CT angiography in highly calcified arteries: 2D manual vs. modified automated 3D approach to identify coronary stenoses.

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional axial and manually-oriented reformatted images are traditionally used to analyze coronary data provided by multidetector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA). While apparently more accurate in evaluating calcified vessels, 2D methods are time-consuming compared with automated 3D approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a modified automated 3D approach (using manual vessel isolation and different window and level settings) in a population with high calcium scores who underwent coronary half-millimeter 16-detector-row CT angiography (16 x 0.5-MDCTA). METHODS: ECG-gated 16 x 0.5-MDCTA (16 x 0.5 mm cross-sections, 0.35 x 0.35 x 0.35 mm3 isotropic voxels, 400 ms rotation) was performed after injection of iopamidol (120-ml, 300 mg/ml) in 19 consecutive patients (11 male, 62+/-10 years-old). Native arteries were independently evaluated for >or=50%-stenoses using both manual 2D and modified automated 3D approaches. Stents and bypass grafts were excluded. Conventional coronary angiography was visually analyzed by 2 observers. RESULTS: Median Agatston calcium score was 434. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values for detection of >or=50% coronary stenoses using the 2D and modified 3D approaches were, respectively: 74%/63%, 76%/80%, 45%/34%, and 91%/93% (p=NS for all comparisons). Overall diagnostic accuracies were 75 and 78%, respectively (p=NS). Uninterpretable vessels were, respectively: 37% (77/209) and 35% (73/209) - p=NS. Time to analyze a single study was 160+/-23 and 53+/-11 min, respectively (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This modified automated 3D approach is equivalent to and significantly less time consuming than the traditional manual 2D method for evaluation of >or=50%-stenoses by 16 x 0.5-MDCTA in native coronary arteries of patients with high calcium scores.

Normalization of right ventricular performance and remodeling evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at late follow-up of heart transplantation: relationship between function, exercise capacity and pulmonary vascular resistance.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction remains one of the most prominent complications during the period immediately after heart transplantation (HT); however, late adaptation of the RV has not been well described. The aim of our study was to evaluate RV function and remodeling using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to correlate it with exercise capacity and also with hemodynamic data obtained before HT. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated RV function of 25 heart-transplanted patients, without cardiac allograft vasculopathy, who were documented by negative dobutamine stress echocardiography during late follow-up (Group 1, 6 +/- 4.3 years) using MRI. We then compared Group 1 with a control group consisting of 10 patients, who were < or =1 year post-HT (Group 2), hemodynamically stable, and with the same pre-operative hemodynamic features as Group 1. Their pulmonary arterial systolic blood pressure (PSBP) varied from 17 to 67 mm Hg (43.2 +/- 15.3) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from 1.0 to 5.4 Wood units (2.5 +/- 1.12). The following parameters were studied: RV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and systolic volume (ESV); stroke volume (SV); ejection fraction (EF); and mass (M). We also evaluated the VO2 peak and slope VE/VCO2 values during a treadmill test. Data were analyzed and correlated with the hemodynamic values of PVR and PSBP obtained pre-HT. RESULTS: In Group 1, treadmill evaluation data showed exercise VO2 peak (19.9 +/- 3.19 ml/kg/min) and slope VE/VCO2 (36.9 +/- 4.5) values comparable to those of sedentary individuals; RV variables according to MRI were within normal ranges, with the following mean values for Groups 1 and 2, respectively: RVEDV, 99.6 +/- 4.0 ml vs 127 +/- 16 ml (p = 0.03); RVESV, 42 +/- 2 ml vs 58.5 +/- 9 ml (p = 0.01); RVSV, 57 +/- 3 ml vs 71 +/- 10 ml (p = 0.1); RVEF, 58 +/- 1.4% vs 54 +/- 3.8% (p = 0.29); and RVM, 43.4 +/- 1.9 g vs 74 +/- 8.8 g (p = 0.001). There was no correlation between hemodynamic pulmonary values before HT or any other index of late RV performance, including RV remodeling and hypertrophy, in our study population (p = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to what we would expect for heart transplant patients at late follow-up, the RV may adapt to pulmonary pressure and resistance, with reverse remodeling characterized by volume and mass reduction, leading to normalization of RV function despite abnormal hemodynamic pulmonary values being measured before HT. There was no influence on the low exercise capacity observed in these patients, in the absence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.