Cognitive-behavioral therapy of insomnia: a clinical case series study of patients with co-morbid disorders and using hypnotic medications.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi) has demonstrated considerable efficacy within randomized clinical trials and case-series designs. This case-series study in a community sleep medicine clinic assessed the effectiveness of an eight-session CBTi protocol chronic insomnia patients who were allowed to continue their use of hypnotics (intent-to-treat n = 48), administered by a clinical psychology doctoral student receiving training and supervision in CBTi by a behavioral sleep medicine certified clinician. Outcome measures included daily sleep diaries, self-report measures on insomnia severity, dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep, daytime sleepiness, as well as medication usage. Patients showed significant improvements in sleep onset latency, wake time after sleep onset, sleep efficiency, insomnia severity, and dysfunctional sleep beliefs from pre- to post-treatment. No changes were seen in daytime sleepiness - patients were not excessively sleepy either before or after treatment. Use of sleep medication declined significantly from 87.5% pre-treatment to 54% post-treatment, despite no active efforts to encourage patients to withdraw. Results demonstrate that a CBTi conducted in a community sleep medicine clinic with patients not required to discontinue sleep-related medications can have similar effects as therapy delivered among those not on medication.

The Time of Day Sleepiness Scale to assess differential levels of sleepiness across the day.

OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the Time of Day Sleepiness Scale (ToDSS) to determine subjective estimates of sleepiness in the morning, afternoon, and evening. Scores on the ToDSS were compared to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The ToDSS was evaluated on three cohorts of patients at a sleep medicine clinic. METHOD: The items of the ToDSS are modified from the ESS to enable subjective assessment in the morning (before noon), afternoon (noon to 1800 h), and evening (after 1800 h). The scale takes about 5 min to complete. For each item, patients provide an estimate of their level of sleepiness in three separate columns, each indicating the time of day (morning, afternoon, and evening). RESULTS: Each ToDSS score evidenced a one factor structure. The ToDSS enabled the assessment of differential levels of sleepiness across the day among several cohorts, with scores increasing in the afternoon and evening. The ESS and each score of the ToDSS demonstrated high correlations. Lower subjective estimates of sleepiness were documented after treatment with continuous positive airway pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The ToDSS was shown to have comparable psychometric features to the ESS and provided perceived sleepiness levels across the day in an efficient and cost-effective manner. It also enabled characterization of treatment response among a cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Long-term follow-up of patients with insomnia.

It has been suggested that patients with insomnia who are lost to follow-up continue to experience symptoms. From winter 2006 to spring 2007, we contacted consecutive patients initially seen at a multidisciplinary sleep medicine clinic 3 to 5 years earlier and asked them about continuing symptoms. Among the 58 patients who agreed to participate, 43 (74%) reported that they still experienced difficulty initiating and/or maintaining sleep. Thirty-one of those patients had continued to receive treatment, 11 from a sleep medicine specialist and the remainder from other physicians. The majority listed zolpidem or eszopiclone as their primary medication, and many took multiple medications, including over-the-counter drugs and alternative medications. Most patients with insomnia were unaware of cognitive-behavioral therapy. These findings emphasize the need for primary care physicians to monitor symptoms of insomnia and to remain vigilant about potential treatment complications.

The Epworth sleepiness scale in the identification of obstructive sleep apnea.

The Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) is often used clinically to screen for the manifestations of the behavioral morbidity associated to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity of the ESS in the identification of OSA, as defined by an elevated apnea-hypopnea index. A retrospective chart review of 268 consecutive patients diagnosed with OSA at a multidisciplinary sleep medicine clinic was conducted. The ESS obtained a relatively low sensitivity (66%) in the identification of an apnea-hypopnea index of 5 and above at the suggested cutoff of 10 and increased to 76% at 8. The results of the study showed only fair discriminatory ability of the ESS as a screener for OSA. A score of 8 (instead of 10) is suggested as the cutoff among clinic populations being screened for a sleep disorder.

Psychological status and levels of sleepiness-alertness among patients with insomnia.

Are symptoms of daytime sleepiness relevant among patients with insomnia? Patients with insomnia frequently report daytime consequences secondary to their difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of daytime sleepiness as defined by a self-reported measure of daytime sleepiness (the Epworth Sleepiness Scale). In addition, the study characterized the patients' psychological status using the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. The study corroborated a relatively high frequency of excessive daytime sleepiness and psychiatric conditions among patients with insomnia. Furthermore, the results of the study suggest variation in psychological distress levels, according to the different levels of sleepiness/alertness.