The D-amino acid oxidase inhibitor luvadaxistat improves mismatch negativity in patients with schizophrenia in a randomized trial.

Several attempts have been made to enhance N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor function in schizophrenia, but they have yielded mixed results. Luvadaxistat, a D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) inhibitor that increases the glutamate co-agonist D-serine levels, is being developed for the treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. We conducted a biomarker study in patients, assessing several endpoints related to physiological outcomes of NMDA receptor modulation to determine whether luvadaxistat affects neural circuitry biomarkers relevant to NMDA receptor function and schizophrenia. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, two-period crossover phase 2a study assessing luvadaxistat 50 mg and 500 mg for 8 days in 31 patients with schizophrenia. There were no treatment effects of luvadaxistat at either dose in eyeblink conditioning, a cerebellar-dependent learning measure, compared with placebo. We observed a nominally significant improvement in mismatch negativity (MMN) and a statistical trend to improvement for auditory steady-state response at 40 Hz, in both cases with 50 mg, but not with 500 mg, compared with placebo. Although the data should be interpreted cautiously owing to the small sample size, they suggest that luvadaxistat can improve an illness-related circuitry biomarker at doses associated with partial DAAO inhibition. These results are consistent with 50 mg, but not higher doses, showing a signal of efficacy in cognitive endpoints in a larger phase 2, 12-week study conducted in parallel. Thus, MMN responses after a short treatment period may predict cognitive function improvement. MMN and ASSR should be considered as biomarkers in early trials addressing NMDA receptor hypofunction.

Clinical Bioavailability of the Novel BACE1 Inhibitor Lanabecestat (AZD3293): Assessment of Tablet Formulations Versus an Oral Solution and the Impact of Gastric pH on Pharmacokinetics.

The relative bioavailability of lanabecestat administered as 2 tablet formulations versus an oral solution was investigated. This phase 1 single-center, open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover study involved healthy male and nonfertile female subjects aged 18-55 years (NCT02039180). Subjects received a single 50-mg lanabecestat dose as solution, tablet A, or tablet B on day 1 of each crossover period; 14 of 16 subjects completed the study. Relative bioavailability based on plasma lanabecestat AUC0-∞ (area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from zero to infinity) geometric mean ratio versus oral solution (primary variable) was: tablet A, 1.052 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.001-1.106); tablet B, 1.040 (0.989-1.093). These 90%CIs for geometric mean ratios are within accepted standard bioequivalence boundaries for all other pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for both lanabecestat and metabolite (AZ13569724). All 3 formulations had similar plasma lanabecestat concentration-time profiles. Six adverse events were reported by 6 subjects (37.5%, all mild). GastroPlus modeling predicted a negligible impact of gastric pH changes on systemic PK (up to pH 7.4). Both tablet formulations fall within standard accepted bioequivalence criteria versus the oral solution. A single 50-mg lanabecestat dose was well tolerated as a solution or tablet formulation in this population.

Early-stage comparative effectiveness: randomized controlled trial with histamine inverse agonist MK-7288 in excessive daytime sleepiness patients.

Histaminergic neurons are regulators of the sleep-wake cycle. We evaluated the alerting effects of MK-7288 (10, 20 mg), a novel histamine-3 receptor inverse agonist (H3RIA), along with modafinil (200 mg), a standard treatment, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of 56 patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Efficacy was assessed using maintenance of wakefulness tests (MWT) and car driving simulation tests. MK-7288 and modafinil significantly prolonged MWT sleep latency (improvements vs. placebo of 8.1 to 8.2 min for MK-7288 and 10.2 min for modafinil), and improved car driving simulation standard deviation of lane position (reduction vs. placebo of -0.1 m for each treatment). MK-7288 was associated with more insomnia (29%) than modafinil (9%) and placebo (6%). The study demonstrated the potential of the H3RIA mechanism for treating EDS, but did not show efficacy differentiation from modafinil. Early-stage comparative effectiveness can help prevent late-stage failure and increase the cost-effectiveness of drug development.