Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12324798

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the visual image quality of film-based and digitized panoramic radiographs through use of a hole-containing test wedge. STUDY DESIGN: An aluminum wedge containing 100 cells, of which 90 were given shallow holes, was exposed in the film-based Orthophos CD panoramic unit. Two radiographs subjectively exhibiting optimum contrast were selected. Films were digitized with a charge-coupled device flatbed scanner at 300 dpi. Films and digitized images were rated cellwise by 2 similar groups of 50 observers each with respect to spot perception. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity was 0.26 +/- 0.09 for film and 0.20 +/- 0.07 for digitized images (P =.000), with a pronounced decline in the latter in regions of high background density. The average specificity was 0.93 +/- 0.07 for film versus 0.92 +/- 0.08 for digitized images (P = 0.213). CONCLUSION: Film yielded a significantly higher sensitivity, but this absolute difference was actually small compared with that of the digitized images.


Assuntos
Radiografia Dentária Digital , Radiografia Panorâmica , Absorciometria de Fóton , Conversão Análogo-Digital , Meios de Contraste , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Imagens de Fantasmas , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Filme para Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...