AAPM Task Group Report 261: Comprehensive quality control methodology and management of dental and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems specifically designed and manufactured for dental, maxillofacial imaging (MFI) and otolaryngology (OLR) applications have been commercially available in the United States since 2001 and have been in widespread clinical use since. Until recently, there has been a lack of professional guidance available for medical physicists about how to assess and evaluate the performance of these systems and about the establishment and management of quality control (QC) programs. The owners and users of dental CBCT systems may have only a rudimentary understanding of this technology, including how it differs from conventional multidetector CT (MDCT) in terms of acceptable radiation safety practices. Dental CBCT systems differ from MDCT in several ways and these differences are described. This report provides guidance to medical physicists and serves as a basis for stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding how to manage and develop a QC program for dental CBCT systems. It is important that a medical physicist with experience in dental CBCT serves as a resource on this technology and the associated radiation protection best practices. The medical physicist should be involved at the pre-installation stage to ensure that a CBCT room configuration allows for a safe and efficient workflow and that structural shielding, if needed, is designed into the architectural plans. Acceptance testing of new installations should include assessment of mechanical alignment of patient positioning lasers and x-ray beam collimation and benchmarking of essential image quality performance parameters such as image uniformity, noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), spatial resolution, and artifacts. Several approaches for quantifying radiation output from these systems are described, including simply measuring the incident air-kerma (Kair) at the entrance surface of the image receptor. These measurements are to be repeated at least annually as part of routine QC by the medical physicist. QC programs for dental CBCT, at least in the United States, are often driven by state regulations, accreditation program requirements, or manufacturer recommendations.

Evaluation of image quality of a novel computed tomography metal artifact management technique on an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Artefacts caused by dental amalgam implants present a common challenge in computed tomography (CT) and therefore treatment planning dose calculations. The goal was to perform a quantitative image quality analysis of our Artifact Management for Proton Planning (AMPP) algorithm which used gantry tilts for managing metal artefacts on Head and Neck (HN) CT scans and major vendors' commercial approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Metal artefact reduction (MAR) algorithms were evaluated using an anthropomorphic phantom with a removable jaw for the acquisition of images with and without (baseline) metal artifacts. AMPP made use of two angled CT scans to generate one artifact-reduced image set. The MAR algorithms from four vendors were applied to the images with artefacts and the analysis was performed with respective baselines. Planar HU difference maps and volumetric HU differences were analyzed. RESULTS: AMPP algorithm outperformed all vendors' commercial approaches in the elimination of artefacts in the oropharyngeal region, showing the lowest percent of pixels outside +- 20 HU criteria, 4%; whereas those in the MAR-corrected images ranged from 26% to 67%. In the region of interest within the affected slices, the commercial MAR algorithms showed inconsistent performance, whereas the AMPP algorithm performed consistently well throughout the phantom's posterior region. CONCLUSIONS: A novel MAR algorithm was evaluated and compared to four commercial algorithms using an anthropomorphic phantom. Unanimously, the analysis showed the AMPP algorithm outperformed vendors' commercial approaches, showing the potential to be broadly implemented, improve visualizations in patient anatomy and provide accurate HU information.

Dosimetric impact of commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms and a novel in-house algorithm for proton therapy of head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the dosimetric impact of all major commercial vendors' metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms to one another, as well as to a novel in-house technique (AMPP) using an anthropomorphic head phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The phantom was an Alderson phantom, modified to allow for artifact-filled and baseline (no artifacts) computed tomography (CT) scans using teeth capsules made with metal amalgams or bone-equivalent materials. It also included a cylindrical insert that was accessible from the bottom of the neck and designed to introduce soft tissue features into the phantom that were used in the analysis. The phantom was scanned with the metal teeth in place using each respective vendor's MAR algorithm: OMAR (Philips), iMAR (Siemens), SEMAR (Canon), and SmartMAR (GE); the AMPP algorithm was designed in-house. Uncorrected and baseline (bone-equivalent teeth) image sets were also acquired using a Siemens scanner. Proton spot scanning treatment plans were designed on the baseline image set for five targets in the phantom. Once optimized, the proton beams were copied onto the different artifact-corrected image sets, with no reoptimization of the beams' parameters, to evaluate dose distribution differences in the different MAR-corrected and -uncorrected image sets. Dose distribution differences were evaluated by comparing dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics, including planning target volume D95 and clinical target volume D99 coverages, V100, D0.03cc, and heterogeneity indexes, along with a qualitative and water equivalent thickness (WET) analysis. RESULTS: Uncorrected CT metal artifacts and commercial MAR algorithms negatively impacted the proton dose distributions of all five target shapes and locations in an inconsistent manner, sometimes overdosing by as much as 11.1% (D0.03) or underdosing by as much as 11.7% (V100) the planning target volumes. The AMPP-corrected images, however, provided dose distributions that consistently agreed with the baseline dose distribution. The dosimetry results also suggest that the commercial MAR algorithms' performances varied more with target location and less with target shape. Once relocated further from the metal, the target showed dose distributions that agreed more with the baseline for all commercial solutions, improving the overdosing by as much as 6%, implying inadequate HU correction from commercial MAR algorithms. In comparison to the baseline, HU profile shapes were considerably altered by commercial algorithms and reference values showed differences that represent stopping power percentage differences of 2.7-10%. The AMPP algorithm plans showed the smallest WET differences with the baseline (0.06 cm on average), while the commercial image sets created differences that ranged from 0.11 to 0.54 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography metal artifacts negatively impacted proton dose distributions on all five targets analyzed. The commercial MAR solutions performed inconsistently throughout all targets compared to the metal-free baseline. A lack of CTV coverage and an increased number of hotspots were observed throughout all commercial solutions. Dose distribution errors were related to the proximity to the artifacts, demonstrating the inability of commercial techniques to adequately correct severe artifacts. In contrast, AMPP consistently showed dose distributions that best matched the baseline, likely because it makes use of accurate HU information, as opposed to interpolated data like commercial algorithms.

Development of a stereoscopic CT metal artifact management algorithm using gantry angle tilts for head and neck patients.

Dental amalgams are a common source of artifacts in head and neck (HN) images. Commercial artifact reduction techniques have been offered, but are substantially ineffectual at reducing artifacts from dental amalgams, can produce additional artifacts, provide inaccurate HU information, or require extensive computation time, and thus offer limited clinically utility. The goal of this work was to define and validate a novel algorithm and provide a phantom-based testing as proof of principle. An initial clinical comparison to a vendor's current solution was also performed. The algorithm uses two-angled CT scans in order to generate a single image set with minimal artifacts posterior to the metal implants. The algorithm was evaluated using a phantom simulating a HN patient with dental fillings. Baseline (no artifacts) geometrical measurements of the phantom were taken in the anterior-posterior, left-right, and superior-inferior directions and compared to the metal-corrected images using our algorithm to evaluate possible distortion from application of the algorithm. Mean HU numbers were also compared between the baseline scan and corrected image sets. A similar analysis was performed on the vendor's algorithm for comparison. The algorithm developed in this work successfully preserved the image geometry and HU and corrected the CT metal artifacts in the region posterior to the metal. The average total distortion for all gantry angles in the AP, LR, and SI directions was 0.17, 0.12, and 0.14 mm, respectively. The HU measurements showed significant consistency throughout the different reconstructed images when compared to the baseline image sets. The vendor's algorithm also showed no geometrical distortion but performed inferiorly in the HU number analysis compared to our technique. Our novel metal artifact management algorithm, using CT gantry angle tilts, provides a promising technique for clinical management of metal artifacts from dental amalgam.

Estimating patient water equivalent diameter from CT localizer images - A longitudinal and multi-institutional study of the stability of calibration parameters.

PURPOSE: Water equivalent diameter (WED) is a robust patient-size descriptor. Localizer-based WED estimation is less sensitive to truncation errors resulting from limited field of view, and produces WED estimates at different locations within one localizer radiograph, prior to the initiation of axial scans. This method is considered difficult to implement by the clinical community due to the necessary calibration between localizer pixel values (LPV) and attenuation, and the unknown stability of calibration results across scanners and over time. We investigated the stability of calibration results across 25 computed tomography (CT) scanners from three medical centers, and their stability over 3 âˆ¼ 29 months for 14 of those scanners. METHODS: Localizer and axial images of ACR and body computed tomography dose index phantoms were acquired, using routine clinical techniques (120 kV and lateral localizers) on each of the 25 CT scanners: 8 GE scanners (CT750HD, VCT, and Revolution), 8 Siemens scanners (Definition AS, Force, Flash, and Edge), 5 Canon scanners (Aquilion-One, Aquilion-Prime80, and Aquilion-64), and 4 Philips scanners (iCT 256, iQon, and Ingenuity). By associating axial images with the corresponding localizer lines, the relationship between the scaled water equivalent area (WEA) and averaged LPV were established through regression analysis. RESULTS: Linear relationships between the scaled WEA and the averaged LPV were observed in all 25 CT scanners ( R 2 > 0.999 ). Calibration parameters were similar for CT scanners from the same vendor: the coefficients of variation (COV) were ≤ 1% in all four vendor groups for the calibration slope, and < 7% for the intercept. By analyzing the deviation of WED resulted from errors in the calibration slope or intercept alone, we derived the tolerance ranges for the slope or intercept for a given WED error level. The variation of slope and intercept from different CT scanners of the same vendor introduced <±2.5% error in the estimated WED for subjects of 20 and 30-cm WED. The calibration parameters remained stable over time, with the maximum deviations all within the boundary values that introduce ±2.5% error in the estimated WED for subjects of 20 and 30-cm WED. CONCLUSIONS: The stability in calibration results among CT scanners of the same vendor and over time demonstrated the feasibility of implementing WED estimation for routine clinical use.

Report of AAPM Task Group 162: Software for planar image quality metrology.

PURPOSE: The AAPM Task Group 162 aimed to provide a standardized approach for the assessment of image quality in planar imaging systems. This report offers a description of the approach as well as the details of the resultant software bundle to measure detective quantum efficiency (DQE) as well as its basis components and derivatives. METHODS: The methodology and the associated software include the characterization of the noise power spectrum (NPS) from planar images acquired under specific acquisition conditions, modulation transfer function (MTF) using an edge test object, the DQE, and effective DQE (eDQE). First, a methodological framework is provided to highlight the theoretical basis of the work. Then, a step-by-step guide is included to assist in proper execution of each component of the code. Lastly, an evaluation of the method is included to validate its accuracy against model-based and experimental data. RESULTS: The code was built using a Macintosh OSX operating system. The software package contains all the source codes to permit an experienced user to build the suite on a Linux or other *nix type system. The package further includes manuals and sample images and scripts to demonstrate use of the software for new users. The results of the code are in close alignment with theoretical expectations and published results of experimental data. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology and the software package offered in AAPM TG162 can be used as baseline for characterization of inherent image quality attributes of planar imaging systems.

Quantification of the Effect of Shuttling on Computed Tomography Perfusion Parameters by Investigation of Aortic Inputs on Different Table Positions From Shuttle-Mode Scans of Lung and Liver Tumors.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of shuttling on computed tomography perfusion (CTp) parameters derived from shuttle-mode body CT images using aortic inputs from different table positions. METHODS: Axial shuttle-mode CT scans were acquired from 6 patients (10 phases, 2 nonoverlapping table positions 1.4 seconds apart) after contrast agent administration. Artifacts resulting from the shuttling motion were corrected with nonrigid registration before computing CTp maps from 4 aortic levels chosen from the most superior and inferior slices of each table position scan. The effect of shuttling on CTp parameters was estimated by mean differences in mappings obtained from aortic inputs in different table positions. Shuttling effect was also quantified using 95% limits of agreement of CTp parameter differences within-table and between-table aortic positions from the interaortic mean CTp values. RESULTS: Blood flow, permeability surface, and hepatic arterial fraction differences were insignificant (P > 0.05) for both within-table and between-table comparisons. The 95% limits of agreement for within-table blood volume (BV) value deviations obtained from lung tumor regions were less than 4.7% (P = 0.18) compared with less than 12.2% (P = 0.003) for between-table BV value deviations. The 95% limits of agreement of within-table deviations for liver tumor regions were less than 1.9% (P = 0.55) for BV and less than 3.2% (P = 0.23) for mean transit time, whereas between-table BV and mean transit time deviations were less than 11.7% (P < 0.01) and less than 14.6% (P < 0.01), respectively. Values for normal liver tissue regions were concordant. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography perfusion parameters acquired from aortic levels within-table positions generally yielded higher agreement than mappings obtained from aortic levels between-table positions indicating differences due to shuttling effect.

Characterization of Continuous and Pulsed Emission modes of a Hybrid Micro Focus X-ray Source for Medical Imaging Applications.

The aim of this study was to quantitatively characterize a micro focus x-ray tube that can operate in both continuous and pulsed emission modes. The micro focus x-ray source (Model L9181-06, Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan) has a varying focal spot size ranging from 16-50 µm as the source output power changes from 10-39 W. We measured the source output, beam quality, focal spot sizes, kV accuracy, spectra shapes and spatial resolution. Source output was measured using an ionization chamber for various tube voltages (kVs) with varying current (µA) and distances. The beam quality was measured in terms of half value layer (HVL), kV accuracy was measured with a non-invasive kV meter, and the spectra was measured using a compact integrated spectrometer system. The focal spot sizes were measured using a slit method with a CCD detector with a pixel pitch of 22 µm. The spatial resolution was quantitatively measured using the slit method with a CMOS flat panel detector with a 50 µm pixel pitch, and compared to the qualitative results obtained by imaging a contrast bar pattern. The focal spot sizes in the vertical direction were smaller than that of the horizontal direction, the impact of which was visible when comparing the spatial resolution values. Our analyses revealed that both emission modes yield comparable imaging performances in terms of beam quality, spectra shape and spatial resolution effects. There were no significantly large differences, thus providing the motivation for future studies to design and develop stable and robust cone beam imaging systems for various diagnostic applications.

Evaluation of Abdominal Computed Tomography Image Quality Using a New Version of Vendor-Specific Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare abdominal computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with a new version of model-based iterative reconstruction (Veo 3.0; GE Healthcare) to those created with Veo 2.0. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board and was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. The raw data from 29 consecutive patients who had undergone CT abdomen scanning was used to reconstruct 4 sets of 3.75-mm axial images: Veo 2.0, Veo 3.0 standard, Veo 3.0 5% resolution preference (RP), and Veo 3.0 20% RP. A slice thickness optimization of 3.75 mm and texture feature was selected for Veo 3.0 reconstructions.The images were reviewed by 3 independent readers in a blinded, randomized fashion using a 5-point Likert scale and 5-point comparative scale.Multiple 2-dimensional circular regions of interest were defined for noise and contrast-to-noise ratio measurements. Line profiles were drawn across the 7 lp/cm bar pattern of the CatPhan 600 phantom for spatial resolution evaluation. RESULTS: The Veo 3.0 standard image set was scored better than Veo 2.0 in terms of artifacts (mean difference, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.25-0.6; P < 0.0001), overall image quality (mean difference, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62-1.13; P < 0.0001) and qualitative resolution (mean difference, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.69-1.1; P < 0.0001). Although the Veo 3.0 standard and RP05 presets were preferred across most categories, the Veo 3.0 RP20 series ranked best for bone detail. Image noise and spatial resolution increased along a spectrum with Veo 2.0 the lowest and RP20 the highest. CONCLUSION: Veo 3.0 enhances imaging evaluation relative to Veo 2.0; readers preferred Veo 3.0 image appearance despite the associated mild increases in image noise. These results provide suggested parameters to be used clinically and as a basis for future evaluations, such as focal lesion detection, in the oncology setting.

Correction of Motion Artifacts From Shuttle Mode Computed Tomography Acquisitions for Body Perfusion Imaging Applications.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of shuttle-mode computed tomography (CT) technology for body perfusion applications by quantitatively assessing and correcting motion artifacts. METHODS: Noncontrast shuttle-mode CT scans (10 phases, 2 nonoverlapping bed locations) were acquired from 4 patients on a GE 750HD CT scanner. Shuttling effects were quantified using Euclidean distances (between-phase and between-bed locations) of corresponding fiducial points on the shuttle and reference phase scans (prior to shuttle mode). Motion correction with nonrigid registration was evaluated using sum-of-squares differences and distances between centers of segmented volumes of interest on shuttle and references images. RESULTS: Fiducial point analysis showed an average shuttling motion of 0.85 ± 1.05 mm (between-bed) and 1.18 ± 1.46 mm (between-phase), respectively. The volume-of-interest analysis of the nonrigid registration results showed improved sum-of-squares differences from 2950 to 597, between-bed distance from 1.64 to 1.20 mm, and between-phase distance from 2.64 to 1.33 mm, respectively, averaged over all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Shuttling effects introduced during shuttle-mode CT acquisitions can be computationally corrected for body perfusion applications.

Cone beam CT for determining breast cancer margin: an initial experience and its comparison with mammography and specimen radiograph.

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of cone beam CT (CBCT) in determining the breast cancer margin using, to compare the results with mammography and specimen radiography, and to explore the clinical potential of CBCT for breast imaging. METHODS: Specimens of 46 breast cancer patients were imaged by using a prototype CBCT system. Each patient underwent mammography, CBCT and X-ray of breast surgical specimen within 6 months. Images of mammography, breast surgical specimen radiography and CBCT were evaluated by an experienced radiologist. Indicators, such as: morphology, glitch, density, invasion, structural distortion and calcification, were observed. RESULT: There was no significant difference of the calcification, glitch and morphology among three methods. However, there was significant difference in indicators of breast tumor invasion among three methods. There was statistical significance in detecting invasions of breast cancer cells in peripheral tissues among three methods. CONCLUSION: CBCT shows no superiority over mammography and specimen radiography in determining tumor's outline and detecting calcification. On the other hand, CBCT demonstrates its advantage in determining the 3 dimensional position of a lesion which could be a potential clinical application in future practices of breast imaging.

Performance Evaluation of Material Decomposition With Rapid-Kilovoltage-Switching Dual-Energy CT and Implications for Assessing Bone Mineral Density.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to quantitatively investigate the accuracy and performance of dual-energy CT (DECT) material density images and to calculate the areal bone mineral density (aBMD) for comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A rapid-kilovoltage-switching DECT scanner was used to create material density images of various two-material phantoms of known concentrations under different experimental conditions. They were subsequently also scanned by single-energy CT and DEXA. The total uncertainty and accuracy of the DECT concentration measurements was quantified by the root-mean-square (RMS) error, and linear regression was performed to evaluate measurement changes under varying scanning conditions. Alterations to accuracy with concentric (anthropomorphic) phantom geometry were explored. The sensitivity of DECT and DEXA to changes in material density was evaluated. Correlations between DEXA and DECT-derived aBMD values were assessed. RESULTS: The RMS error of DECT concentration measurements in air ranged from 9% to 244% depending on the materials. Concentration measurements made off-isocenter or with a different DECT protocol were slightly lower (≈ 5%), whereas measurement in scattering conditions resulted in a reduction of 8-27%. In concentric phantoms, higher-attenuating material in the outer chamber increased measured values of the inner material for all methods. DECT was more sensitive than DEXA to changes in BMD at 2 mg/mL K2HPO4. Measurements of aBMD using DECT and DEXA were highly correlated (R(2) = 0.98). CONCLUSION: DECT material density images were linear in response but prone to poor accuracy and biases. DECT-based aBMD could be used to monitor relative change in bone density.

In vivo CT dosimetry during CT colonography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a method of measuring rectal radiation dose in vivo during CT colonography (CTC) and assess the accuracy of size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) relative to that of in vivo dose measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimeter capsules were attached to a CTC rectal catheter to obtain four measurements of the CT radiation dose in 10 volunteers (five men and five women; age range, 23-87 years; mean age, 70.4 years). A fixed CT technique (supine and prone, 50 mAs and 120 kVp each) was used for CTC. SSDEs and percentile body habitus measurements were based on CT images and directly compared with in vivo dose measurements. RESULTS: The mean absorbed doses delivered to the rectum ranged from 8.8 to 23.6 mGy in the 10 patients, whose mean body habitus was in the 27th percentile among American adults 18-64 years old (range, 0.5-67th percentile). The mean SSDE error was 7.2% (range, 0.6-31.4%). CONCLUSION: This in vivo radiation dose measurement technique can be applied to patients undergoing CTC. Our measurements indicate that SSDEs are reasonable estimates of the rectal absorbed dose. The data obtained in this pilot study can be used as benchmarks for assessing dose estimates using other indirect methods (e.g., Monte Carlo simulations).

Evaluation of over 100 scanner-years of computed tomography daily quality control data.

PURPOSE: The results of a long-term, comprehensive CT quality control (QC) program were analyzed to investigate differences in failure rates based on QC test, scanner utilization pattern, and number of channels, as well as explore issues regarding testing frequency. METHODS: CT QC data were collected over a 4-yr period for 26 CT scanners representing two different vendors and using three different QC programs culminating in over 100 scanner-years of QC data. QC tests analyzed included water tests [mean CT number, standard deviation, and uniformity], linearity tests [air, water, and acrylic], and artifact analysis [water phantom and large phantom]. The data were organized based on scanner use, number of channels, scanner modality, and QC test. Logistic regression model analysis with generalized estimating equation method was used to estimate failure rates for each group. RESULTS: A significant difference between failure rates with respect to QC test was found (p-value = 0.02). Large phantom artifacts, standard deviation of water, and water phantom artifacts had the three highest failure rates. No significant difference was found between failure rates organized by scanner use, scanner modality, or number of channels. CONCLUSIONS: Standard deviation of water is the most important quantitative value to collect as part of a daily QC program. Uniformity and linearity tests have relatively low failure rates and, therefore, may not require daily verification. While its failure rates were moderate, daily artifact analysis is suggested due to its potentially high impact on clinical image quality. Weekly or monthly large phantom artifact analysis is encouraged for those sites possessing an appropriate phantom.

A CT acquisition technique to generate images at various dose levels for prospective dose reduction studies.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to determine whether the average of N CT images acquired at a particular dose (D) has image noise equivalent to that of a single image acquired at a dose of N × D. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electron density phantom, an image quality phantom, and an adult anthropomorphic phantom were scanned multiple times on a 16-MDCT scanner at five effective tube current-rotation time product (mAs) settings (130 kVp; 12, 24, 48, 72, and 144 mAs). Lower-mAs images were averaged to simulate higher-mAs images. Differences in CT number and image noise between simulated and acquired images were quantified using the electron density phantom. Image quality phantom images were scored by three physicists to investigate differences in low- and high-contrast resolution. A forced-choice observer study was performed with three radiologists using anthropomorphic phantom images to evaluate differences in overall image quality. RESULTS: The CT number was, on average, reproduced to within 1 HU, and image noise was reproduced to within 4%, which is below the threshold for visibly perceptible differences in noise. Low- and high-contrast resolution were not degraded, and simulated images were visually indistinguishable from acquired images. CONCLUSION: For the dose range studied, it was concluded that the image quality of a CT image produced by averaging multiple low-mAs CT images is identical to that of a high-mAs image acquired at equivalent effective dose, when all other acquisition and reconstruction parameters are held constant. Prospective CT dose-reduction studies may be feasible by acquiring multiple low-dose scans instead of a single high-dose scan. Simulated high-dose images could be interpreted clinically, whereas lower-dose images would be available for an observer study.

Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.

The impact of additive noise on the performance of a digital X-ray imaging system was investigated. The X-ray system is uniquely designed for small animal studies with a focal spot of 20 microm and an adjustable source-to-object distance for radiography. The noise power spectrum and the detective quantum efficiency of this system were measured. The additive noise increased rapidly when the exposure time exceeded a certain range, since the charge-coupled devices of the detector had no cooling system. The noise power spectrum for the additive noise and the noise of the entire imaging system were studied and compared at different exposure times. The detective quantum efficiency was also measured at different exposure times. It was observed that for exposure times less than 10 s, the detective quantum efficiency ((DQE)(0)) is approximately 0.26, dropping to 0.13 at 4 lp/mm and to 0.026 at 8 lp/mm. However, when the exposure exceeds a certain limit (10 s in this study), the rapidly increased additive noise caused the system to be no longer quantum noise limited, resulting in a decreased detective quantum efficiency and a degraded system performance. For example, at an exposure of 20 s, the DQE(O) is approximately 0.22, dropping to 0.11 at 3 lp/mm and to 0.022 at 8 lp/mm.

Impacts of Filtration on Contrast-Detail Detectability of an X-ray Imaging System.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of added filtration on the contrast-detail detectability of a digital X-ray imaging system for small animal studies. A digital X-ray imaging system specifically designed for small animal studies was used. This system is equipped with a micro X-ray source with a tungsten target and a beryllium window filtration and a CCD-based digital detector. Molybdenum filters of 0 mm, 0.02 mm, and 0.05 mm in thickness were added. The corresponding X-ray spectra and contrast-detail detectabilities were measured using two phantoms of different thicknesses simulating breast tissue under different exposures. The added Mo filters reduced the low-energy as well as the high-energy photons, hence providing a narrowband for imaging quality improvement. In the experiments with a 1.15 cm phantom, the optimal image detectability was observed using 22 kVp and the 0.05 mm Mo filter. With the 2.15 cm phantom, the best detectability was obtained with 22 kVp and the 0.02 mm Mo filter. Our experiments showed that appropriate filtrations could reduce certain low- and high-energy components of X-ray spectra which have limited contributions to image contrast. At the same time, such filtration could improve the contrast-detail detectability, particularly at relatively low kVp and high filtration. Therefore, optimal image quality can be obtained with the same absorbed radiation dose by the subjects when appropriate filtration is used.