Epidemiologic Assessment of Concussions in an NCAA Division I Women's Soccer Team.

BACKGROUND: Among collegiate sports, ice hockey and wrestling have been reported to have the highest rates of concussion injury. Recent literature has shown that among all sports, female soccer players had the highest rate of concussion injury at the high school level. Sport-specific analysis will increase our knowledge of epidemiologic characteristics of this serious injury in young soccer players, where "heading" is commonly involved during participation. HYPOTHESIS: Heading during soccer will be associated with increased frequency of concussion injury in collegiate female players compared with other mechanisms of injury, and concussion injury mechanism and rates will differ by setting of injury (practice or match) and player position. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiologic study. METHODS: This was a retrospective review and epidemiologic analysis of all concussions documented from a single National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I female collegiate soccer team between 2004 and 2017. A total of 381 participants were reviewed, and concussion injury mechanism, setting (practice or match), player position, and number of games and practices missed due to injury were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 25 concussions in 22 players from the 2004 to 2017 seasons were identified, for an annual rate of 1.79 concussions per year. Collisions (36%) followed by headers (20%) were the most common mechanisms. Forwards sustained the most concussions (32%). Injuries were more common in games (56%) than practice (40%). Of note, the most common cause of concussion during practice was headers (40%). Of the concussions documented, 20 (91%) were the player's first concussion. On average, each concussion resulted in a player missing 3.96 games and 12.46 practices. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that concussion rates in female NCAA soccer players vary by position and occur with different frequencies and mechanisms in practice and games. Interventions for concussion avoidance should aim to limit exposure to high-risk activity, including player-to-player contact in games and headers in practice. Although gameplay and collisions can be unpredictable and difficult to control, practice settings can be modified in an attempt to decrease risk.

Risk Factors for Early Subsequent (Revision or Contralateral) ACL Reconstruction: A Retrospective Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Many factors contribute to the risk for subsequent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) within 2 years from the index procedure. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was 2-fold: (1) to evaluate the incidence of subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR at 2 years in a large cohort and (2) to explore the association between patient-specific factors and early subsequent ACLR risk by age group. We hypothesize that 2-year subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR rates will be low and that risk factors for subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR will vary depending on a patient's age group. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Ambulatory Surgery Database was retrospectively reviewed to assess the incidence of 2-year subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR and to identify patient-specific risk factors for early subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR by age group between 2005 and 2014. RESULTS: Of 94,108 patients included, the rate of subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR was highest in patients younger than 21 years (2.4 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 2.3-2.6) and lowest in those older than 40 years (1.3 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4). Younger age, white race (compared with Hispanic in all age groups and Asian in age <21 or >40 years), private insurance if age younger than 21 years, public insurance or worker's compensation claims if age older than 30 years were significantly associated with an increased risk of subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACLR at 2 years. CONCLUSION: Results of the present study provide insight into subsequent (revision or contralateral) ACL reconstruction, which can be used to assess and modify treatment for at-risk patients and highlight the need for data mining to generate clinically applicable research using national and international databases.

The Declining Use of Wrist-Spanning External Fixators.

Background: External fixation has been traditionally used to treat comminuted or open distal radius fractures that are not amenable to open reduction internal fixation. This procedure is associated with a relatively high complication rate and has been used with decreasing frequency in recent years. However, trends in external fixation utilization for the treatment of distal radius fractures have not been described. Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, patients with a distal radius fracture treated with external fixation from 2003 to 2014 were identified. The annual incidence was reported, and hospital and demographic variables associated with external fixation use were determined. Results: During the study period, 593 929 patients with a distal radius fracture were identified, of which 51 766 (8.7%) were treated with a wrist-spanning external fixator. Wrist external fixation for the treatment of distal radius fractures declined steadily from 2003 to 2014. In 2003, external fixation use was highest, accounting for 17.4% of distal radius fractures. By 2014, only 4.9% of distal radius fracture were treated with external fixation. During this period, the incidence of distal radius fractures declined by 6.9% while external fixator utilization decreased by 73.7%. Patients receiving an external fixator were more likely to be male, low-income, and treated in a rural, nonteaching, privately owned hospital. Conclusions: External fixator use for the treatment of distal radius fractures steadily declined during the study period. Males and those with lower incomes treated in rural, nonteaching, and privately owned hospitals are more likely to receive external fixation.

Outpatient total elbow arthroplasty: 90-day outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Interest in outpatient arthroplasty has grown in response to increasing emphasis on the efficient delivery of safe, high-quality medical care. This study evaluated 90-day episode-of-care complications after outpatient total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 28 patients discharged the same day after primary TEA for 90-day episode-of-care complications, reoperations, and readmissions. Postoperative complications and elbow range of motion measurements were recorded and evaluated at the latest follow-up. All patients were contacted and given a satisfaction survey to assess their outpatient experience. Univariate logistic regression was performed for each risk factor to evaluate the risk for major and minor complications. Statistical significance was set as P < .05. RESULTS: Final follow-up data were available for 28 patients at an average of 14 months. Major complications within 90 days of surgery occurred in 7.1% of patients, ulnar nerve paresthesias occurred in 42.8% of patients, and minor wound problems occurred in 39.2% of patients. Five reoperations occurred after the 90-day postoperative period. All ulnar paresthesias and minor wound complications had resolved by the latest follow-up. Univariate regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between smoking and minor wound complications (P = .038). The satisfaction survey had an 85.7% response rate, with 91.7% of patients stating they were happy they went home the same day, and 95.8% feeling more confident and in control of their lives. CONCLUSIONS: The risk profile of carefully selected patients undergoing same-day discharge after TEA is acceptable when combined with close follow-up.

Hip dislocations and concurrent injuries in motor vehicle collisions.

INTRODUCTION: Motor Vehicle Collisions (MVC) can cause high energy hip dislocations associated with serious injury profiles impacting triage. Changes in safety and regulation of restraint devices have likely lowered serious injuries from what was previously reported in the 1990s. This study aims to describe modern-day injury profile of patients with traumatic hip dislocations, with special attention to aortic injury. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained trauma database at an urban level 1 trauma center was conducted. Patients with hip dislocation following MVC between January 2005 and December 2015 were grouped based on seatbelt use and airbag deployment. Patients with unknown restraint use were excluded. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify risk of injury profile between groups. RESULTS: Of 204 patients with hip dislocation after MVC, nearly 57% were unrestrained. Seatbelt alone was used in 36 (17.7%), airbag deployed in 14 (6.9%), and 38 (18.6%) with both. Gender and number of injuries were similar between groups. The most common concomitant injury was acetabular fracture (53.92%) and the abdominopelvic region was the most injured. Use of a seatbelt with airbag deployment was protective of concomitant pelvic ring injury (OR = 0.22). Airbag deployment was significantly protective of lumbar fracture (OR = 0.15) while increasing the likelihood of radial and ulnar fracture or dislocation (OR = 3.27), acetabular fracture (OR = 5.19), and abdominopelvic injury (OR = 5.07). The no restraint group had one patient (0.80%) with an intimal tear of the thoracic aorta identified on CT chest that was successfully medically managed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Hip dislocations are high energy injuries with severe associated injuries despite upgrades in restraint devices. These patients require careful examination and heightened awareness when evaluating for concomitant injuries.