[Folic acid fortification: prevention as well as promotion of cancer]. / Foliumzuurverrijking: zowel preventie als bevordering van kanker.

In many countries foods are fortified with folic acid to prevent neural-tube defects. Beneficial effects on cancer, cardiovascular diseases and dementia are also assumed. Fortification with folic acid is not allowed in The Netherlands, although exemption can be granted. As well as beneficial effects, harmful effects may also occur. In addition to masking vitamin-B12 deficiency, there is some evidence that folic acid may promote progression of established tumours in laboratory animals and humans. In addition, it has been hypothesized that fortification with folic acid may have further negative effects on cancer through genetic selection. Given the high prevalence of cancer, these potentially harmful effects should also be taken into account in the Dutch debate on the advantages and disadvantages of folic acid fortification.

Effect of bile type on the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants in an in vitro digestion model.

Soil ingestion is an important pathway of exposure for many nonvolatile contaminants for man and in particular for children. A fraction of the ingested contaminant may not dissociate from the soil particles during digestion in the gastrointestinal tract, and is thus not available for transport across the intestinal epithelium. In order to estimate the contaminant fraction that is mobilized from soil, i.e., the bioaccessible fraction, several in vitro digestion models have been developed. The currently existing digestion models display many differences. One aspect that may affect bioaccessibility and may induce differences between digestion models is the bile that is used. Often freeze-dried bile of animal origin is preferred to purified bile salts. However, also the animal origin of bile may give rise to differences in bioaccessibility because bile composition appears to be species dependent. In the present study, we compared the bioaccessibility of benzo[a]pyrene, arsenic, cadmium, and lead of four different soils after digestion with ox bile from two different suppliers, pig bile, and chicken bile. Bioaccessibility appeared to vary amongst the different soils and contaminants. Only chicken bile increased the bioaccessibility of lead and cadmium significantly and relevantly for one of four soils. For chicken bile, the bioaccessibility of lead was 3-5.5 times greater than for the other bile types and the bioaccessibility of cadmium was 1.5 times greater. In all other cases, the bioaccessibility differences were less than 10%, which is considered irrelevant for risk assessment purposes.

Development of an in vitro digestion model for estimating the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants.

Soil ingestion can be a major route of human exposure to many immobile soil contaminants. The present risk assessment is based on toxicity studies in which contaminants are typically ingested in liquid or food matrices. The difference in bioavailability of contaminants ingested in a soil matrix is not taken into account. To become bioavailable, contaminants first need to become bioaccessible, i.e., they must be mobilized from the soil during digestion. Soil contaminants may be less bioaccessible than contaminants from liquid or food, so that the risks can be overestimated. This article describes the development of an in vitro human digestion model that is physiologically based. It can be used as a tool to assess bioaccessibility. We explain the rationale behind the experimental design of the model. We address the aspects of the simulated compartments of the gastrointestinal tract, temperature, soil-to-fluid ratio, ratio of digestive juices, transit times, centrifugation, pH values, mixing, constituents and their concentrations, and bile. The optimized in vitro digestion model was applied in a case study. The bioaccessibility of lead in pottery flakes with glazing was determined and compared to the bioaccessibility of lead in the soil from which the pottery flakes were removed. The data indicate that pottery flake lead is considerably less bioaccessible (0.3 +/- 0.2%) than lead in soil without pottery flakes (42-66% at the same site, and 28-73% at other sites in the same town). Furthermore, bioaccessibility values of lead in soil appear to be less than calculated bioaccessibility values for dietary lead (which are based on the criterion used by the Dutch risk assessment and on literature absorption data). This indicates that accounting for the matrix of ingestion can affect the exposure assessment for lead. The in vitro digestion model is a promising tool for studying the effect of the ingestion matrix on bioaccessibility.