[Comparison of early management of central retinal vein occlusion with ranibizumab versus hemodilution]. / Comparaison de la prise en charge précoce des occlusions de la veine centrale de la rétine par ranibizumab et/ou hémodilution.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of early treatment of CRVO with either hemodilution by erythrocytopheresis or intravitreal (IVT) ranibizumab, or both. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentric prospective randomized study including patients with CRVO for less than 1 month was designed. Patients were randomized into 3 treatment groups: hemodilution (HD group), 3 monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab followed by PRN treatment (IVT group), or combined treatment (IVT+HD group). A monthly evaluation during a 6-month follow-up included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular thickness measurements with OCT. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline, month 2 and month 6. Local and systemic tolerability of the different treatments were also compared. RESULTS: Forty-four CRVO patients were included between February 2010 and June 2013: 20 in the IVT group, 13 in the HD group and 11 in the HD+IVT group. The mean duration of CRVO at baseline was 10 days and 16 days at the time of treatment without any significant difference between groups. Retinal ischemia was present at baseline in 40% of eyes in each group. After a 6-month follow-up, no difference between the 3 groups was observed in BCVA (10.5 ETDRS letters, 14.6 and 14.1 in the IVT group, HD group and IVT+HD group respectively, P=0.726) or in macular thickness (398 µ, 440 µ and 379 µ respectively, P=0.465). The time until treatment from CRVO onset, ranging from 1 to 35 days, was not correlated to final outcomes. No significant difference in the mean number of IVT (3.2 in the IVT+HD group vs 3.7 in the IVT group) was observed at 6 months. CONCLUSION: No difference in BCVA nor in macular thickness was seen at M6 between the study groups. The duration of CRVO at the time of the initiation of the treatment was not correlated to better visual outcomes. Therefore, etiologic treatment with HD can still be proposed as a first-line treatment in young patients, which allows delaying or avoiding the IVT treatment and its potential side effects. Anti-VEGF IVT still remains an effective option in every case and can be started one month after the beginning of the CRVO.

[Anti-VEGF therapy in the treatment of anterior segment neovascularization secondary to central retinal vein occlusion]. / Apport des anti-VEGF dans le traitement de la néovascularisation du segment antérieur compliquant les occlusions veineuses rétiniennes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the benefit of anti-VEGF in the treatment of anterior segment neovascularization (ASNV), a severe complication of ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients with ASNV secondary to CRVO treated with anti-VEGF. Ophthalmic parameters were recorded for each visit: measurement of best visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), iris examination, gonioscopy and fundus examination, and as necessary, fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (19 eyes) received intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF in association with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). In patients who had uncomplicated rubeosis iridis without elevated IOP (n=6), after a mean of 3 injections, VA was stable in 4 patients and improved by two lines in 2 patients. In patients with early neovascular glaucoma (NVG) (n=13), IOP reduction was observed in all eyes within 1 week after injection but increased secondarily after an average of 45 days, although the rubeosis had definitively disappeared, which suggested that the change in IOP was independent of ASNV. After a mean of 6 injections in combination with filtering or cyclodestructive surgery, IOP finally stabilized, but VA decreased in all patients. Three patients (50%) with stage III ASNV progressed to stage IV ASNV in spite of anti-VEGF treatment. CONCLUSION: In all eyes, anti-VEGF treatment stopped neovascularization and helped to control IOP. However, vision was preserved only in the eyes with uncomplicated rubeosis at the time of diagnosis. Since only 32% of eyes were diagnosed at this stage, the authors suggest the prevention of ASNV by careful screening and follow-up of patients at risk, and the performance of PRP in CRVO with extensive retinal non-perfusion prior to the onset of rubeosis.

Choroidal neovascularization associated with extensive macular atrophy with pseudodrusen-like appearance.

PURPOSE: Extensive macular atrophy with pseudodrusen-like appearance (EMAP) is a recently described entity. We describe the first observations of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) associated with EMAP in 3 patients. METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients with EMAP were retrospectively investigated for the presence of CNV and treatment outcomes. Each patient underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination including color fundus photograpy, fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography (ICG) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). RESULTS: Retrospective analysis revealed choroidal neovascularization in 3 patients (4 eyes) out of 19 patients with EMAP. In these patients, laser photocoagulation or intravitreal injections of ranibizumab led to resolution of retinal exudation with limited functional improvement. CONCLUSION: CNV is a possible complication of EMAP, a recently reported form of macular atrophy resembling geographic atrophy. Laser photocoagulation and anti-VEGF treatment appear to be two valuable therapeutic options.