Early Postoperative Complications of Robotic-assisted Versus Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The current work was designed to evaluate whether robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery is associated with a different incidence of early postoperative complications compared with the traditional minimally invasive approach. DESIGN: A retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted. SETTING: The study was performed in an academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 375 patients who underwent standard thoracoscopic minimally invasive mitral valve surgery and robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery between April 2014 and November 2022 were enrolled. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After adjustment using propensity score analysis, 98 patients from each group were identified. Patients who underwent robotic surgery presented a similar rate of early complications to patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. Nevertheless, they showed shorter intensive care unit and postoperative hospital stays. Finally, patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery were more frequently discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a similar incidence of early complications in robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery compared with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery; conversely, patients receiving robotic-assisted surgery were discharged earlier, and more frequently discharged home.

Risk Factors for Higher Postoperative Myocardial Injury in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Patients: A Cohort Study.

Background: Postoperative myocardial injury, as detected by an elevated concentration of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), is a common complication in cardiac surgery that may be linked to mortality. The primary aim of this study was to assess the risk factors associated with increased myocardial injury in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Methods: In this retrospective monocentric cohort study, we analyzed all patients who underwent elective minimally invasive mitral valve surgery between January 2019 and December 2022 and were subsequently admitted to our intensive care unit. The study population was divided into two groups based on the peak hs-cTnI level: the "lower myocardial injury" group comprised patients whose peak serum hs-cTnI level was less than 499 times the 99th percentile, while the "higher myocardial injury" group included those patients who exhibited hs-cTnI levels equal to or greater than 500 times the 99th percentile. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with higher myocardial injury. Results: In our final analysis, we enrolled 316 patients. Patients with higher myocardial injury (48; 15%) more frequently had a preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥3 compared to those with lower myocardial injury [33 (69%) vs. 128 (48%); p < 0.01-OR 2.41 (95% CI 1.24-4.64); p < 0.01]. Furthermore, cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time were significantly longer in the higher myocardial injury group compared to the lower myocardial injury group [117 (91-145) vs. 86 (74-100) min; p < 0.01-OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.06); p < 0.01]. Moreover, patients who underwent robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery experienced lower myocardial injury rates [9 (19%) vs. 102 (38%); p = 0.01-OR 0.38 (95% CI 0.18-0.81); p = 0.01] than others. These findings remained consistent after adjustment in multivariate logistic regression. In terms of postoperative outcomes, patients with higher myocardial injury exhibited the highest lactate peak in the first 24 h, a higher incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury and a longer duration of mechanical ventilation. Although no patients died in either group, those with higher myocardial injury experienced a longer hospital length of stay. Conclusions: Higher myocardial injury is relatively common after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Prolonged aortic cross-clamp duration and higher NYHA class were independently associated with myocardial injury, while robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery was independently associated with lower postoperative myocardial injury.

Learning Curve Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Mitral Valve Repair with COVID-19 Exogenous Factor: A Single Center Experience.

Background and objective Renewed interest in robot-assisted cardiac procedures has been demonstrated by several studies. However, concerns have been raised about the need for a long and complex learning curve. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 might have affected the learning curve of these procedures. In this study, we investigated the impact of COVID-19 on the learning curve of robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery (RAMVS). The aim was to understand whether or not the benefits of RAMVS are compromised by its learning curve. Materials and Methods Between May 2019 and March 2023, 149 patients underwent RAMVS using the Da Vinci® X Surgical System at the Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Bergamo, Italy. The selection of patients enrolled in the study was not influenced by case complexity. Regression models were used to formalize the learning curves, where preoperative data along with date of surgery and presence of COVID-19 were treated as the input covariates, while intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed as output variables. Results The age of patients was 59.1 ± 13.3 years, and 70.5% were male. In total, 38.2% of the patients were operated on during the COVID-19 pandemic. The statistical analysis showed the positive impact of the learning curve on the trend of postoperative parameters, progressively reducing times and other key indicators. Focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic, statistical analysis did not recognize an impact on postoperative outcomes, although it became clear that variables not directly related to the intervention, especially ICU hours, were strongly influenced by hospital logistics during COVID-19. Conclusions Understanding the learning curve of robotic surgical procedures is essential to ensure their effectiveness and benefits. The learning curve involves not only surgeons but also other health care providers, and establishing a stable team in the early stage, as in our case, is important to shorten the duration. In fact, an exogenous factor such as the COVID-19 pandemic did not affect the robotic program despite the fact that the pandemic occurred early in the program.

Evaluation of robotic-assisted mitral surgery in a contemporary experience.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety/effectiveness of a recently established robotic-assisted mitral surgery program. METHODS: Cohort study with prospective collection of clinical data of 59 consecutive recipients (May 2019-August 2021) of robotic-assisted (fourth-generation platform, DaVinci X) mitral valve repair for degenerative disease, using a totally endoscopic technique. Patients' selection was based on defined anatomical and clinical criteria. We established a dedicated multidisciplinary protocol to facilitate postoperative fast-tracking, and a systematic in-house clinical and echocardiographic follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 postoperative months. RESULTS: All patients (89.8% men, average age 58 ±â€Š12 years) received mitral valve repair; there was no operative mortality, one conversion to sternotomy (1.7%) and one stroke (1.7%). Extubation within the operative theater occurred in 28.8%; average mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay was 2.8 ±â€Š4.1 and 32.5 ±â€Š15.8 h (after exclusion of one outlier, learning-curve period, suffering from perioperative stroke); average postoperative hospital stay was 6.8 ±â€Š3.4 days and 96.6% of patients were discharged home. One patient was transfused (1.7%); there were no other complications. Follow-up revealed stability of the results of mitral repair, with one (1.7%) persistent (>2+/4+) mitral regurgitation, and stability of coaptation height over time. We observed optimal functional results (class I was 98% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months). Quarterly case load consistently increased during the experience. CONCLUSION: This initial experience suggests the reliability and clinical safety of a recently established local robotic-assisted mitral surgery. This strategy can facilitate faster postoperative recovery, and its positioning in the therapeutic armamentarium needs to be defined.

Less invasive aortic valve replacement using the trifecta bioprosthesis.

Objectives. The safety and effectiveness of the Trifecta GT bioprosthesis (introduced in 2016) in less invasive aortic valve replacement are scarcely investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the immediate and initial follow-up results of this device in the context of less invasive surgery. We discuss patient-specific strategies for the selection of the surgical approach. Methods. A retrospective review of 133 patients undergoing AVR with the Trifecta GT through three less invasive accesses (UMS, Upper ministernotomy; RMS, Reversed ministernotomy; RAMT, Right anterior minithoracotomy) was performed. In-hospital, follow-up and hemodynamic performance (PPM, Patient-prosthesis mismatch) data were collected. Results. Among patients, 79% received UMS, 11% RMS and 10% RAMT. Selection of approach was based on preoperative anatomical analysis (CT-scan) and planned concomitant procedures. There was no operative mortality, no valve-related adverse events. There were 36 concomitant procedures. No significant intergroup differences occurred in cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic clamp, mechanical ventilation time, ICU stay and average bleeding. There were two cases of moderate PPM (1.5%) and no instances of severe PPM; there were no significant (≥2/4) perivalvular leaks. Average mean gradient at discharge was 8 ± 3 mmHg. At follow-up (average: 2.5 ± 0.9 years, 100% complete, 315 patient years) there was no mortality and no valve-related adverse event. Hemodynamic performance was maintained at follow-up. Conclusions. The optimal device for less invasive AVR needs to be individualized, as well as the selection of the surgical approach. The use of the Trifecta GT bioprosthesis appears to be reproductible whatever less invasive approach is employed, with confirmed excellent hemodynamic performance.

[Towards the age of computer-assisted surgery: how to establish a robotic-assisted mitral surgery program with a last-generation platform]. / Verso l'era della chirurgia computer-assistita: come iniziare un programma di chirurgia robotica della valvola mitrale.

Mitral valve therapy is rapidly evolving. In this context, there is a clear evolution towards the diffusion of minimally invasive techniques for surgical mitral valve replacement or repair, namely in the context of primary mitral regurgitation. The robotic-assisted mitral surgery strategy allows the greatest reduction in surgical trauma to the patients, as well as improved ergonomics and video-assistance for performance of the mitral procedure. We currently observe a rapid diffusion of robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery across Europe, which rightfully forms part of the treatment modalities available to multidisciplinary Mitral Teams. However, the development of a robotic cardiac surgery program should be established maintaining reproducibility and patient safety. Adequate training and preparation are essential to initiate and sustain a robotic-assisted mitral valve surgery program. Herein, we address its main steps: fundamentals, multidisciplinary approach, risk management, team management, development and consolidation. We also present the initial clinical results in our Center, and analyze some learning-curve aspects.

Continued follow-up of the free margin running suture technique for mitral repair.

OBJECTIVES: The free margin running suture (FMRS) technique was recently proposed to treat complex degenerative mitral lesions. Limited follow-up data are available. We evaluated the midterm reliability of this technique and the associated mitral valve parameters using rest/stress echocardiography. METHODS: One-hundred-eight consecutive patients at 2 European centres were included. Prospective follow-up was performed (266.1 patient-years, average duration 2.5 ± 2.5 years). Echocardiographic scans at rest were obtained for all patients at hospital discharge and at follow-up. Stress echocardiography was also performed in 17 patients. RESULTS: There were no operative deaths. FMRS was performed through a right minithoracotomy in 86.1% of patients, with a robotic-assisted technique in 5.6% and through a sternotomy in 8.3%. Bileaflet disease was noted in 31.4%. One patient (0.9%) presented a 2+/4+ residual mitral regurgitation at discharge; lower-degree or no residual regurgitation was noted in the remaining patients. At the follow-up examination, 1 patient (0.9%) presented with a 2+/4+ mitral regurgitation. Coaptation length at discharge versus that at follow-up was 1.3 ± 0.2 vs 1.3 ± 0.1 cm (P = 0.13); the average transmitral gradient was 4.8 ± 1.5 vs 3.5 ± 0.9 mmHg (P < 0.001). In a subpopulation, follow-up echocardiography indicated that the average transmitral gradient at rest versus that at peak effort was 3.2 ± 0.7 vs 5.1 ± 1.3 mmHg (P < 0.001), with no appearance of significant mitral regurgitation and marginally significant increases in pulmonary artery systolic pressures (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate effectiveness and reproducibility of FMRS, with stability of valve function at midterm. FMRS was also associated with promising outcomes in diastolic performance both at rest and during exercise.

Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fragility Fractures in Patients with COVID-19 During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Northern Italy.

BACKGROUND: From February 20 to April 2020, the coronavirus SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome)-CoV-2 spread in northern Italy, drastically challenging the care capacities of the national health care system. Unprepared for this emergency, hospitals have quickly reformulated paths of assistance in an effort to guarantee treatment for infected patients. Orthopaedic departments have been focused on elderly traumatology, especially the treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the orthopaedic management strategy for femoral fragility fractures in COVID-19-positive patients with the hypothesis that operative treatment may contribute to the overall stability of the patient. METHODS: Sixteen patients affected by proximal femoral fracture and a recent history of fever, shortness of breath, and desaturation were admitted to the emergency room. Thoracic computed tomography (CT) and oropharyngeal swabs confirmed that they were positive for COVID-19, requiring hospitalization and prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin. RESULTS: Three patients died before surgery because of severe respiratory insufficiency and multiple-organ-failure syndrome. Ten patients underwent surgery on the day after admission, whereas 3 patients had suspended their use of direct thrombin inhibitors and needed surgery to be delayed until the third day after admission. In all patients except 1, we noted an improvement in terms of O2 saturation and assisted respiration. In 9 patients, hemodynamic and respiratory stability was observed at an average of 7 days postoperatively. Four patients who underwent surgical treatment died of respiratory failure on the first day after surgery (1 patient), the third day after surgery (2 patients), or the seventh day after surgery (1 patient). CONCLUSIONS: We noted a stabilization of respiratory parameters in 12 COVID-19-positive patients who underwent surgery treatment of proximal femoral fractures. We believe that in elderly patients with COVID-19 who have proximal femoral fractures, surgery may contribute to the overall stability of the patient, seated mobilization, improvement in physiological ventilation, and general patient comfort in bed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Viscoelastic Blood Tests Use in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Regression, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative hemorrhage in cardiac surgery is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Standard laboratory tests fail as predictors for bleeding in the surgical setting. The use of viscoelastic (VE) hemostatic assays thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) could be an advantage in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze the effects (benefits and harms) of VE-guided transfusion practice in cardiac surgery patients. DESIGN: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. SETTING: For this study, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration database were searched, and only randomized controlled trials were included. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the standards set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, using a random-effects model. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised adult cardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: VE-hemostatic assays transfusion algorithm compared with transfusion algorithms based on clinicians' discretion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seven comparative randomized controlled trials were considered, including a total of 1,035 patients (522 patients in whom a TEG- or ROTEM-based transfusion algorithm was used). In patients treated according to VE-guided algorithms, red blood cell (odds ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.99; p: 0.04; I2: 66%) and fresh frozen plasma transfusions (risk difference 0.22; 95% CI: 0.11-0.33; p < 0.0001; I2: 79%) use was reduced; platelets transfusion was not reduced (odds ratio 0.61; 95% CI: 0.32-1.15; p: 0.12; I2 74%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the use of VE assays in cardiac surgical patients is effective in reducing allogenic blood products exposure, postoperative bleeding at 12 and 24 hours after surgery, and the need for redo surgery unrelated to surgical bleeding.

Versatility of endoaortic balloon occlusion device for less invasive management of complex and reoperative cardiac cases.

Heart Teams are increasingly confronted with decision-making in anatomically and clinically complex surgical candidates. Herein, we discuss the versatility of the endoaortic occlusion device (Intraclude; Edwards Lifesciences Inc) for the management of a various array of complex primary and reoperative cardiac cases. Three clinical scenarios are illustrated (ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm, mitral valve surgery after previous CABG, extensive thoracic aortic surgery with continuous visceral perfusion), suggesting the effectiveness of the patient-specific strategy to minimize operative morbidity. Evolution of surgical techniques needs to be considered in decision-making among alternative treatment strategies.

Whole body perfusion in patients undergoing frozen elephant trunk for type A acute aortic dissections.

The Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) can be adopted in selected type A acute aortic dissections (TAAAD). During FET, a prolonged distal circulatory arrest exposes the spine and visceral organs to potential ischemic injuries. Antegrade distal aortic perfusion (ADAP) could minimize this risk: we describe the technical aspects of the simultaneous use of antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) and ADAP achieving a "Whole Body Perfusion" (WBP) during FET.