[Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A retrospective study on 34 complete cytoreductive surgeries]. / Carcinome séreux de bas grade ovarien à un stade avancé : étude rétrospective sur 34 patientes en résection complète.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer is a distinct, slow-growing entity that affects mainly young women. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characterisitics and survival outcomes of a population of patients suffering from advanced stage CSBG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in patients with advanced stage ovarian CSBG (FIGO IIIb-IV) who had complete macroscopic cytoreductive surgery, at Gustave Roussy Institut, Villejuif, between 2004 and 2017. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included, who were mainly young women (mean age 41.3 years), diagnosed at FIGO stage IIIC (91 %). The median follow-up was 41 months. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 16 patients (47.1 %), and complete response never occurred. Upper abdominal surgical procedures were necessary in 90 % of cases and a bowel resection was performed in more than 80 % of cases. Over 90 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by maintenance treatment with bevacizumab in over 40 % of cases. During follow-up, 9 (26 %) deaths occurred. Five-year overall survival was 70 % and disease-free survival was 20 %. CONCLUSION: CSBG of the ovary has a low chemosensitivity and requires maximum surgical management, which should be performed in expert centers.

Medium-term Follow-up of Vascular-targeted Photodynamic Therapy of Localized Prostate Cancer Using TOOKAD Soluble WST-11 (Phase II Trials).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the medium-term tumor control in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with vascular-targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy with TOOKAD Soluble WST11 (VTP) and to assess the medium-term tolerability of the treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTION: During the clinical phase II studies, 68 patients were treated with VTP under optimal treatment conditions (WST11 at 4mg/kg, light energy at 200J/cm, and a light density index ≥1) and have been included in a 3.5-yr follow-up. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Post-interventional visits were scheduled every 6 mo and conducted as per local standard practice in each study center. Cancer-free status was assessed by means of prostate-specific antigen kinetics, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and/or prostate biopsies. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At the end of the 3.5-yr follow-up, overall successful focal ablation was achieved for 51 patients (75%). Cancer was identified in the untreated lobe in 17 patients (25%). In total, 34 patients (50%) were cancer-free in both the prostate lobes. In case of recurrent/persistent malignancy, the Gleason score remained consistent or changed at the maximum by one point (upgrading by 1 Gleason point to 3+4 for eight patients and 4+3 for two patients). There were 64 related adverse events (AEs): 48% were Clavien grade I, 47% were grade II, and 5% were grade III. There were no Clavien grade IV and V AEs. Limitations included small sample size and heterogeneity in the follow-up for some centers. CONCLUSIONS: VTP is a safe and efficient treatment and represents an alternative option for localized low-risk PCa management over the medium term. Precise diagnostic methods and imaging tools are thereby essential requirements to ensure safe and complete targeted therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the medium-term outcomes of focal photodynamic therapy for early-stage prostate cancer. We found that this form of treatment is efficient and might have the potential to become a therapeutic option for low-risk cancer. Effectiveness depends on precise diagnostic methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging and accurate biopsy.

[Minimally invasive vs. open partial nephrectomy : Perioperative success and complication rates]. / Minimal-invasive vs. offene Nierenteilresektionen : Perioperative Erfolgs- und Komplikationsraten.

BACKGROUND: Solid renal masses are increasingly treated with nephron-sparing surgery. As in other uro-oncological surgical techniques, minimally invasive and robotic-assisted techniques are becoming increasingly popular. OBJECTIVES: The perioperative results from minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery versus open surgery were retrospectively compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our single center retrospective study, all patients who underwent nephron-sparing tumor excision between 2006 and 2016 were divided into two groups (group O = open approach and group M = minimally invasive approach). The (pre-)operative data, complications, and change in renal function were compared. Trifecta criteria (R0, no perioperative complications, ischemia ≤25 min) were used to determine success rates. RESULTS: Of 329 patients, 310 were included for analysis (group O 123, group M 187). Patients in group O had significantly worse ASA score but comparable Charlson Index and significantly more pT3/4 tumors but equal PADUA-score when compared with group M. Otherwise, preoperative patient and tumor characteristics were comparable. Patients in group M had significantly shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001) and lower transfusion rates (p < 0.05). Trifecta criteria were more frequently met in group M than in O (M: 66.8% vs. 0: 49.6%; p < 0.001). Both major and minor complications were lower in group M (major: 10.7% vs 17.1%; minor: 13.9% vs. 26.0%; p < 0.05). Preservation of renal function was comparable in both groups. R0 rates did not differ significantly between groups (M: 97.8% vs O: 97.5%). Surgical procedure times were significantly longer in group M (p < 0.001; mean 30 min). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive, robotic assisted partial nephrectomy also proved to be successful in complex cases. In all aspects studied, the minimally invasive approach was shown to be at least equivalent to the open approach.

Functional Outcome of Completely Intracorporeal Robotic Ileal Ureteric Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To assess perioperative, clinical, and functional outcomes following completely robotic ileal ureter. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 7 consecutive patients undergoing completely intracorporeal ileal ureteric replacement between November 2015 and May 2017. One patient had a solitary kidney. A 4-arm technique was used. In 5 patients, additional psoas hitch procedure was performed. Patients had retrograde filling and removal of the ileal stent and transurethral catheter at an average of 14 days postoperatively. Renal ultrasonography, serum analysis, and diuretic renography were performed at follow-up 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 328 ± 66.3 minutes and median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range 50-200); mean length of the ileal substitute was 20.4 cm (range 18-24). No case was converted to open surgery. In 1 patient, there was a prolonged insufficiency of the pyeloileal anastomosis, requiring prolonged stenting. Apart from that, there were no major complications and no open surgical or endoscopic reinterventions. On 3-month follow-up, all patients presented symptom-free, with no signs of obstruction on ultrasound and significantly improved glomerular filtration rate, creatinine levels, and differential renal function (P = .02, 0.03, and 0.046, respectively). Five patients had a diuretic halftime <10 minutes, 2 had a halftime between 10 and 20 minutes. CONCLUSION: Completely intracorporeal robotic ileal ureteric replacement results in full functional restoration of the upper tract in cases of long defects of the mid and upper ureter.

[Focal therapy of prostate cancer]. / Fokale Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms.

The target of focal therapy (FT) in prostate cancer (PC) is partial treatment of the prostate aiming at preserving surrounding anatomical structures. The intention is to minimize typical side effects of radical treatment options combined with local tumor control. Numerous established and new technologies are used. Results of published studies showed a good safety profile, few side effects and good preservation of functional results. Oncologic long-term data are lacking so far. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the only technology that has been studied in a published prospective randomized trial. The FT is challenged by the multifocality of PC; therefore, the quality of prostate biopsy, histopathological assessment as well as imaging are of paramount importance. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained increasing importance. The FT is experimental and should only be offered within clinical trials.

[MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy : Value in the context of focal therapy]. / MRT/TRUS-fusionierte Biopsiesysteme : Stellenwert bei der fokalen Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms.

BACKGROUND: Several systems for MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate are commercially available. Many studies have shown superiority of fusion systems for tumor detection and diagnostic quality compared to random biopsy. The benefit of fusion systems in focal therapy of prostate cancer (PC) is less clear. OBJECTIVES: Critical considerations of fusion systems for planning and monitoring of focal therapy of PC were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review of available fusion systems for the period 2013-5/2016 was performed. A checklist of technical details, suitability for special anatomic situations and suitability for focal therapy was established by the German working group for focal therapy (Arbeitskreis fokale und Mikrotherapie). RESULTS: Eight fusion systems were considered (Artemis™, BioJet, BiopSee®, iSR´obot™ Mona Lisa, Hitachi HI-RVS, UroNav and Urostation®). Differences were found for biopsy mode (transrectal, perineal, both), fusion mode (elastic or rigid), navigation (image-based, electromagnetic sensor-based or mechanical sensor-based) and space requirements. DISCUSSION: Several consensus groups recommend fusion systems for focal therapy. Useful features are "needle tracking" and compatibility between fusion system and treatment device (available for Artemis™, BiopSee® and Urostation® with Focal One®; BiopSee®, Hitachi HI-RVS with NanoKnife®; BioJet, BiopSee® with cryoablation, brachytherapy). CONCLUSIONS: There are a few studies for treatment planning. However, studies on treatment monitoring after focal therapy are missing.

Why we should not routinely apply irreversible electroporation as an alternative curative treatment modality for localized prostate cancer at this stage.

Irreversible electroporation (IRE), a new tissue ablation procedure available since 2007, could meet the requirements for ideal focal therapy of prostate cancer with its postulated features, especially the absence of a thermal ablation effect. Thus far, there is not enough evidence of its effectiveness or adverse effects to justify its use as a definitive treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Moreover, neither optimal nor individual treatment parameters nor uniform endpoints have been defined thus far. No advantages over established treatment procedures have as yet been demonstrated. Nevertheless, IRE is now being increasingly applied for primary prostate cancer therapy outside clinical trials, not least through active advertising in the lay press. This review reflects the previous relevant literature on IRE of the prostate or prostate cancer and shows why we should not adopt IRE as a routine treatment modality at this stage.

[Focal therapy for small renal masses : Observation, ablation or surgery]. / Fokale Therapie von kleinen Nierentumoren : Beobachtung, Ablation oder Operation.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of renal cell carcinoma, its more frequent early detection (stage T1a) and the increasing prevalence of chronic renal failure with higher morbidity and shorter life expectancy underscore the need for multimodal focal nephron-sparing therapy. DISCUSSION: During the past decade, the gold standard shifted from radical to partial nephrectomy. Depending on the surgeon's experience, the patient's constitution and the tumor's location, the intervention can be performed laparoscopically with the corresponding advantages of lower invasiveness. A treatment alternative can be advantageous for selected patients with high morbidity and/or an increased risk of complications associated with anesthesia or surgery. Corresponding risk stratification necessitates previous confirmation of the small renal mass (cT1a) by histological examination of biopsy samples. Active surveillance represents a controlled delay in the initiation of treatment. RESULTS: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laparoscopic cryoablation are currently the most common treatment alternatives, although there are limitations particularly for renal tumors located centrally near the hilum. More recent ablation procedures such as high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), irreversible electroporation, microwave ablation, percutaneous stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and high-dose brachytherapy have high potential in some cases but are currently regarded as experimental for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

[Irreversible electroporation. Current value for focal treatment of prostate cancer]. / Irreversible Elektroporation. Aktueller Stellenwert in der fokalen Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms.

BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE), a new tissue ablation procedure available since 2007, could meet the requirements for ideal focal therapy (FT) with its postulated features, especially the absence of a thermal ablative effect. Thus far, there is no adequate tumor-entity-specific proof of its effectiveness, and its clinical application has hitherto been confined to very small patient cohorts. This also holds true for prostate cancer (PCA). Nevertheless, it is now being increasingly applied outside clinical trials-to a certain extent due to active advertising in the lay press. AIM OF THE STUDY: In this study, current discrepancies between the clinical application and study situation and the approval and market implementation of the procedure are described. The media portrayal of IRE is discussed from different perspectives, particularly with reference to the FT of PCA. This is followed by a final clinical assessment of IRE using the NanoKnife® system. DISCUSSION: Strict requirements govern new drug approvals. According to the German Drug Act (AMG), evidence of additional benefit over existing therapy must be provided through comparative clinical trials. For medicotechnical treatment procedures, on the other hand, such trial-based proof is not required according to the Medical Devices Act (MPG). The use of IRE even outside clinical trials has been actively promoted since the NanoKnife® system was put on the market. This has led to an increase in the number of uncontrolled IRE treatments of PCA in the last 2 years. The patients have to cover the high treatment costs themselves in these cases. If articles in the lay press advertise the procedure with promising but unverified contents, false hopes are raised in those concerned. This is disastrous if it delays the use of truly effective treatment options. CONCLUSION: IRE basically still has high potential for the treatment of malignancies; however, whether it can really be used for FT remains unclear due to the lack of data. This also holds true for the treatment of PCA. Only carefully conducted scientific research studies can clarify the unresolved issues regarding IRE of PCA. The urgently needed development of universally valid treatment standards for IRE is unnecessarily hampered by the flow commercially driven patients.

[Cancer control in focus insights and future perspectives for the focal treatment of prostate cancer]. / Krebskontrolle im Fokus - Einblicke und Ausblicke rund um die fokale Therapie des Prostatakrebses.

Faced with the dilemma of choosing between the extremes of standard whole gland therapy and active surveillance, those affected by prostate cancer have recently been on the lookout for less invasive alternatives. Particularly the question of whether it would be possible in low risk cancer to treat only the tumour itself while sparing the organ has long been considered. This article discusses the pros and cons of focal treatment and elucidates the latest innovative technologies. High overtreatment rates in low-risk patients submitted to standard therapy and considerable technological advances in diagnosis (particularly multiparametric MRI) and therapy are regarded by the authors as key arguments for abandoning complete tumour eradication with its side effects in favour of sufficient local cancer control by focal treatment with better preserved quality of life in suitable cases.

[Organ and function preservation in urethral cancer]. / Organ- und Funktionserhalt beim Urethralkarzinom.

Primary urethral carcinomas are rare tumors that can occur both in men and women. Histological patterns of these tumors are mixed, urothelial tumors occur as well as squamous cell tumors or adenocarcinomas.There are different clinical factors that define clinical prognosis, and the 1- and 5-year cancer-free survival is 75% and 54%. Therapy of locally limited disease is surgical resection, and organ-preserving treatment is possible if negative frozen sections prove complete surgical resection. However, in men a perineal urethrostomy might be necessary, and in women there is a high risk of urinary incontinence if more than 2 cm of the distal urethra is resected.In case of locally advanced tumors or tumors of the proximal urethra, a radical urethrectomy with supravesical urinrary diversion is necessary. In some cases neoadjuvant (radio-)chemotherapy may be an option.

[Prostate biopsy. Update for indication, procedure, and future developments]. / Biopsie der Prostata. Update zu Indikation, Durchführung und zukünftiger Entwicklung.

Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is considered the gold standard in the primary investigation of a suspicious prostate-related finding. The procedure can be carried out with ten probes or more on the lateral side of the prostate, after administering antibiotic prophylaxis and applying local anesthesia. The indication for a biopsy depends on the results of the digitorectal examination, on the serum prostate-specific antigen level, on the individual patient's wish and on his comorbidities. Whether multiparametric imaging should be used before or during the course of a primary or repeated biopsy in order to identify suspicious prostate lesions is the subject of current investigations. Extended biopsy protocols require further clinical investigations before they can become the new standard in the diagnostic work-up. This review delivers an update on the indication for, and technique of, prostate biopsies.

[Focal therapy for prostate cancer in Germany - 2014 status]. / Fokale Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms in Deutschland - Status 2014.

BACKGROUND: In localized low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), there is a therapeutic dilemma between possible overtreatment by one of the standard therapies and potentially insufficient cancer control by active surveillance (AS). Focal therapy (FT) provides an alternative therapeutic option as it aims to preserve the organ and to eliminate the cancer focus at the same time. METHODS: In this article the current state of FT for localized low-risk prostate carcinoma in Germany is described. In addition, criteria that should be used to select patients for FT are proposed. RESULTS: Currently, the effectiveness of FT is under evaluation by two multicenter, prospective studies in Germany: TOOKAD and HEMI. However, localized low-risk prostate carcinoma remains a diagnostic challenge: Multiparametric MRI as well as histopathological second opinion are considered mandatory in addition to transrectal biospy. CONCLUSION: The oncological outcome of both the TOOKAD and HEMI study will be crucial for any form of FT for prostate carcinoma in Germany in the future. However, there is a remarkably high acceptance of FT among patients.

[Impact of omission of axillary dissection on adjuvant therapy in patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes according to the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria]. / Impact de l'omission du curage axillaire sur les traitements adjuvants chez les patientes ayant un ganglion sentinelle métastatique et répondant aux critères d'inclusion de l'ACOSOG Z0011.

OBJECTIVES: The results of the ACOSOG Z0011 questioned the usefulness of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in case of metastatic sentinel lymph node (SLN). The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the omission of ALND according to the inclusion criteria of the ACOSOG Z0011 study if SLN are metastatic but also the consequences on prescription of the application of a new standard of care for adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included, between November 2007 and January 2012, patients with T1-T2N0 breast cancer and metastatic SLN meeting the criteria for omission of completion ALND according to the study of the ACOSOG Z0011. Patients were submitted anonymously and randomly in multidisciplinary meeting (MM) 3 times: with complete information including ALND (MM1), with information from SLN alone (MM2) and with complete information of ALND according to the current protocols in 2013 (MM3). During each presentation, we collected the decision of the different adjuvant treatments proposed: chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy (with radiation fields). Then, we compared therapeutic proposals of the 3 presentations. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were eligible for inclusion criteria of the ACOSOG Z0011. Treatments actually proposed during MM1 consisted of 94.8 % of chemotherapy, 77.6 % of breast and lymph nodes radiotherapy and 91.4 % of hormone therapy. During the MM2, there was no significant difference compared to the decision taken during MM1. In fact, during MM2, we decided chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormonotherapy respectively in 89.7, 79.3 and 91.4 % of the cases. During the MM3, it was shown a significant decrease in the indications of chemotherapy (82.8 %, P=0.03) and lymph nodes irradiation (56.9 %, P=0.02) compared to the therapeutic proposals of the MM1. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The lack of information of ALND does not seem to significantly alter indications for adjuvant treatment. Otherwise, the evolution of our references causes a decrease in adjuvant therapy.

[Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)]. / Kastrationsrefraktäres Prostatakarzinom (CRPC).

In merely a short period of time the comprehension of castration-resistant prostate cancer has evolved. It is now possible to clearly outline the exact definition and variance of the disease pattern. A wealth of new effective agents can be applied to extend the patient's life span and improve the quality of life. An understanding of the pharmacodynamics and side effects of each substance is of utmost importance for the practical application. In order to use these new medicines in a differentiated manner urologists require continuous education. The evaluation of response to treatment has yet to be satisfyingly verified. Molecular markers still need to be developed and evaluated.

[Prepuce as free transplant]. / Präputialhaut als freies Transplantat.

Graft urethroplasty using free transplants has become a standard procedure in the therapy of complicated urethral strictures. Various types of tissues can be used as graft material and different criteria are important for the suitability of tissues for urethroplasty. It was recognized early on that the prepuce was an easy to harvest tissue with low morbidity and excellent functional results. In this article the suitability of this tissue for functional results will be discussed within the context of the biology of free transplants and the available literature.

[Management of urethral strictures: practical guidelines]. / Management von Harnröhrenstrikturen : Ein praktischer Leitfaden.

For the diagnosis of urethral strictures it is of utmost importance to determine the exact position and length of the strictured area. The optimal method for this purpose is retrograde urethrography which can be combined with a voiding cystourethrography. Endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures is only reasonable for cases with short segment bulbar strictures (<1.5 cm) otherwise recurrence rates are very high. For long segment or recurrent strictures only open urethroplasty provides good results in terms of recurrence-free survival. In these open techniques care must be taken in early postoperative management to obtain the best results.

[Etiology and pathophysiology of benign prostate hyperplasia]. / Ätiologie und Pathophysiologie der benignen Prostatahyperplasie.

The pathogenesis of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is still unclear. It is a common disease affecting exclusively humans in its full clinical appearance. There is a broad variety of possible underlying mechanisms which most likely interact in the pathogenesis of the disease: inflammatory processes taking place predominantly in the stroma and inducing proliferation of all tissues within the transitional zone, an imbalance of androgens and estrogens and their receptors, hyperinsulinemia and hypercholesterolemia (metabolic syndrome) as direct promoters of glandular growth and autosomal dominant inheritance. The detrusor muscle responds to the increased outflow resistance with muscular hypertrophy. Decreased compliance of the bladder wall results in voiding difficulties while electric instability of the hypertrophied detrusor muscle and increased recruiting of otherwise silent afferent fibres cause storage symptoms.

[Focal prostate cancer therapy: capabilities, limitations and prospects]. / Fokale Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms: Möglichkeiten, Limitierungen und Ausblick.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) face the difficult decision between a potential overtreatment by one of the standard therapies and active surveillance (AS) with the potential insecurity regarding cancer control. A focal therapy (FT) implies a treatment of the tumor within the prostate only. METHODS: This review evaluates the current literature and expert opinion of different therapies suited for FT as well as concepts for prostate imaging, biopsy and histopathological evaluation. RESULTS: Currently there is a lack of multicenter, randomized, prospective data on the effectiveness of FT. Nonetheless, the published data indicate a sufficient tumor control with a favorable side effect profile. There are still flaws in the diagnostics with regard to tumor detection and histological evaluation. Multicenter studies are currently recruiting worldwide which will provide new data with a higher level of evidence. CONCLUSION: At present, the effectiveness of FT should not be compared directly to standard radical therapies and FT should only be performed within studies. In cases of cancer progression after FT a salvage treatment should still be possible.