Integrating Palliative Care Assessment Tools to Enhance Understanding of Illness Trajectory in Post-Acute Care and Long-Term Care.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether education and integration of the Gold Standard Framework Proactive Identification Guidance (GSF-PIG) and the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) into care rounds, in post-acute care settings, can facilitate communication between the interprofessional care team to enhance understanding of illness trajectories, identifying those who would benefit from a palliative approach to care. METHODS: Interprofessional care teams received training on the GSF-PIG and PPS which were integrated into weekly care rounds and completed a post-evaluation survey. A chart review was conducted for the 40 patients and residents reviewed with the GSF-PIG and PPS. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and comparisons of characteristics between patients and residents who were grouped as positive or negative on the GFS-PIG surprise question using chi square analyzes and t-tests. RESULTS: The GSF-PIG and PPS were found to enhance communication within care teams and enhance understanding of patient and resident's illness burden. The chart review revealed that patients and residents whom the team would not be surprised if they died within 1 year were older (p = .002), had a lower PPS score (p = .002) and had more indicators of decline (p < .001) compared to patients and residents the team would be surprised if they died within the year. CONCLUSION: Training interprofessional care teams on the utilization and integration of the GSF-PIG and PPS during weekly care rounds helped increase the understanding of patient and resident illness burden and illness trajectory to identify those who may benefit from a palliative approach to care.

Enhancing communication in end-of-life care: a clinical tool translating between the Clinical Frailty Scale and the Palliative Performance Scale.

OBJECTIVES: To create a clinical tool to translate between the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), which geriatrics teams use, and Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), which palliative care teams use, to create a common language and help improve communication between geriatric and palliative care teams. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTINGS: Two academic health centers: inpatient palliative care and chronic care units, an outpatient geriatric clinic, and inpatient referrals to a palliative care consultation service. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (≥65) aged 80.9±8.0, with malignant (51%) and nonmalignant (49%) terminal diagnoses (N=120). MEASUREMENTS: Each participant was assigned four scores: a CFS score each from a geriatric physician and nurse and a PPS score each from a palliative care physician and nurse. Interrater reliability of each measure was calculated using kappa coefficients. For each measure, the mean of physician and nurse scores was used to calculate every possible combination of CFS and PPS scores to determine the combination with maximum agreement. RESULTS: Interrater reliability of each measure was very high for the CFS (weighted κ=0.92) and PPS (weighted κ=0.80). The CFS-PPS score matching that achieved maximum agreement (weighted κ=0.71) was used to create a conversion chart between the two measures. CONCLUSION: This conversion chart is a reliable means of translating scores between the CFS and PPS and is useful for geriatric and palliative care teams collaborating in the care of elderly adults.

Attitudes of terminally ill older adults toward complementary and alternative medicine therapies.

AIM: The aim of this study was to characterize the attitudes of older adults on an inpatient palliative care unit toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 33 inpatients (61 to 98 years old) completed a questionnaire that examined their attitudes toward CAM to determine the acceptability of these therapies. Corresponding questionnaires were gathered from 10 substitute decision makers (SDMs). Preferences for specific CAM modalities were identified. Correlational analyses were performed between interest in CAM therapies and demographic variables and clinical status, including physical and psychological distress. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients (82 percent) were interested in trying CAM therapies. The greatest interest was shown in music therapy (61 percent) and massage therapy (58 percent). All of the SDMs were interested in having CAM therapies available for their loved ones to try. DISCUSSION: Attitudes toward CAM therapies of terminally ill older inpatients and their SDMs are highly favourable. CAM treatments merit closer evaluation as a means of enhancing end-of-life care.