Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJOG ; 127(4): 438-446, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31802594

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study if childhood emotional, physical and sexual abuse are determinants for having an unplanned pregnancy, if the categories of abuse interact, and if a potential bias due to the selection of the participants (collider stratification bias) could explain the effect of childhood abuse. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study is based on the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and uses data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. SAMPLE: Women participating in the MoBa for the first time, ≥18 years of age who responded to questions regarding childhood abuse and pregnancy planning (n = 76 197). METHODS: Data were collected using questionnaires. We conducted analyses using modified Poisson regressions and the relative excess risks due to interaction (RERI). Sensitivity analyses were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: An unplanned pregnancy (yes/no). RESULTS: Exposure to childhood emotional (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.14, 95% CI 1.10-1.19), physical (adjusted RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.18) and sexual (adjusted RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.27) abuse increased the risk of having an unplanned pregnancy. The effects could not be explained by the collider stratification bias. The different combinations of categories of abuse did not show any interaction effects. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood emotional, physical and sexual abuses separately increase the risk of having an unplanned pregnancy. The results indicate that victims of childhood abuse are in greater need of support to achieve their reproductive goals. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Childhood abuse increases the risk of having an unplanned pregnancy. #reproductivehealth #epitwitter.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes Adultos de Maus-Tratos Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Maus-Tratos Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez não Planejada , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 26(5): 504-11, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23294051

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to examine the agreement between measurements of standing height and self-reported height, height measured with a sliding caliper, and height estimated from either demispan or knee height in elderly patients. METHODS: Fifty-five patients (mean age 79 years) at a Swedish hospital were included in this observational study. The participants' heights were evaluated as the standing height, self-reported height, height measured in a recumbent position with a sliding caliper, and height estimated from the demispan or knee height. RESULTS: The measurements made with a sliding caliper in the recumbent position agreed most closely with the standing height. Ninety-five percent of the individuals' differences from standing height were within an interval of +1.1 to -4.8 cm (limits of agreement). Self-reported height and height estimated from knee height differed relatively strongly from standing height. The limits of agreement were +5.2 to -9.8 cm and +9.4 to -6.2 cm, respectively. The widest distribution of differences was found in the height estimated from the demispan, with limits of agreements from +11.2 to -9.3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: When measuring the height of patients who find it difficult to stand upright, a sliding caliper should be the method of choice, and the second choice should be self-reported height or the height estimated from knee height. Estimating height from the demispan should be the method of last resort.


Assuntos
Antropometria/métodos , Estatura , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Autorrelato
3.
Br J Surg ; 97(5): 765-71, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20186996

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has emerged as a new treatment modality for inguinal hernia repair. The aim of the present study was to analyse its long-term costs in relation to those of open repair. METHODS: A randomized multicentre study comparing totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair (TEP) with open repair by the Lichtenstein procedure was performed on men with a primary inguinal hernia. Long-term data on recurrences and complications up to 5 years after operation were collected. Taking treatment costs into consideration, a cost-minimization analysis was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 1370 patients had an inguinal hernia repair, 665 in the TEP and 705 in the Lichtenstein group. The total hospital cost for the index operation was 710.6 euro higher for TEP repair (P < 0.001). Including costs associated with recurrences and complications, this difference increased to 795.1 euro (P < 0.001). Taking community costs into account, the difference decreased by 503.1 euro to 292.0 euro (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: This cost-minimization analysis, including complications, reoperations and community costs during follow-up of 5 years, showed that laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair had a small but significant increase in overall costs compared with open repair.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hérnia Inguinal/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Telas Cirúrgicas/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...