[Pharmaceutical traceability integrated with the patient file. Development of a computerized hospital application]. / Traçabilité pharmaceutique intégrée au dossier patient. Développement d'une application informatique hospitalière.

The Clinical Pharmacy Department (CPD) of the Gustave Roussy Institute, has developed a traceability software package that is integrated with the patient file. The Traceability & Medical Devices Functional Unit manages the Blood Derivative Medicinal Product traceability circuits, the circuits of over 400 Sterile Medical Devices and, generally speaking, those for all pharmaceutical goods for which traceability is imperative. The SIMBAD-TRACE software package has been developed in situ and was first open for access in March 1999. It enables pharmaceutical traceability data to be accessed from 500 networked workstations. The references tracked generated about 10,000 movements per year. In terms of performance, the system achieves three complementary objectives: 1) reporting traceability scores which reflect the ability of CPD and the establishment to pertinently respond to a complex regulatory requirement on a daily basis; 2) the contribution of the tool to cost containment with respect to allocating rare goods; the contribution of the software package to the implementation of medical device vigilance inquiries, particularly descending inquiries. Finally, SIMBAD-TRACE is one of the pillars of our Quality Assurance Program (QAP).

Red blood cell glutathione levels before and during treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy cisplatin/5-fluorouracil in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

The purpose of this study was to find out whether the glutathione (GSH), in red blood cells could predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (CDDP/5-FU) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Three courses of induction chemotherapy with CDDP/5-FU were administered and followed by surgery and radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone, in 51 patients with HNSCC. GSH was measured by spectrophotometry in red blood cell before any treatment (Sample 1: S1), after each course of chemotherapy (S2, S3, S4). Our results showed that GSH was the same at diagnosis in patients with complete or partial response (OR) compared to those with stable or progressive disease (NR). With regard to evolution of the GSH during the 3 courses of CT a significant difference was found between courses (S2: 5.06 +/- 0.35 vs S4 = 3.61 +/- 0.4 mumol/g haemoglobin, p < 0.05). When we separated our patients into OR and NR, a significant difference was found over the 3 courses of chemotherapy for GSH content. Non responder patients showed decreased GSH content at the end of the treatment, (S2: 5 +/- 0.5 vs S4: 2.2 +/- 0.4 mumol/g haemoglobin, p < 0.05) while OR were stable. In conclusion, red blood cell GSH seems to have no early predictive value for chemoresponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy CDDP/5-FU in HNSCC.