The detrimental effect of donor-specific antibodies is irrespective of its level in highly-immunized living donor kidney transplant recipients: A case-control series.

Background: The impact of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in (highly-) immunized living donor kidney transplant recipients is reported differentially in various patient cohorts. Methods: We have performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients in our center between 2010-2019. Recipients who underwent plasmafiltration for a positive CDC-crossmatch were excluded. For each DSA+ recipient (DSA+), one immunized recipient without DSA (pPRA+) and two non-immunized recipients (pPRA-) were included. Patient and graft survival were analyzed and a subgroup analysis of DSA+ recipients was performed. Results: For 63 DSA+ recipients, 63 PRA+ and 126 PRA- recipients were included. 26 (41%) had class I, 24 (38%) class II and 13 (21%) combined HLA class I and II DSA. Death-censored graft survival was inferior in DSA+ recipients compared to pPRA+ (HR 2.38 [95% CI 1.00-5.70]) as well as to pPRA- (HR 3.91 [1.86-8.22]). In multivariate analysis, DSA remained of negative influence on death-censored graft survival. Flowcytometric crossmatch, MFI value, HLA class and origin of DSA were not of significant impact. Conclusion: In our cohort of (highly-) immunized recipients, pretransplant DSA led to inferior death-censored graft survival. There were no "safe" DSA characteristics since only DSA per se impacted death-censored graft survival.

Predictors of postoperative cardiovascular complications up to 3 months after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplant patients have a high peri-operative risk for cardiovascular events. Pre-operative screening for cardiac ischaemia might lower this risk, but there are no specific guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a chart review for all renal transplants performed between January 2010 and December 2013. We collected data about patient characteristics, pre-operative cardiac evaluation before referral, diagnostic tests and interventions. Logistic regression analyses were then applied to relate these factors to the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation or admission for heart failure within 3 months after transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 770 kidney transplants were performed in 751 patients. In 750 cases (97%) a referral to the cardiologist was made. Non-invasive ischaemia detection by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, exercise stress test or dobutamine stress echocardiography was carried out in 631 cases (82%). Coronary angiography was performed in 85 cases, which revealed significant coronary artery disease in 19 cases. Prophylactic revascularisation was done in 7 cases. The incidence of the study endpoint was 8.6%. In multivariable regression analysis, age at transplantation, pre-transplant myocardial infarction or heart failure, post-operative decrease in haemoglobin and positive non-invasive ischaemia testing were significantly associated with the study endpoint. However, when analysed separately, none of the different non-invasive ischaemia detection modalities were related to the study endpoint. CONCLUSION: Especially those renal transplant candidates with a cardiac history carry a high risk for a cardiovascular event post-transplantation. Uniformity in cardiac screening of renal transplant candidates and better pre-operative preparation might lower this post-operative risk. Besides, post-transplant anaemia should be prevented.

Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in a Patient With Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Case Report.

Severe recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is a very rare inherited disease with excessive blisters forming starting at birth. Surgical intervention in this population creates a challenge: preventing formation of new lesions while managing previously scarred tissues. We present a case of a 27-year-old patient with end-stage renal disease caused by rapidly progressive IgA nephropathy. Living donor kidney transplantation was performed under local, spinal and epidural anesthesia. Living kidney transplantation in epidermolysis bullosa patients with end-stage renal disease should not be a contraindication for transplantation and should be considered as a viable and feasible option after careful preparation.

DCD donor hemodynamics as predictor of outcome after kidney transplantation.

Insufficient hemodynamics during agonal phase-ie, the period between withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and circulatory arrest-in Maastricht category III circulatory-death donors (DCD) potentially exacerbate ischemia/reperfusion injury. We included 409 Dutch adult recipients of DCD donor kidneys transplanted between 2006 and 2014. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2-with pulse oximetry at the fingertip) and systolic blood pressure (SBP-with arterial catheter) were measured during agonal phase, and were dichotomized into minutes of SpO2 > 60% or SpO2 < 60%, and minutes of SBP > 80 mmHg or SBP < 80 mmHg. Outcome measures were and primary non-function (PNF), delayed graft function (DGF), and three-year graft survival. Primary non-function (PNF) rate was 6.6%, delayed graft function (DGF) rate was 67%, and graft survival at three years was 76%. Longer periods of agonal phase (median 16 min [IQR 11-23]) contributed significantly to an increased risk of DGF (P = .012), but not to PNF (P = .071) and graft failure (P = .528). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that an increase from 7 to 20 minutes in period of SBP < 80 mmHg was associated with 2.19 times the odds (95% CI 1.08-4.46, P = .030) for DGF. In conclusion, duration of agonal phase is associated with early transplant outcome. SBP < 80 mmHg during agonal phase shows a better discrimination for transplant outcome than SpO2 < 60% does.

Kidney transplantation in patients declined by other centres.

BACKGROUND: Transplant centres show considerable disagreement in the acceptance of transplant candidates with relative contraindications. The aim of this study is to investigate the outcomes of our patients who had been refused at other centres prior to transplantation at our centre. METHODS: We included patients who had been excluded from transplantation or wait-listing at other centres before referral to our centre. We scored the reasons for refusal at other centres, the type of transplantation procedure, postoperative and long-term complications, patient and graft survival and how these patients experienced the transplantation and quality of life at our centre. All regular patients transplanted in 2010 functioned as a control group for outcome parameters. RESULTS: We identified 23 patients in the period from January 2000 until March 2013. The most frequent reason for the refusal at other centres was obesity. Twenty of the 23 patients (87%) were alive and 19 had a functioning graft (83%) after a median follow-up of 21.0 months after transplantation (range 11.0-48.9). There were significantly more wound-related problems in the study group as compared with the control group (p = 0.029), but their kidney function at one year after transplantation was not significantly different. The patients indicated an improvement of quality of life after transplantation and in general were satisfied with the transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had previously had been denied transplantation at other centres generally did well after kidney transplantation with an increased risk of wound complications but a satisfactory graft and patient survival.

Kidney retransplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa: a surgical challenge.

The aim of this study is to review the surgical outcome of kidney retransplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa in comparison to first kidney transplants. The database was screened for retransplantations between 1995 and 2013. Each study patient was matched with 3 patients with a first kidney transplantation. Just for graft and patient survival analyses, we added an extra control group including all patients receiving a second transplantation in the contralateral iliac fossa. We identified 99 patients who received a retransplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa. There was significantly more blood loss and longer operative time in the retransplantation group. The rate of vascular complications and graft nephrectomies within 1 year was significantly higher in the study group. The graft survival rates at 1 year and 3, 5, and 10 years were 76%, 67%, 61%, and 47% in the study group versus 94%, 88%, 77%, and 67% (p < 0.001) in the first control group versus 91%, 86%, 78%, and 57% (p = 0.008) in the second control group. Patient survival did not differ significantly between the groups. Kidney retransplantation in ipsilateral iliac fossa is surgically challenging and associated with more vascular complications and graft loss within the first year after transplantation. Whenever feasible, the second renal transplant (first retransplant) should be performed contralateral to the prior failed one.

KIR-ligand mismatches are associated with reduced long-term graft survival in HLA-compatible kidney transplantation.

Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes of the innate immune system with the ability to detect HLA class I disparities via killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR). To test whether such KIR-ligand mismatches contribute to the rejection of human solid allografts, we did a retrospective cohort study of 397 HLA-DR-compatible kidney transplantations and determined the KIR and HLA genotypes of recipients and the HLA genotypes of donors. In transplantations compatible for HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR (n = 137), in which a role for T cells and HLA antibodies in rejection was minimized, KIR-ligand mismatches were associated with an approximately 25% reduction in 10-year death-censored graft survival (p = 0.043). This effect was comparable to the effect of classical HLA-A and HLA-B incompatibility, and in HLA-A,-B-incompatible transplantations (n = 260) no significant additional effect of KIR-ligand mismatches was observed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed the effect of KIR-ligand mismatching as an independent risk factor in HLA-A,-B,-DR-compatible transplantations (hazard ratio 2.29, range 1.03-5.10, p = 0.043). This finding constitutes the first indication that alloreactive NK cells may thwart the success of HLA-compatible kidney transplantations, and suggests that suppression of NK-cell activity can improve the survival of such kidney grafts.

Use of stenting in living donor kidney transplantation: does it reduce vesicoureteral complications?

The risk of urologic complications after kidney transplantation is 0% to 30%. We studied the impact of prophylactic stent placement during transplantation by assessing the necessity for a percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) after living kidney transplantation. From January 2003 to December 2007, 342 living donor kidney transplantations were performed. Intra- and postoperative data were collected retrospectively from 285 patients with stent and 57 without. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups, except for the number of previous transplantations: 31 (11%) patients with versus 16 (28%) without stent had a history of >1 transplantation (P < .001). From patients with PCN, 55 (87%) patients in the stented group received a PCN <3 months versus 11 (100%) in the nonstented group (P = .71). The reoperation rate for urologic complications was similar in both groups (3% (stented) versus 5% (nonstented; P = .43). In multivariate analysis, risk for PCN was similar in both groups (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 0.5-2.5). Recipient survival was not significantly different. One- and 3-year death-censored graft survival was not significantly different between stented (89% and 84%) and nonstented group (90% and 85%, P = .71 and P = .96). Ureteral stent insertion is not associated with a reduced rate of PCN placement in living donor kidney transplantation.

Living kidney donors: impact of age on long-term safety.

The safety of older live kidney donors, especially the decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after donation, has been debated. In this study we evaluated long-term renal outcome in older live kidney donors. From 1994 to 2006 follow-up data of 539 consecutive live kidney donations were prospectively collected, during yearly visits to the outpatient clinic. Donors were categorized into two groups, based on age: < 60 (n = 422) and ≥ 60 (n = 117). Elderly had lower GFR predonation (80 vs. 96 mL/min respectively, p < 0.001). During median follow-up of 5.5 years, maximum decline in eGFR was 38% ± 9% and the percentage maximum decline was not different in both groups. On long-term follow-up, significantly more elderly had an eGFR < 60 mL/min (131 (80%) vs. 94 (31%), p < 0.001). However, renal function was stable and no eGFR of less than 30 mL/min was seen. In multivariate analysis higher body mass index (HR 1.09, 95%CI 1.03-1.14) and more HLA mismatches (HR 1.17, 95%CI 1.03-1.34) were significantly correlated with worse graft survival. Donor age did not influence graft survival. After kidney donation decline in eGFR is similar in younger and older donors. As kidney function does not progressively decline, live kidney donation by elderly is considered safe.

Altruistic donor triggered domino-paired kidney donation for unsuccessful couples from the kidney-exchange program.

Between January 2000 and July 2009, 132 individuals inquired about altruistic kidney donation to strangers. These donors were willing to donate to genetically and emotionally unrelated patients. Some altruistic donors wished to donate to a specific person, but most wished to donate anonymously. In domino-paired donation, the altruistic donor donates to the recipient of an incompatible couple; the donor of that couple (domino-donor) donates to another couple or to the waiting list. In contrast to kidney-exchange donation where bilateral matching of couples is required, recipient and donor matching are unlinked in domino-paired donation. This facilitates matching for unsuccessful couples from the kidney-exchange program where blood type O prevails in recipients and is under-represented in donors. Fifty-one altruistic donors (39%) donated their kidney and 35 domino-donors were involved. There were 29 domino procedures, 24 with 1 altruistic donor and 1 domino-donor, 5 with more domino-donors. Eighty-six transplantations were performed. Donor and recipient blood type distribution in the couples limited allocation to blood type non-O waiting list patients. The success rate of domino-paired donation is dependent on the composition of the pool of incompatible pairs, but it offers opportunities for difficult to match pairs that were unsuccessful in the kidney-exchange program.

Successful expansion of the living donor pool by alternative living donation programs.

Between January 2000 and December 2007, 786 potential recipients and 1059 potential donors attended our pretransplant unit with the request for a living-donor renal transplant procedure. The recipients brought one potential donor in 77.2% and two or more donors in 22.8% of cases. In the regular living donor program, a compatible donor was found for 467 recipients. Without considering alternative donation, 579 donors would have been refused. Alternative living donation programs led to 114 compatible combinations: kidney-exchange program (35), ABO-incompatible donation (25), anonymous donation (37) and domino-paired anonymous donation (17). Together, the 114 alternative program donations and the 467 regular living donations led to 581 living donor transplantations (24.4% increase). Eventually for 54.9% (581/1059) of our donors, a compatible combination was found. Donor-recipient incompatibility comprised 19.4% (89/458) in the final refused population, which is 8.8% of the potential donor-recipient couples. Without considering alternative donation, 30.1% (174/579) of the refused donors would have been refused on incompatibility and 6.4% (37/579) because they were anonymous. This is 20% of the potential donor population (211/1059). The implementation of alternative living donation programs led to a significant increase in the number of transplantations, while transplantations via the direct donation program steadily increased.

The Cox proportional hazards analysis in words: examples in the renal transplantation field.

When renal transplantation was still in its infancy, failures were more prevalent and successes could be directly derived from facts and events. Because results have improved dramatically over the last decades and many factors have seemed to be involved in these continuously improving results, it is difficult to ascertain the individual contribution of each factor. Survival analysis is the appropriate method for evaluation of factors influencing results of renal transplantation. In this overview, two different methods for survival analysis are compared and described. The Kaplan-Meier analysis is the oldest and most frequently used in renal transplantation epidemiology. Important shortcomings of this method are described and substantiated with examples. The Cox proportional hazards (PH) analysis was developed in 1972 by Sir David Cox. With this multivariable analysis it is possible to identify those variables that influence the rate of failure. With this method, the influences of all other variables in the model are taken into consideration, and adjustment for interaction with other variables or with time can be made. In this article, the Cox analysis and the statistical terms that go with it are described in words and examples are given. In a complex, observational study concerning a multifactor-influenced population such as the renal transplant population, the use of the Cox model is mandatory to unravel the influences of the different variables on the failure rate.

[Kidney transplantation: more kidneys from living donors, individualised immunosuppression and better results]. / Niertransplantatie: meer nieren van levende donoren, geïndividualiseerde immunosuppressie en betere resultaten.

In the period 1996-2001, the number of transplanted postmortal kidneys decreased from 425 to 380, while at the same time the number of kidneys transplanted from living donors increased from 81 in 1996 to 155 per year in 2001. There was a striking increase in the proportion of living non-related donors (59/155). Although the short-term results of kidney transplantation have improved, and kidneys are very rarely lost as a consequence of acute rejection, the average life of a transplanted kidney has scarcely improved. Chronic allograft dysfunction is now the major cause of transplant loss. This process is hardly influenced by the immunosuppressive drugs currently used. To improve the cardiovascular risk profile, several centres discontinue the use of cyclosporin, tacrolimus or prednisone at 6 or 12 months after transplantation or substitute these with other drugs. This is complicated by acute rejection episodes in 10-20% of patients. With the arrival of a number of new immunosuppressive drugs the risk of rejection might be reduced.

The superior results of living-donor renal transplantation are not completely caused by selection or short cold ischemia time: a single-center, multivariate analysis.

BACKGROUND: The results of living-donor (LD) renal transplantations are better than those of postmortem-donor (PMD) transplantations. To investigate whether this can be explained by a more favorable patient selection procedure in the LD population, we performed a Cox proportional hazards analysis including variables with a known influence on graft survival. METHODS: All patients who underwent transplantations between January 1981 and July 2000 were included in the analysis (n=1,124, 2.6% missing values). There were 243 LD transplantations (including 30 unrelated) and 881 PMD transplantations. The other variables included were the following: donor and recipient age and gender, recipient original disease, race, current smoking habit, cardiovascular disease, body weight, peak and current panel reactive antibody, number of preceding transplants and type and duration of renal replacement therapy, and time since failure of native kidneys. In addition, the number of human leukocyte antigen identical combinations, first and second warm and cold ischemia periods, left or right kidney and fossa, donor kidney anatomy, donor serum creatinine and proteinuria, and transplantation year were included. RESULTS: In a multivariate model, donor origin (PMD vs. LD) significantly influenced the graft failure risk censored for death independently of any of the other risk factors (P=0.0303, relative risk=1.75). There was no time interaction. When the variable cold ischemia time was excluded in the same model, the significance of the influence of donor origin on the graft failure risk increased considerably, whereas the magnitude of the influence was comparable (P=0.0004, relative risk=1.92). The influence of all other variables on the graft failure risk was unaffected when the cold ischemia period was excluded. The exclusion of none of the other variables resulted in a comparable effect. Donor origin did not influence the death risk. CONCLUSION: The superior results of LD versus PMD transplantations can be partly explained by the dichotomy in the cold ischemia period in these populations (selection). However, after adjustment for cold ischemia periods, the influence of donor origin still remained significant, independent of any of the variables introduced. This superiority is possibly caused by factors inherent to the transplanted organ itself, for example, the absence of brain death and cardiovascular instability of the donor before nephrectomy.

Ischemia times and donor serum creatinine in relation to renal graft failure.

BACKGROUND: The results of renal transplantation are dependent on many variables. To simplify the decision process related to a kidney offer, the authors wondered which variables had the most important influence on the graft failure risk. METHODS: All transplant patients (n=1,124) between January 1981 and July 2000 were included in the analysis (2.6% had missing values). The variables included were donor and recipient age and gender, recipient original disease, race, donor origin, current smoking, cardiovascular disease, body weight, peak and current panel reactive antibody (PRA), number of preceding transplants, type and duration of renal replacement therapy, and time since failure of native kidneys. Also, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identity or not, first and second warm and cold ischemia times, left or right kidney and fossa, donor kidney anatomy, donor serum creatinine and proteinuria, and transplantation year were included. RESULTS: In a multivariate model, cold ischemia time and its time-dependent variable significantly influenced the graft failure risk censored for death (P<0.0001) independent of any of the other risk factors. The influence primarily affected the risk in the first week after transplantation; thereafter, it gradually disappeared during the first year after transplantation. Donor serum creatinine also significantly influenced the graft failure risk in a time-dependent manner (P<0.0001). The risk of a high donor serum creatinine is already enlarged in the immediate postoperative phase and increases thereafter; the curve is closely related to the degree of the elevation. The other variables with a significant influence on the graft failure rate were, in order of decreasing significance, recipient age, donor gender, donor age, HLA identity, transplantation year, preceding transplantations, donor origin, and peak PRA. CONCLUSIONS: Donor serum creatinine and cold ischemia time are important time-dependent variables independently influencing the risk of graft failure censored for death. The best strategy for improving the results of cadaveric transplantations is to decrease the cold ischemia time and to allocate kidneys from donors with an elevated serum creatinine to low-risk recipients.

Proteinuria after renal transplantation affects not only graft survival but also patient survival.

BACKGROUND: Proteinuria is associated with an increased risk of renal failure. Moreover, proteinuria is associated with an increased death risk in patients with diabetes mellitus or hypertension and even in the general population. METHODS: One year after renal transplantation, we studied the influence of the presence of proteinuria on the risk of either graft failure or death in all 722 recipients of a kidney graft in our center who survived at least 1 year with a functioning graft. Proteinuria was analyzed both as a categorical variable (presence versus absence) and as a continuous variable (quantification of 24 hr urine). Other variables included in this analysis were: donor/recipient age and gender, original disease, race, number of HLA-A and HLA-B mismatches, previous transplants, postmortal or living related transplantation, and transplantation year. At 1 year after transplantation, we included: proteinuria, serum cholesterol, serum creatinine, blood pressure, and the use of antihypertensive medication. RESULTS: In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, proteinuria at 1 year after transplantation (both as a categorical and continuous variable) was an important and independent variable influencing all endpoints. The influence of proteinuria as a categorical variable on graft failure censored for death showed no interaction with any of the other variables. There was an adverse effect of the presence of proteinuria on the graft failure rate (RR=2.03). The influence of proteinuria as a continuous variable showed interaction with original disease. The presence of glomerulonephritis, hypertension, and systemic diseases as the original disease significantly increased the risk of graft failure with an increasing amount of proteinuria at 1 year. The influence of proteinuria as a categorical variable on the rate ratio for patient failure was significant, and there was no interaction with any of the other significant variables (RR=1.98). The death risk was almost twice as high for patients with proteinuria at 1 year compared with patients without proteinuria. The influence of proteinuria as a continuous variable was also significant and also without interaction with other variables. The death risk increased with increasing amounts of proteinuria at 1 year. Both the risks for cardiovascular and for noncardiovascular death were increased. CONCLUSION: Proteinuria after renal transplantation increases both the risk for graft failure and the risk for death.

Long-term graft survival after urological complications of 695 kidney transplantations.

PURPOSE: We ascertain the incidence, management and long-term outcome of early urological complications requiring surgical exploration in kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 695 consecutive kidney transplantations performed between January 1985 and January 1997 were assessed in regard to urological complications that occurred within 1 year after transplant. A computerized database was used to analyze graft recipient characteristics, the implantation procedure, complications and outcome in select patients and all those who underwent transplant during the same period. In the noncomplication group sufficient data for evaluation was available for 556 patients. We performed the Cox proportional hazards analysis with overall graft failure, graft failure or death as end points of observation. RESULTS: Overall, 42 (6.0%) patients required revision of vesicoureteral anastomosis. Complications were identified after a median of 6 days (range 0 to 135). The primary reconstruction technique was extravesical in 64% and transvesical in 33% of patients, including 1 that involved ureteral Bricker anastomosis. Obstruction and/or leakage at vesicoureteral anastomosis accounted for 69% of urological complications. Revision was performed with a number of different reconstruction techniques. A second revision was required in 16.7%. Mean followup after primary transplant was 9.1 years (range 3.2 to 15). Multivariate analysis showed that surgical treatment of urological complication during year 1 after kidney transplantation did not increase the risk of overall graft failure, graft failure or death. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that long-term graft survival is not affected by a surgically treated urological complication.

The influence of cholesterol on mortality after transplantation is age dependent.

There is still no consensus on the treatment of elevated serum cholesterol in patients with a renal transplant. In the general population treatment is age dependent. We studied the influence of serum cholesterol 1 year after transplantation in all 676 recipients of a kidney graft transplanted in Rotterdam that survived and functioned for at least 1 year. The other variables included in this analysis are: donor and recipient age and gender, original disease, race, number of HLA A and B mismatches, number of previous transplantations, postmortal or living related transplantation and transplantation year. At 1 year after transplantation the following variables were included: serum cholesterol, serum creatinine, proteinuria and hypertension. In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, serum cholesterol at 1 year after transplantation turned out to be an important, independent variable influencing patient failure. The influence was linear but there was interaction with recipient age. The negative influence of serum cholesterol on the RR for patient failure decreased with increasing recipient age. For example, the proportional increase in RR of a 20-year-old with a serum cholesterol of 12 mmol/l compared with that of a cholesterol of a patient with serum cholesterol of 6 mmol/l was 6. In a 60-year-old with a cholesterol of 12 mmol/l the proportional increase in RR was only 1.2 compared with a contemporary with a cholesterol of 6 mmol/l. Serum cholesterol levels have an independent influence on patient failure. The RR is influenced by recipient age, so that the negative effect of increasing cholesterol levels in the elderly is overruled by the RR of age and disappears.