wave deceleration time; significant mitral regurgitation and flutter cycle length (ms). RESULTS: Of the 96 consecutive ablated patients, early atrial fibrillation was documented in 16 patients (17%). Atrial fibrillation occurred 30 +/- 46 days (range 1 to 171 days) after ablation. Univariate analysis associated an early occurrence of atrial fibrillation with: atrial fibrillation history, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial size, left ventricular telesystolic volume, A-wave velocity, significant mitral regurgitation and flutter cycle length. Multivariate analysis using a Cox model found that the only independent predictors of early atrial fibrillation were left ventricular ejection fraction and pre-ablation history of atrial fibrillation. In the subgroup without prior atrial fibrillation history (n=63; 66%), the only independent predictor of early atrial fibrillation was the presence of a significant mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: In a subgroup of patients without atrial fibrillation history, 8% of patients revealed an early atrial fibrillation. Mitral regurgitation is a strong predictive factor of early atrial fibrillation occurrence with 80% sensitivity, 78% specificity and 98% negative predictive value. These data should be considered in post-ablation management.

Safe and effective placement of two bipolar silicone leads in the cephalic vein using a hydrophilic guidewire and a split introducer.

The cephalic vein (CV) is preferable to the subclavian vein for implanting permanent pacing leads because of fewer complications. Unfortunately, this access is unusable in a substantial number of patients. This prospective study evaluates a technique to increase CV access for the placement of two silicone bipolar leads used in DDD pulse generator implants. A standard cephalic cutdown was performed under local anesthesia and a hydrophilic guidewire (HGW) threaded in the CV. The first (ventricular) bipolar lead was then introduced and positioned. When possible, introduction of the second (atrial) lead followed the same direct access. A failed introduction led to a modified procedure (MP) relying on a "split" introducer (8-9 Fr Plastimed) advanced with a circular motion over the HGW, then removal of the dilator, removal of the HGW, insertion of the pacing lead into the sheath with placement in the right atrium, followed by sheath withdrawal. Over an 18-month period, 90 consecutive patients had DDD pacemakers implanted. The CV was accessible in 76 (84.5%) of 90 patients and the direct introduction of the ventricular lead was obtained in 74 (97.4%) of these. Atrialization proceeded as follows: direct access CV in 14 (18%) of 76 patients, MP access in 54 (71%) of 76 patients, and MP failure in 8 (11%) of 76 patients. Overall, this approach allowed cephalic dual insertion in 68 (89%) of 76 patients. In conclusion, the modified procedure presented in this study allows a dual catheterization with bipolar leads in 89% of patients when a CV is available. This significantly improves the success rate for dual bipolar lead implants in this configuration.