Uroepithelium in a colonic diverticulum.

Giant colonic diverticula are rare entities and often present in adulthood as acute diverticulitis. The authors present a case of giant colonic pseudodiverticulum lined with uroepithelium causing bowel obstruction in a neonate. The presence of uroepithelium in a colonic pseudodiverticuium remains unexplained and to the authors' knowledge unreported. This heterotopic tissue may be a result of an embryonic rest or could be urachal in origin adhering initially to the colon and eventually detaching from the umbilicus. These lesions should be resected because of the risk of infection, perforation, or obstruction.

Cloacal exstrophy: a unified management plan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The belief that patients with cloacal exstrophy have a short and therefore useless colon is all too common. Frequently, the colon is used for urinary or vaginal reconstruction, and the possibility of a pull-through is lost. In the authors' experience, the use of a unified management plan allowed most patients to undergo pull-through and avoid a permanent stoma. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were treated for cloacal exstrophy in the authors' institution from 1985 through 1999. In all patients, bladder closure, omphalocele repair, and creation of a colostomy were performed at birth. All available colon, no matter how small, was incorporated into the fecal stream. After at least 1 year, patients were assessed for the ability to form solid stool through their stoma. Normal colonic length, capacity to form solid stool, or success with a bowel management regimen through the stoma were considered indications for pull-through. Genitourinary reconstruction was contingent on the colorectal plan. RESULTS: Colonic length ranged from normal in 12 patients, 40 to 70 cm in 3 patients, 10 to 30 cm in 4 patients, and less than 10 cm in 2 patients. All 25 patients underwent pull-through. Three are totally continent, 4 are continent with occasional soiling, 11 remain clean with a bowel management regimen, and 4 are too young to assess. One patient was clean, but now refuses bowel management. Two early patients, both with less than 10 cm of colon, now have ileostomies. CONCLUSIONS: During neonatal repair, a colostomy should be formed incorporating all pieces of colon, no matter how small. With time, most patients will be able to form solid stool, and a pull-through should be undertaken if that ability exists. Decisions regarding genitourinary reconstruction should be made only after the gastrointestinal plan is established to achieve the optimal use of available bowel.

The nonoperative management of fistula-in-ano.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Fistulotomy is the accepted treatment for infants with perianal fistula. Although recurrence rates range from 0% to 68%. Based on the experience of a senior colleague who noted that babies suffering from perianal fistula follow a self-limited course the authors decided to determine if this observation was accurate. METHODS: A conservative approach to perianal abscess and fistula was used prospectively in 18 male infants. Abscesses were to be drained only if the baby was very uncomfortable or febrile. Once a fistula developed the authors continued observation until the fistula healed. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD. Mean follow-up period was 37 months. RESULTS: Mean age at onset of symptoms was 4 +/- 3 months. Fistulas developed in 14 patients (77%). All fistulas healed without operation. Four patients had abscesses drained for discomfort (n = 3) or fever (n = 1). No patient required antibiotics. Mean duration of symptoms was 6 +/- 4 months. Four patients in whom fistulas did not form healed after incision (n = 3) or spontaneous drainage (n = 1). All patients currently are asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy neonates, perianal abscess and fistula are self-limited conditions rarely requiring surgical drainage and not requiring antibiotics. The conservative management of perianal abscess and fistula in healthy infants appears to be safe and effective.