Delirium detection using relative delta power based on 1-minute single-channel EEG: a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is frequently unrecognised. EEG shows slower frequencies (i.e. below 4 Hz) during delirium, which might be useful in improving delirium recognition. We studied the discriminative performance of a brief single-channel EEG recording for delirium detection in an independent cohort of patients. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre study, postoperative patients aged ≥60 yr were included (n=159). Before operation and during the first 3 postoperative days, patients underwent a 5-min EEG recording, followed by a video-recorded standardised cognitive assessment. Two or, in case of disagreement, three delirium experts classified each postoperative day based on the video and chart review. Relative delta power (1-4 Hz) was based on 1-min artifact-free EEG. The diagnostic value of the relative delta power was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), using the expert classification as the gold standard. RESULTS: Experts classified 84 (23.3%) postoperative days as either delirium or possible delirium, and 276 (76.7%) non-delirium days. The AUROC of the relative EEG delta power was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.82]. Exploratory analysis showed that relative power from 1 to 6 Hz had significantly higher AUROC (0.78, 95% CI 0.72-0.84, P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Delirium/possible delirium can be detected in older postoperative patients based on a single-channel EEG recording that can be automatically analysed. This objective detection method with a continuous scale instead of a dichotomised outcome is a promising approach for routine detection of delirium. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02404181.

[Recognising postoperative delirium in the elderly]. / Postoperatief delirium herkennen bij ouderen.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of agreement between delirium experts on the diagnosis of delirium based on exactly the same information, and to assess the sensitivity of delirium screening methods used by clinical nurses. DESIGN: Prospective observational longitudinal study. METHOD: Older patients (≥ 60 years) who underwent major surgery were included. During the first three days after surgery they had a standardised cognitive screening test which was recorded on video. Two delirium experts independently evaluated these videos and the information from the patient records. They classified the patients as having 'no delirium', 'possible delirium' or 'delirium'. If there was disagreement, a third expert was consulted. The final classification, based on consensus of two or three delirium experts, was compared with the result of the delirium screening carried out by the clinical nurses. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients were included and 424 postoperative classifications were obtained. The agreement between the experts was 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.68), based on Cohen's kappa. In 89 (21.0%) of the postoperative classifications there was no agreement between the experts and a third expert was consulted. The nurses using the delirium screening tools recognised 32% of the cases that had been classified as delirium by the experts. CONCLUSION: There was considerable disagreement between the classifications of individual delirium experts, based on exactly the same information, indicating the difficulty of the diagnosis. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the delirium screening tools used by the clinical nurses was poor. Further research should focus on the development of objective methods for recognising delirium.