Effect of prosthetic alignment changes on socket reaction moment impulse during walking in transtibial amputees.

The alignment of a lower limb prosthesis affects the way load is transferred to the residual limb through the socket, and this load is critically important for the comfort and function of the prosthesis. Both magnitude and duration of the moment are important factors that may affect the residual limb health. Moment impulse is a well-accepted measurement that incorporates both factors via moment-time integrals. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of alignment changes on the socket reaction moment impulse in transtibial prostheses. Ten amputees with transtibial prostheses participated in this study. The socket reaction moment impulse was measured at a self-selected walking speed using a Smart Pyramid in 25 alignment conditions, including a nominal alignment (clinically aligned by a prosthetist), as well as angle malalignments of 2°, 4° and 6° (abduction, adduction, extension and flexion) and translation malalignments of 5 mm, 10 mm and 15 mm (lateral, medial, anterior and posterior). The socket reaction moment impulse of the nominal alignment was compared for each condition. The relationship between the alignment and the socket reaction moment impulse was clearly observed in the coronal angle, coronal translation and sagittal translation alignment changes. However, this relationship was not evident in the sagittal angle alignment changes. The results of this study suggested that the socket reaction moment impulse could potentially serve as a valuable parameter to assist the alignment tuning process for transtibial prostheses. Further study is needed to investigate the influence of the socket reaction moment impulse on the residual limb health.

Effect of alignment changes on socket reaction moments while walking in transtibial prostheses with energy storage and return feet.

BACKGROUND: Energy storage and return feet are designed for active amputees. However, little is known about the socket reaction moments in transtibial prostheses with energy storage and return feet. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of alignment changes on the socket reaction moments during gait while using the energy storage and return feet. METHODS: A Smart Pyramid™ was used to measure the socket reaction moments in 10 subjects with transtibial prostheses while walking under 25 alignment conditions, including a nominal alignment (as defined by conventional clinical methods), as well as angle malalignments of 2°, 4° and 6° (flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction) and translation malalignments of 5mm, 10mm and 15mm (anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial) referenced from the nominal alignment. The socket reaction moments of the nominal alignment were compared with each malalignment. FINDINGS: Both coronal and sagittal alignment changes demonstrated systematic effects on the socket reaction moments. In the sagittal plane, angle and translation alignment changes demonstrated significant differences (P<0.05) in the minimum moment, the moment at 45% of stance and the maximum moment for some comparisons. In the coronal plane, angle and translation alignment changes demonstrated significant differences (P<0.05) in the moment at 30% and 75% of stance for all comparisons. INTERPRETATION: The alignment may have systematic effects on the socket reaction moments in transtibial prostheses with energy storage and return feet. The socket reaction moments could potentially be a useful biomechanical parameter to evaluate the alignment of the transtibial prostheses.

The relationship between femoral periprosthetic cortical bone geometry and porosity after total hip arthroplasty.

Stress shielding from the presence of a femoral component can cause adverse changes to cortical bone geometry and porosity leading to increased fracture risk in the periprosthetic cortical bone. The objectives of this study were to determine if porosity increased after total hip arthroplasty along the principal axes, and to determine if a relationship existed between cortical bone porosity and geometry. Ten postmortem donors allowed comparisons of implanted femurs to the contralateral nonimplanted femurs. Transverse cross-sections of the femur were taken at 25, 45, 65, and 85% along the length of the femoral component. The cortical bone principal axes' location (degrees) and rigidity values (mm(4)) were based on cortical bone geometry by using digitized images of the cortical bone cross-sections. Percent porosity was measured along the principal axes using backscatter electron imaging. Cortical bone porosity increased in the more distal sections of the implanted femurs by approximately 3%, but did not preferentially increase along a particular principal axis. No correlation was found between changes in porosity and rigidity values. In conclusion, the porosity increases in the implanted femurs may have regionally reduced cortical bone strength. The locations of higher porosity did not appear related to the cortical bone geometry.