Factors Predictive of Mortality among Geriatric Patients Sustaining Low-Energy Blunt Trauma.

Background: In geriatric trauma patients, higher mortality rate is observed compared to younger patients. A significant portion of trauma sustained by this age group comes from low-energy mechanisms (fall from standing or sitting). We sought to investigate the outcome of these patients and identify factors associated with mortality. Methods: A retrospective review of 1285 geriatric trauma patients who came to our level 1 trauma center for trauma activation (hospital alert to mobilize surgical trauma service, emergency department trauma team, nursing, and ancillary staff for highest level of critical care) after sustaining low-energy blunt trauma over a 1-year period. IRB approval was obtained, data collected included demographics, vital signs, laboratory data, injuries sustained, length of stay and outcomes. Patients were divided into three age categories: 65−74, 75−84 and >85. Comorbidities collected included a history of chronic renal failure, COPD, Hypertension and Myocardial Infarction. Results: 1285 geriatric patients (age > 65 years) presented to our level 1 trauma center for trauma activation with a low-energy blunt trauma during the study period; 34.8% of the patients were men, 20.5% had at least one comorbidity, and 89.6% were white. Median LOS was 5 days; 37 (2.9%) patients died. Age of 85 and over (OR 3.44 with 95% CI 1.01−11.7 and 2.85 with 95% CI 1.0−6.76, when compared to 65−74 and 75−84, respectively), injury severity score (ISS) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.15) and the presence of more than one comorbidity (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.68) were independently predictive of death on multi-variable logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: Age more than 85 years, higher injury severity score and the presence of more than one comorbidity are independent predictors of mortality among geriatric patients presenting with low-energy blunt trauma.

Endovascular Management of Bleeding Aortoenteric Fistula May be Feasible as a Definitive Repair.

Aorto-enteric fistula (AEF) is a complication with devastating sequelae and significant morbidity. Although open surgery remains primary treatment endovascular approach may be used as a temporary bridge but rarely as a definitive therapy. We present a case of a patient who presented with a secondary AEF, due to hemodynamic instability we chose to treat the fistula with an aortic endograft. The patient underwent bowel resection due to bowel obstruction with omental patch over the aortic rent, 6 weeks of antibiotics. Patient is now at 8-year follow-up without evidence of infection. Although there is scarce literature on this topic, endovascular treatment of bleeding AEF may be feasible as a definitive option. Due to high risk of graft infection we recommend close observation and suppressive antibiotics.