Functional somatic symptoms in youths in general practice: A cross-sectional study on prevalence, clinical management and perceived burden.

OBJECTIVE: Functional somatic symptoms (FSS) may progress into a functional disorder if poorly managed, which may have serious implications. This cross-sectional study describes the management of youths compared to adults in general practice and estimates the prevalence of FSS in youths in this setting by comparing consultation-related aspects between youths with FSS and 1) youths with a specific diagnosis and 2) adults with FSS. METHODS: We used data from a Danish survey (2008-2009), including 3295 face-to-face consultations between GPs and patients aged 15-64 years. Patients were divided into youths (15-24 years) and adults (25-64 years) and then into subgroups according to the GPs' classifications: 1) specific diagnosis, 2) resolving symptom and 3) FSS. Logistic regression analysis was used for all comparisons, and estimates were adjusted for gender, concomitant chronic disorder and GP cluster. RESULTS: The GPs more frequently ensured continuity of care in adults (AOR:0.75, 95%CI:0.61-0.92, p < 0.01) and perceived youths as less time consuming (AOR:0.58, 95%CI: 0.43-0.77, p < 0.01) and less burdensome (AOR:0.60; 95%CI: 0.45-0.81, p < 0.01) compared to adults. FSS prevalence was 4.4% in youths and 9.0% in adults. However, GPs perceived youths with FSS as more burdensome (AOR:7.77, 95%CI:2.93-20.04, p < 0.01) and more time consuming (AOR:3.98, 95%CI:1.42-11.12, p < 0.01) than youths with a specific diagnosis. No significant differences were found between youths and adults with FSS, respectively, in regards to perceived burden and consultation time. CONCLUSION: The results indicate age-related variations in the prevalence and clinical management of FSS in general practice. The GPs perceived both youths and adults with FSS time consuming, which underlines a need for supportive management strategies.

Self-help interventions for young people with persistent physical symptoms: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Persistent physical symptoms are frequent among young people causing considerable social, psychological, and economic consequences. Easily accessible interventions adapted to non-specialized settings are needed. We aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials on self-help interventions for young people with persistent physical symptoms compared to active or passive control groups. Our purpose was to 1) describe applied therapeutic approaches and content and 2) examine potential effects on symptom burden and psychosocial outcomes. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials on minimal contact self-help interventions for young people with persistent physical symptoms. Systematic literature searches in PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, and PsycINFO were conducted. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. A narrative synthesis of the effects was performed. RESULTS: We identified 11 studies on self-help interventions for young people. The methodological quality of the studies was generally low. Participants suffered from impairing fatigue, headache, abdominal pain, and musculoskeletal or multi-site pain. Applied therapeutic approaches were cognitive behavioral therapy, relaxation training, hypnotherapy, and written self-disclosure. Outcomes were diverse and mainly related to symptom burden, whereas psychosocial outcomes were only sporadically examined. Overall, evidence of effectiveness of self-help interventions in alleviating symptom burden was weak, and potential effects could not be linked to one specific theoretical approach. CONCLUSION: Few self-help interventions of diverse content exist for young people with persistent physical symptoms. Rigorously designed studies that include recommended outcome domains assessed by aligned measures are needed to determine and compare the clinical value of such interventions.

Improving the Classification of Medically Unexplained Symptoms in Primary Care

No disponible

Many patients in primary care complain of physical symptoms not attributable to any known conventionally defined disease, i.e. medically unexplained symptoms (MUS).Objectives: This paper aims to present the problems with our current classification of MUS in general practice and propose new criteria for the classification of Medically Unexplained Symptoms in a future edition of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC).Methods: Discussion of European classification systems in relation to current evidence about MUS in primary care. Results: At present, clinical care and research are hampered by the lack of a valid and reliable diagnostic classification of MUS. A particular problem in primary care is that the diagnostic category of somatoform disorders only includes persistent cases and therefore offers no opportunity for the classification of many patients with MUS in general practice. We propose new diagnostic criteria for MUS that can easily be integrated in a future edition of the ICPC. The criteria introduce mild to moderate MUS into the chapter of general and unspecified health problems if the patient has at least three MUS during an episode of care, whereas severe conditions are kept in the psychological chapter under the diagnoses applied until now. Conclusion: A diagnosis and classification of MUS is essential for the prediction of prognosis and the choice of appropriate care for these patients in general practice. It remains to be evaluated in epidemiologic research whether the proposed classification criteriafulfil this purpose (AU)