Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Atherosclerosis ; 242(1): 161-6, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26188540

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To determine the incremental diagnostic value of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume in addition to the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score for detecting hemodynamic significant coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: 122 patients (mean age 61 ± 10 years, 61% male) without a previous cardiac history underwent a non-contrast CT scan for calcium scoring and EAT volume measurements. Subsequently all patients underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in conjunction with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. A stenosis >90% and/or a FFR ≤0.80 were considered significant. Mean EAT volume and CACscore were 128 ± 51 cm(3) and 418 ± 704, respectively. The correlation between EAT volume and the CACscore was poor (r = 0.11, p = 0.24). Male gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.86, p = 0.01), CACscore ([cut-off value 100] OR 3.31, p = 0.003, and EAT volume ([cut-off value 92 cm(3)] OR 4.28, p = 0.01) were associated with flow-limiting disease. The multivariate model revealed that only male gender (OR 2.50, p = 0.045), CAC score (OR 3.60, p = 0.005), and EAT volume (OR 4.95, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of myocardial ischemia. Using the cut-off values of 100 (CAC score) and 92 cm(3) (EAT volume), sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy for detecting functionally relevant CAD as indicated by FFR were 71, 57, 77, 50 and 63% and 91, 29, 85, 44 and 52% for the CACscore and EAT volume, respectively. Adding EAT volume to the CAC score and cardiovascular risk factors did not enhance diagnostic performance for the detection of significant CAD (p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: EAT volume measurements have no diagnostic value beyond calcium scoring and cardiovascular risk factors in the detection of hemodynamic significant CAD.


Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Vasos Coronários/fisiopatologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Razão de Chances , Pericárdio , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcificação Vascular/fisiopatologia
2.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 42(10): 1562-73, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26054890

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been linked to coronary artery disease (CAD) and coronary microvascular dysfunction. However, its injurious effect may also impact the underlying myocardium. This study aimed to determine the impact of obesity on the quantitative relationship between left ventricular mass (LVM), EAT and coronary microvascular function. METHODS: A total of 208 (94 men, 45 %) patients evaluated for CAD but free of coronary obstructions underwent quantitative [(15)O]H2O hybrid positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging. Coronary microvascular resistance (CMVR) was calculated as the ratio of mean arterial pressure to hyperaemic myocardial blood flow. RESULTS: Obese patients [body mass index (BMI) > 25, n = 133, 64 % of total] had more EAT (125.3 ± 47.6 vs 93.5 ± 42.1 cc, p < 0.001), a higher LVM (130.1 ± 30.4 vs 114.2 ± 29.3 g, p < 0.001) and an increased CMVR (26.6 ± 9.1 vs 22.3 ± 8.6 mmHg×ml(-1)×min(-1)×g(-1), p < 0.01) as compared to nonobese patients. Male gender (ß = 40.7, p < 0.001), BMI (ß = 1.61, p < 0.001), smoking (ß = 6.29, p = 0.03) and EAT volume (ß = 0.10, p < 0.01) were identified as independent predictors of LVM. When grouped according to BMI status, EAT was only independently associated with LVM in nonobese patients. LVM, hypercholesterolaemia and coronary artery calcium score were independent predictors of CMVR. CONCLUSION: EAT volume is associated with LVM independently of BMI and might therefore be a better predictor of cardiovascular risk than BMI. However, EAT volume was not related to coronary microvascular function after adjustments for LVM and traditional risk factors.


Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/fisiopatologia , Circulação Coronária , Vasos Coronários/fisiopatologia , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Microvasos/fisiopatologia , Pericárdio/fisiopatologia , Adiposidade , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirculação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão , Radiografia , Cintilografia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...