Revising psychiatric diagnostic categorisation of immigrant patients after using the Cultural Formulation in DSM-IV.

This study evaluated the use of the Outline for Cultural Formulation (OCF) from the DSM-IV in the diagnosis of immigrants and refugee patients at an outpatient psychiatric clinic in Sweden. Using the OCF in conjunction with standard diagnostic procedures led to major revisions of diagnoses for 56.5% of patients. Anxiety disorders, especially PTSD, constitute the disorder group in which the most changes were made. In order to understand how information from the OCF interview led clinicians to revise diagnoses, data from clinical discussions were analysed through qualitative content analysis. This revealed four major themes related to the reevaluation, and at times confirmation, of given clinical psychiatric diagnoses: new information; expression of distress in emotional language; expression of distress in relation to life experiences; and improved understanding of the patient's suffering. The findings suggest that the OCF may be useful for: (a) formulating culture in relation to illness experiences, (b) contextualising diagnostic categorisation, and (c) improving overall understanding of the patient that may facilitate individualised planning of treatment and therapy.

Barriers in the help-seeking process: a multiple-case study of early-onset dysthymia in Sweden.

The aim of this study was to investigate barriers to diagnosis and adequate treatment of patients with early-onset dysthymia by studying how understandings of illness by patients and providers have evolved and how treatments have been negotiated over time. A theory-testing and explorative multiple-case study design was used with developmental cognitive theory as framework. Data pertaining 10 non-remission dysthymic patients were analyzed using five sources: 1) case records, 2) interviews, 3) self-report questionnaires, 4) observations, and 5) life-charting, eliciting life events, course and treatments. The analysis comprised qualitative content analysis and a coding scheme of knowledge structures. Barriers could be explained by misunderstandings as patients mainly expressed illness in concrete, perceptually bound knowledge structures and providers focused on one aspect, instead of on the complexity of concurrent aspects. Another barrier, associated to comorbid personality disorder, was a core pattern of concealing due to fear of rejection and mistrust. Other barriers were connected to providers' attitudes and contextual factors such as access problems and lack of follow-up. A theoretical model that involves patients' understanding of illness in preoperational thinking and providers' cognitive errors can explain communication barriers. Means of shared understanding and treatment planning are suggested. Future treatment research could elucidate the impact of the core belief of rejection with associated strategy of concealing by assessing these variables as predictors and as targets for change.