Examining self-perceived first-aid abilities after the Northridge earthquake.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines those factors predictive of self-perceived first-aid abilities among a community-based sample after the 1994 Northridge earthquake. METHODS: A probabilities-proportionate-to-size (pps) sample of residents of Los Angeles Country and 11 pre-selected zip codes from southeastern Ventura County was selected using computer-generated random digit-dialing (rdd) procedures 7-11 months after the earthquake. Data were collected from 506 individuals in 45 minute interviews. A unidimensional scale of self-perceived first-aid ability was created and represents the dependent variable in a causal path model. RESULTS: In a causal path model, standardized path coefficients suggested that while reports of taking first-aid courses were the most influential factors in predicting higher self-perceived first-aid abilities, other factors including being white, younger, speaking English in the home, and lower income also predicted higher self-perceived first-aid abilities that were independent from taking formal first-aid courses. CONCLUSIONS: First-aid training should be directed towards target segments of the population that are not likely to have had instruction in these basic skills. Those individuals who self-report high first-aid proficiency, independent of formal first-aid training, should be evaluated to assess their abilities to perform these skills.

On-line medical control versus protocol-based prehospital care.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare on-scene time, appropriateness of therapy, and accuracy of paramedic clinical assessments when prehospital care was provided with the use of on-line medical control (OLMC) by EMS-certified nurses from a single base station or by paramedics using chief complaint-based protocols. METHODS: We assembled a prospective before-and-after series to compare OLMC (phase 1) and protocol (phase 2) care rendered by all paramedics in a single urban municipality using a single base station. The subjects were consecutively enrolled patients who met protocol inclusion criteria and presented with altered level of consciousness, nontraumatic chest pain, or shortness of breath. For both phases, EMS and corresponding ED records were compiled; all references identifying phase were removed. After establishing interrater reliability, we randomly assigned charts to one of two reviewers for scoring. Complaint-specific scoring elements included on-scene time, assessments performed, presence or absence of indications for common treatments, treatments given, paramedic diagnosis, and emergency physician diagnosis. The percentages of inappropriate treatment decisions and paramedic diagnostic accuracy (versus that of the receiving emergency physician) were calculated. RESULTS: Phase 1 comprised 287 patients, phase 2 294. Interrater reliability between the two scorers was high. Of 2,190 elements scored jointly, the raters agreed in 97%, with kappa-values ranging from .6 to 1.0. On-scene time was 1 minute shorter during phase 2 (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference in median time, 0 to 2 minutes; P < .03). From phase 1 to phase 2 (relative risk [RR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.1), inappropriate treatment decisions decreased from 7.4% to 5.1%. The percentage of cases in which paramedics and physicians were in complete diagnostic agreement was high (77% to 78%) and did not change across phases. CONCLUSION: The use of protocols resulted in small improvements in both on-scene time and the appropriateness of therapeutic decisions, without a change in agreement between paramedic and physician. Protocol care for these three chief complaints is clinically safe and, by reducing training and staffing considerations, may offer a cost-effective alternative to OLMC.

Comparison of inhaled metaproterenol via metered-dose and hand-held nebulization in prehospital treatment of bronchospasm.

INTRODUCTION: Although the efficacy of the administration of beta-adrenergic bronchodilators has been demonstrated, the best method available for the delivery of these drugs in the prehospital setting has not been defined. This paper compares the effects of administration of metaproterenol when administered by paramedics using either a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) or a hand-held nebulizer (HHN). HYPOTHESIS: There is no difference in the effects produced in patients suffering from smooth bronchiolar muscle spasm by metaproterenol when delivered either by a standard metered-dose inhaler or with a hand-held nebulizer. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive prehospital patients complaining of difficulty breathing with clinical evidence of bronchospasm and with a history of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or emphysema who were not in extremis. METHODS: Prior to the administration of metaproterenol, a peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was obtained. This measurement was repeated five minutes following the conclusion of the administration of metaproterenol. Patients in Burbank, California, received the treatment using a standard metered-dose inhaler, and those in Madison, Wisconsin, received the drug using a hand-held nebulizer. Peak expiratory flow rates were compared using Student's t-tests with Bonferroni's correction. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Data were collected from 36 consecutive patients by the paramedics of the Burbank Fire Department and from 32 consecutive patients by the paramedics of the Madison Fire Department. For the metered-dose inhaler group, the mean value for peak expiratory flow rate for the pre-treatment test was 95.4 +/- 88.1 l/min, and after treatment was 109.4 +/- 89.3 l/min (p < 0.001). For the hand-held nebulizer group, the mean value for peak expiratory flow rate before the administration of the metaproterenol was 96.1 +/- 76.3 l/min and following the treatment was 149.1 +/- 92.9 l/min (p < 0.001). The mean values for the differences between the control peak expiratory flow rate and the post-treatment peak expiratory flow rate for the metered-dose inhaler group was + 140.0 +/- 27.4 l/min, and for the hand-held nebulizer group was + 53.0 +/- 69.1 l/min (p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In the prehospital setting, the administration of metaproterenol using a hand-held nebulizer is more effective than delivering the drug using a metered-dose inhaler. The hand-held nebulizer is easier to use and delivers a higher dose of the drug than is convenient using the metered-dose inhaler.

Low-level carbon-monoxide poisoning: inability of neuropsychological testing to identify patients who benefit from hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Although major sequelae of carbon-monoxide (CO) poisoning and its treatment with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) are well-documented, a syndrome of low-level CO poisoning has received relatively little attention. Subtle symptoms of poor concentration, language difficulty, problems with calculations, and memory loss were noted after an acute exposure of 131 dormitory residents to low levels of CO. The CO Neuropsychological Screening Battery (CONSB), a series of tests reported by others as useful to identify victims of CO poisoning, was performed on a subset of 46 victims. It was hypothesized that their test scores would improve after treatment with HBO. METHODS: Testing was performed both before and after HBO on 35 CO-exposed victims. A control group of 20 students residing on the same college campus, but not involved with the CO incident, also were tested on two separate occasions to assess the ability of the test to identify selectively victims of low-level CO poisoning, as well as to evaluate its validity when administered serially. RESULTS: Both CO-exposed and control subjects demonstrated significant performance improvement when completing the testing for the second time. In addition, the baseline test scores were not significantly different for either the CO-exposed or the control groups. Nonetheless, all CO-exposed victims reported immediate subjective improvement of their symptoms after HBO therapy. CONCLUSION: These observations and a review of the literature suggest that there might exist a syndrome of subtle neurological disturbances in victims of low-level CO poisoning. Whether this is permanent or might regress spontaneously over time is unknown. As a diagnostic adjunct, the CONSB does not appear to be as useful in low-level CO poisoning.

Rapid volume infusion in prehospital care.

The ability to deliver large volumes of intravenous (IV) fluids may be critical to the successful prehospital resuscitation of hypovolemic patients. We compared the time required to deliver one liter of crystalloid solution, using an administration set-up consisting of a 16-gauge (g), 1.25 inch, intravenous cannula, a pneumatic pressure bag, and either conventional intravenous tubing (3.2 mm internal diameter [ID]) or large bore (4.4 mm internal diameter [ID]) "shock" tubing. With the fluid bag positioned at 110cm (46 inches) above the level of the cannula, the mean elapsed time to deliver 1,000ml using the conventional tubing set-up was 6.0 minutes, while the same volume could be delivered in only 2.7 minutes with the shock tubing configuration. This time was reduced to 1.8 minutes when the intravenous cannula size was increased to 14g. By attaching a liter of fluid to each arm of the "Y" adapter of the shock tubing, virtually uninterrupted fluid flow may be maintained at this rate. We feel this intravenous configuration could enhance greatly the ability of paramedics to provide fluid resuscitation in the field setting. When such IVs are established en route to a receiving hospital, this technique may prove to be an important adjunct to improving patient outcome from hypovolemic shock.

Prehospital use of heparin locks: a cost-effective method for intravenous access.

Intravenous (IV) infusions were ordered in nearly 95% of paramedic runs called into a busy base station hospital. Most of the patients received IV lines for either prophylactic access or administration of single or multiple bolus medications. In this group of patients, the application of a heparin lock injection port directly to the IV catheter, followed by the injection of 10 units of heparin, was evaluated. Of 102 consecutive patients treated in the field, 98 (97%) were treated with heparin locks only. The total number of patients requiring an IV infusion drip (either by paramedics or in the emergency department of the receiving hospital) was 20 (20%). If all 102 patients had received conventional IV drip infusions, the total patient equipment charges would have been $4,610.40. The actual charges for all patients in this series, either with heparin locks or IV infusion sets, was $1,846.14--a 60% savings. The results of the study indicate that the heparin lock is a safe, convenient, and cost-effective method for maintaining IV access in the prehospital environment.

A method for reviewing radio-telemetry paramedic calls.

A method is presented for reviewing the taped radio-telemetry records of paramedic calls managed by hospital-based emergency medicine residents. All paramedic calls to the LAC/USC base station are reviewed by an emergency medicine resident using a special tape review form which focuses on communication skills, initial paramedic field assessment, sense of urgency of the case, and the completeness of the filed report. Additional emphasis is placed on the base station physician's interpretation of the field presentation and his choice of therapy. Tapes demonstrating particular skills or pitfalls in prehospital management are selected for monthly tape review conferences. Such conferences provide a method by which each side of the prehospital care team can perceive the position of the other, encouraging physicians and paramedics to enhance their respective roles in providing effective prehospital emergency care.