Outcomes from the use of computerized neurocognitive testing in a recurrent glioblastoma clinical trial.

Assessment of neurocognitive function (NCF) is important in brain tumor clinical trials, however there are varying methodologies available. We used the Cogstate computerized NCF testing battery and the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) to prospectively assess cognition in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) enrolled in the CABARET randomized phase II clinical trial of bevacizumab versus bevacizumab plus carboplatin chemotherapy. We determined completion rates; compared NCF results between trial arms; and assessed baseline NCF as a predictor of survival outcome. 93 of 103 eligible patients completed baseline Cogstate NCF testing. Completion rates were between 60 and 100% across each timepoint, and 38% at disease progression. There was no evidence of difference between arms in time to deterioration in NCF using either test. Prior to disease progression, deterioration on the Cogstate tests was substantially more common (90%) than deterioration on the MMSE (37%), and decline in the Cogstate composite score within the first 8 weeks was associated with shorter overall survival. This testing methodology may be useful when determining net clinical benefit for therapies in patients with recurrent GBM.

Neuro-Oncology and Radiogenomics: Time to Integrate?

Radiogenomics aims to predict genetic markers based on imaging features. The critical importance of molecular markers in the diagnosis and management of intracranial gliomas has led to a rapid growth in radiogenomics research, with progressively increasing complexity. Despite the advances in the techniques being examined, there has been little translation into the clinical domain. This has resulted in a growing disconnect between cutting-edge research and assimilation into clinical practice, though the fundamental goal is for these techniques to improve patient care. The goal of this review, therefore, is to discuss possible clinical scenarios in which the addition of radiogenomics may aid patient management. This includes facilitating patient counseling, determining optimal patient management when complete molecular characterization is not possible, reclassifying tumors, and overcoming some of the limitations of histologic assessment. The review also discusses considerations for selecting relevant radiogenomic features based on the clinical setting.

Evolving management of low grade glioma: No consensus amongst treating clinicians.

Following the widely publicized presentation of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9802 data, we sought to understand how these data had been translated to the management of low grade gliomas (LGG) by Australian neuro-oncology clinicians. The de novo management of LGG is transitioning to include postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy after the RTOG 9802 study results demonstrated a survival benefit in this setting. In 2014, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists and neuro-oncologists who were members of the Australian Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-oncology (COGNO), as well as additional attendants of the COGNO annual scientific meeting, were surveyed. The survey presented six LGG clinical scenarios and asked respondents to select their preferred management strategy. Some additional questions included the respondents' approach to 1p/19q testing and chemotherapy preferences. The response rate was 30.2% (61/202), with the majority (77%) working in tertiary referral neuro-oncology centers. There was no consensus regarding the management approach for each scenario, with postsurgery observation alone remaining a popular strategy. Only 25% of respondents reported that their institution routinely tests for 1p/19q status in LGG, although 69% were of the opinion that all LGG patients should be tested. The majority (81%) preferred to use temozolomide rather than the procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine combination as the first line chemotherapy for LGG, but only 44% would actually use it in this setting. Up front chemotherapy, prior to radiotherapy, would be considered by 52% of respondents for certain LGG patients. This survey assessed the management strategies for LGG since the updated RTOG 9802 data were presented. It demonstrates no consensus in the postoperative treatment approaches for LGG.

Inpatient palliative care consultation for patients with glioblastoma in a tertiary hospital.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an uncommon disease with significant mortality and morbidity, but there is a lack of published evidence on palliative care involvement with this population. This audit highlights the heavy symptom burden, extensive allied health involvement and discharge outcomes of GBM inpatients referred to the palliative care service at The Royal Melbourne Hospital. This information can provide an important framework for further research and also supports the role of multidisciplinary palliative care in the care of patients with GBM.

Local perspective on a rare brain tumour: adult medulloblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Little contemporary data are available regarding Australian patterns of care in adult medulloblastoma. It is unclear whether treatment, extrapolated from paediatric protocols despite known differences between the two groups, results in comparable efficacy. AIM: To perform a retrospective review of patterns of care in adult medulloblastoma, especially with respect to adjuvant chemotherapy, in Australian patients. METHODS: All medulloblastoma patients aged 15 years or older at two neuro-oncology institutions were identified from January 1995-May 2011. Patients with supratentorial or peripheral tumours were excluded. Standardised data were extracted from each institution regarding symptoms, disease staging, treatments received, toxicities and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen eligible patients were identified. Median age was 37 years (range 20-67 years). All had good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1). There were 11 standard-risk de novo patients, three high-risk de novo patients and three patients with recurrent disease. Median overall survival (OS) had not been reached for standard-risk patients with median follow up of 58 months. The median OS for high-risk de novo patients was 21 months, while the median OS was 15 months for patients with recurrent disease. Treatment was well tolerated, with haematological toxicities being most common. CONCLUSIONS: Combined modality therapy (surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy) was well tolerated and associated with good outcomes in standard-risk de novo patients. High-risk and recurrent disease patients do extremely poorly regardless of treatment and better treatment strategies are needed in these patients.

Imaging modalities in high-grade gliomas: pseudoprogression, recurrence, or necrosis?

High grade gliomas (HGG) frequently recur regardless of treatment. Radiological detection of progressive disease (PD) is challenging due to the possibility of therapy-related MRI changes including: pseudoprogression (PP) and radiation necrosis (RN). Both may mimic PD. We undertook a literature review to examine existing data regarding imaging modalities and their ability to distinguish between PP, RN and PD. The review revealed 26 articles comparing the value of imaging modalities used to differentiate PP, RN and PD. Overall, conventional MRI and (18)fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) were more sensitive, while thallium single photon emission CT (SPECT) was more specific in differentiating PD from PP and RN. However, further prospective studies comparing the clinical utility of MRI, PET, and SPECT are needed to establish the most reliable diagnostic tool for the differentiation of PP, RN and PD in HGG.

Open-label, phase I dose-escalation study of sodium selenate, a novel activator of PP2A, in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis is fundamental to the progression of many solid tumours including prostate cancer. Sodium selenate is a small, water-soluble, orally bioavailable activator of PP2A phosphatase with anti-angiogenic properties. METHODS: This was a dose-escalation phase I study in men with asymptomatic, chemotherapy-naïve, castration-resistant prostate cancer. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included establishing the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were enrolled. The MTD was 60 mg per day. Dose-limiting toxicity (fatigue and diarrhoea) was observed at 90 mg per day. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events across all treatment cohorts were nausea, diarrhoea, fatigue, muscle spasms, alopecia and nail disorders. No grade 4 toxicities were observed and there were no deaths on study. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed. One patient had a PSA response >50%. Median time to PSA progression (for non-responders) was 14.2 weeks. Mean PSA doubling time increased during the main treatment phase from 2.18 months before trial to 3.85 months. CONCLUSION: Sodium selenate is well tolerated at a dose of 60 mg per day with modest single-agent efficacy similar to other anti-angiogenic agents. Further trials in combination with conventional cytotoxic regimens are warranted.

Communication in and clinician satisfaction with multidisciplinary team meetings in neuro-oncology.

Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) meetings are critical in the management of complex cancer cases. There are limited data regarding the effectiveness of neuro-oncology MDT meetings and the impact of documenting and disseminating the recommended patient management. We established a weekly neuro-oncology MDT meeting and developed a standard electronic communication process. A survey was issued to participating clinicians to assess their level of satisfaction. The survey revealed that 100% felt the meeting and its documentation was very or extremely important, and 94% (n=15) felt the meeting was effective in documentation and communication of plans. There was a mixed response regarding which patients should be discussed: 44% (n=7) thought all patients should be discussed and 56% (n=9) thought only those patients with complex management issues should be discussed. We have developed an efficient method of documenting and disseminating patient information arising from our neuro-oncology MDT meeting. Clinician satisfaction was high.

Survival comparison between glioblastoma multiforme and other incurable cancers.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an incurable disease that has a reputation as having one of the worst prognoses of all cancers. Recent advances in treatment have led to significant improvements in both progression-free and overall survival. Despite this, the wider medical community continues to perceive GBM as having an incomparably poor prognosis. This perception may stem from a lack of awareness regarding the significant survival advantage through the addition of concurrent and post-radiotherapy temozolomide, as well as unfair comparisons to cancers with curable early stages. In this analysis, we compared the efficacy data reported in pivotal studies for the incurable stage of common cancers to modern efficacy data for GBM. In particular, we compared median overall survival, median progression-free survival and 12-month and 5-year survival rates. Our results demonstrate that with modern treatment, GBM survival is now comparable to, if not better than, many other incurable cancers.

Randomised phase II study of ASA404 combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

ASA404 (5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid or DMXAA) is a small-molecule tumour-vascular disrupting agent (Tumour-VDA). This randomised phase II study evaluated ASA404 plus standard therapy of carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIb or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not previously treated with chemotherapy. Patients were randomised to receive

Safety and pharmacokinetics of motesanib in combination with gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with solid tumours.

The aim of this open-label phase 1b study was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of motesanib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumours. Eligible patients with histologically or cytologically documented solid tumours or lymphoma were enroled in three sequential, dose-escalating cohorts to receive motesanib 50 mg once daily (QD), 75 mg two times daily (BID), or 125 mg QD in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2)). The primary end point was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Twenty-six patients were enroled and received motesanib and gemcitabine. No DLTs occurred. The 75 mg BID cohort was discontinued early; therefore, 125 mg QD was the maximum target dose. Sixteen patients (62%) experienced motesanib-related adverse events, most commonly lethargy (n=6), diarrhoea (n=4), fatigue (n=3), headache (n=3), and nausea (n=3). The pharmacokinetics of motesanib and of gemcitabine were not markedly affected after combination therapy. The objective response rate was 4% (1 of 26), and 27% (7 of 26) of patients achieved stable disease. In conclusion, treatment with motesanib plus gemcitabine was well tolerated, with adverse event and pharmacokinetic profiles similar to that observed in monotherapy studies.

Diagnosing cancer: changing patterns of care.

We prospectively assessed 100 consecutive inpatient referrals made to the Medical Oncology Unit. The major end-point was the time to diagnostic biopsy. Referral trends and treatment outcomes were also recorded. Our results show that the referring units undertook the diagnostic process in the vast majority and the time to inpatient diagnostic biopsy has fallen from 10 to 4.6 days, compared with a similar study 13 years ago. This emphasizes the changing role of the oncologist in current day multidisciplinary cancer care.

Phase II study of vinflunine in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: An open-label, multicentre, non-comparative phase II trial to determine the response rate of intravenous vinflunine as first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC were treated with vinflunine 350 mg/m2 (n = 11) or 320 mg/m2 (n = 22) administered intravenously every 21 days. RESULTS: Out of 33 patients included in this study, one partial response was observed in the group treated at 350 mg/m2 and none in the group receiving 320 mg/m2 resulting in a response rate in this population of 9.1% (95% CI: 0.2-41.3). Median progression free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI: 2.8-14.4) for patients treated at 350 mg/m2, and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.6-6.4) for those treated at 320 mg/m2.The median survival time was 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.8-12.4) for the whole study population. The principal toxicities were grade 3/4 neutropaenia -90.9% at 350 mg/m2 and 68.1% at 320 mg/m2, febrile neutropaenia was recorded in 3 patients (27.3%) at 350 mg/m2 and in 5 patients (22.7%) at 320 mg/m2. One episode of thromboembolic event was reported in 1 patient at each dose level. CONCLUSION: Vinflunine given intravenously once every 3 weeks has not shown any clinically relevant activity in the management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma; tolerance of the treatment was better at a dose of 320 mg/m2 than at 350 mg/m2.

Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.

AIMS: To develop a human research ethics committee (HREC) mutual acceptance (MA) model, based on the National Health and Medical Research Council's guidelines. The MA model aims to facilitate aspects of multicentre research and decrease the time taken to finalise the HREC review process. METHODS: Four HREC (The Alfred Hospital, Austin Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Melbourne Health) agreed to participate in a 13-month pilot project to evaluate the MA model. Evaluation included times from submission to approval and stakeholder surveys. RESULTS: Seventeen consecutive studies were submitted to the MA pilot project. Stakeholders agreed that the MA model was efficient and effective and that submission and review processes had improved, with a demonstrable reduction in the levels of duplication. There was a 27% improvement in approval times for multicentre studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our (MA) model resulted in clear improvements in HREC processes and timelines. Stakeholder acceptance was high. This model provides a framework for a broader program of MA.