Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prev Med Rep ; 36: 102431, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771374

RESUMO

In individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), comorbid depression leads to increased health care costs and unsatisfactory treatment outcomes. Supporting healthy behaviors and self-efficacy might provide means to prevent depressive symptoms. We assessed the effects of motivational interviewing (MI) - based self-care promotion that specifically targets health behaviors, on depressive symptoms in adults with T2D. We followed PRISMA guidelines and searched Pubmed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cinahl, and Cochrane Library to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to February 2023. Eligible RCTs had to target the T2D adult population, examine MI-based interventions that focus on multiple health behaviors, and measure depressive symptoms on a validated scale. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. After the screening, eleven studies with 2,682 individuals were eligible for the narrative synthesis. A meta-analysis of nine studies favored interventions with a pooled SMD of -0.19 (95% Cl = -0.34 to -0.05, p = 0.008, I2 = 52%). Due to the indirectness and imprecision of the evidence, we assessed the certainty of evidence based on GRADE as low. MI-based self-care promotion with a focus on health behaviors and implemented by a well MI-trained person had a preventive effect on depressive symptoms among adults with T2D. However, the certainty of evidence remained low. In future trials, the effect of MI-based self-care promotion on depression should be studied in clinically depressed populations.

2.
Trials ; 22(1): 344, 2021 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34001230

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Depression is a highly prevalent mental disorder with major public health effects globally. It impairs the quality of life and reduces the ability to work and function, leading to increasing costs of sick leaves and disability pensions. Current treatment strategies focus on biological and psychological pathways while understating the role of lifestyle factors. Epidemiological studies have shown convincing evidence of an inverse relationship between diet quality and depression. However, only limited data are available on the therapeutic effects of diet quality improvement on depression. Using a randomized controlled trial design, our primary aim is to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a behavioral nutrition group intervention compared to a social support intervention in the treatment of depression. METHODS: Participants (N=144, aged 20-65 years) with a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression recruited in collaboration with outpatient care units will be randomized into two arms: Food for Mind (FM) nutrition intervention (n=72) or Bring Good Mood (BGM) social support control group (n=72). Both arms will be provided with 6 group sessions over an 8-week period. FM involves improving diet quality by applying strength-based behavioral nutrition counseling and activities facilitated by a registered dietitian. The control arm comprises a befriending protocol. During the interventions, all participants will continue their treatment for depression as usual. Longitudinal data are collected at baseline, at 8 weeks, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Depressive symptoms, diet quality, eating behavior, ability to work and function, and quality of life are assessed by self-reported questionnaires. A treatment expectancy questionnaire will be administered at baseline and an acceptability questionnaire at 8 weeks. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale is used as the primary endpoint at 1 year. The results will be analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. Economic evaluation includes both cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. Two incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be calculated to evaluate the incremental cost per QALY and the incremental cost per improvement in CES-D. DISCUSSION: If the intervention proves to be cost-effective and acceptable, it be can be implemented in healthcare to support the treatment of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03904771 . Retrospectively registered on 5 April 2019.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/terapia , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...