[Testicular Microlithiasis: Update on diagnosis and management.] / Actualidades sobre microlitiasis testicular.

Testicular microlithiasis (TM) is an uncommonurologic condition incidentally diagnosed byscrotal ultrasound. It has been associated with differentdiseases, such as Klinefelter`s syndrome, testicular atrophy,cryptorchidism, testicular torsion, and infertility.However, it can also present in healthy males that haveno associated risk factors. Currently, TM is most oftendetected thanks to the superior resolution of today's ultrasoundequipment, compared with former models. In the1990s, TM was considered a benign condition with noimportant clinical relevance, but later reports associatedit with the development of testicular neoplasias andinfertility. Thus, many authors recommended periodic surveillance with tumor markers and ultrasound imaging,with some even promoting the use of testicular biopsy.The aim of this article is to clearly and specifically presentcurrent information about testicular microlithiasis, toestablish both diagnostic and follow-up indications.

La microlitiasis testicular (MT) es un padecimiento urológico poco frecuente que se diagnostica de forma incidental mediante ltrasonografía escrotal. Ha sido asociado a diversas enfermedades como síndrome de Klinefelter, atrofia testicular, criptorquidia, torsión testicular e infertilidad. Sin embargo, también se puede encontrar en varones sanos sin factores de riesgo asociados. La microlitiasis testicular es detectada con mayor frecuencia en la actualidad, debido a la resolución superior de los equipos de ultrasonido actuales en comparación a los anteriores.  En la década de los  noventa la MT fue considerada una condición benigna sin gran relevancia clínica. Sin embargo, reportes posteriores asociaron este padecimiento al desarrollo de neoplasias testiculares e infertilidad. Por tal motivo muchos autores recomendaban la vigilancia periódica con marcadores tumorales y ultrasonido, e incluso algunos preconizaban el uso de la biopsia testicular. El objetivo del presente articulo de revisión es exponer de manera clara y especifica la evidencia actual de la microlitiasis testicular para así establecer las pautas tanto diagnósticas como de seguimiento.

Actualidades sobre microlitiasis testicular / No disponible

La microlitiasis testicular (MT) es un padecimiento urológico poco frecuente que se diagnostica de forma incidental mediante ltrasonografía escrotal. Ha sido asociado a diversas enfermedades como síndrome de Klinefelter, atrofia testicular, criptorquidia, torsión testicular e infertilidad. Sin embargo, también se puede encontrar en varones sanos sin factores de riesgo asociados. La microlitiasis testicular es detectada con mayor frecuencia en la actualidad, debido a la resolución superior de los equipos de ultrasonido actuales en comparación a los anteriores. En la década de los noventa la MT fue considerada una condición benigna sin gran relevancia clínica. Sin embargo, reportes posteriores asociaron este padecimiento al desarrollo de neoplasias testiculares e infertilidad. Por tal motivo muchos autores recomendaban la vigilancia periódica con marcadores tumorales y ultrasonido, e incluso algunos preconizaban el uso de la biopsia testicular. El objetivo del presente articulo de revisión es exponer de manera clara y especifica la evidencia actual de la microlitiasis testicular para así establecer las pautas tanto diagnósticas como de seguimiento

Testicular microlithiasis (TM) is an uncommon urologic condition incidentally diagnosed by scrotal ultrasound. It has been associated with different diseases, such as Klinefelter's syndrome, testicular atrophy, cryptorchidism, testicular torsion, and infertility. However, it can also present in healthy males that have no associated risk factors. Currently, TM is most often detected thanks to the superior resolution of today’s ultrasound equipment, compared with former models. In the 1990s, TM was considered a benign condition with no important clinical relevance, but later reports associated it with the development of testicular neoplasias and infertility. Thus, many authors recommended periodic surveillance with tumor markers and ultrasound imaging, with some even promoting the use of testicular biopsy. The aim of this article is to clearly and specifically present current information about testicular microlithiasis, toestablish both diagnostic and follow-up indications

Efficacy of Tamsulosin, Oxybutynin, and their combination in the control of double-j stent-related lower urinary tract symptoms.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Indwelling double J ureteral stents are used routinely in the resolution of ureteral obstruction caused by different etiologies. Evaluation of urinary symptoms related to double-J stent, indicate that these affect 73-90% of patients. We conducted a prospective, randomized study, to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin, oxybutinin and combination therapy in improving the urinary symptoms. METHODS: Patients who underwent ureteral stent placement after ureterolithotripsy (total 51), were randomized into three groups: Group I: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg. Once per day(17 patients), Group II: Oxybutinin 5 mg. once per day (17 patients), Group III: Tamsulosin+ oxybutynin once per day (17 patients). All the groups received the drugs for three weeks and completed a Spanish validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at day 7 and 21. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA showed mean urinary symptom index score was 22.3 vs. 15.5 in group three (p<0.001) at day 7 and 21 respectively. The mean work performance index was 6.6 vs 8.1 (p=0.049) favoring tamsulosin group, the mean sexual score was 0.5 vs 1.5 (p=0.03). Among additional problems the mean was 7.2 vs 6.2 (p=0.03). No significant difference was noted among pain and general health index. No side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with tamsulosin and oxybutynin improved irritative symptoms and work performance as well as sexual matters. Combination therapy should be considered for patients who complained of stent related symptoms.

Efficacy of Tamsulosin, Oxybutynin, and their combination in the control of double-j stent-related lower urinary tract symptoms

ABSTRACT Introduction and objective Indwelling double J ureteral stents are used routinely in the resolution of ureteral obstruction caused by different etiologies. Evaluation of urinary symptoms related to double-J stent, indicate that these affect 73-90% of patients. We conducted a prospective, randomized study, to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin, oxybutinin and combination therapy in improving the urinary symptoms. Methods Patients who underwent ureteral stent placement after ureterolithotripsy (total 51), were randomized into three groups: Group I: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg. once per day(17 patients), Group II: Oxybutinin 5 mg. once per day (17 patients), Group III: Tamsulosin+ oxybutynin once per day (17 patients). All the groups received the drugs for three weeks and completed a Spanish validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at day 7 and 21. Results Repeated measures ANOVA showed mean urinary symptom index score was 22.3 vs. 15.5 in group three (p<0.001) at day 7 and 21 respectively. The mean work performance index was 6.6 vs 8.1 (p=0.049) favoring tamsulosin group, the mean sexual score was 0.5 vs 1.5 (p=0.03). Among additional problems the mean was 7.2 vs 6.2 (p=0.03). No significant difference was noted among pain and general health index. No side effects were reported. Conclusions Combination therapy with tamsulosin and oxybutynin improved irritative symptoms and work performance as well as sexual matters. Combination therapy should be considered for patients who complained of stent related symptoms.

Emphysematous pyelonephritis: multicenter clinical and therapeutic experience in Mexico.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN), the impact of different treatment modalities, and to determine risk factors associated with mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of EPN from 3 tertiary care institutions in Mexico. The diagnosis was confirmed with computed tomographic scan. Treatment was classified as follows: medical management (MM), minimally invasive, and surgical. Demographic, clinical, biochemical, and radiological characteristics were assessed and compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. Comparison was assessed using 1-way analysis of variance and chi-square. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors. Main end point was mortality. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were included (49 women and 13 men), with a mean age of 53.9 years. The most common comorbidities were diabetes (69.3%) and hypertension (40.3%). Escherichia coli was the most common isolated microorganism (62.7%). MM was provided to 24.2%, minimally invasive treatment to 51.6%, open drainage to 19.3%, and emergency nephrectomy to 4.8%. Overall mortality was 14.5% and was similar among different treatment modalities (P=.06). Survivors were younger (P=.004), had lower creatinine (P=.002), and better estimated glomerular filtration rate (P=.007). In univariate analysis, age (P=.009), creatinine (P=.009), and need for nephrectomy (P=.03) were associated with mortality. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, creatinine (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.03-2.35, P=.03) and nephrectomy (odds ratio 9.7, 95% confidence interval 1.007-93.51, P=.049) remained significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: EPN needs an aggressive MM and stepwise approach; nephrectomy should be the last resort of treatment. Creatinine level and need for nephrectomy are the strongest predictors of mortality according our analysis.

Nephron-sparing surgery for clear cell carcinoma in a solitary functional kidney. Case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of nephron-sparing surgery, patients with small renal masses and diseases affecting overall renal function have greatly benefited. CLINICAL CASE: We present the case of a 62-year-old male with a 6-cm left renal tumor in the medial parahilar segment with right renal unit functionally excluded, secondary to chronic obstruction due to ureteral lithiasis. Right ureteroscopy was performed with pneumatic lithotripsy. Despite localization and size of the tumor, left nephron-sparing surgery was performed in order to preserve renal function. Follow-up of the patient demonstrates no tumor activity. CONCLUSIONS: Open nephron-sparing surgery has been the standard treatment for small renal masses with peripheral localization; however, in specific cases with deteriorated renal function and tumors >5 cm close to the renal hilum, certain risk must be taken in order to perform this procedure that has proven to be highly effective in preserving renal function. Open nephron-sparing surgery represents a highly effective procedure in small renal masses with a nonfunctional contralateral kidney.