Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 91(3): 229-232, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29567127

RESUMO

We compared the performance of algorithmic Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis with four molecular tests in children. Stool samples in patients 1-18 years old were tested with an algorithm (C. Diff Quik Chek Complete (QCC) reflexed to illumigene C. difficile); AmpliVue C. difficile (ACD); Lyra Direct C. difficile (Lyra); BD MAX C diff (BDM); and Xpert C. difficile (XCD). The gold standard was positivity by two tests. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 85%, 99%, 93%, 97% for the algorithm; 21%, 99%, 78%, 87% for QCC's toxin component; 94%, 99%, 94%, 99% for ACD; 88%, 99%, 94%, 98% for Lyra; 94%, 100%, 100%, 99% for BDM, and 94%, 99%, 94% and 99% for XCD. 9.6% of samples were ribotype 027. Algorithms may detect CDI with lower sensitivity compared to molecular methods in children. This may be related to low prevalence of NAP-1/ribotype 027.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Clostridioides difficile/enzimologia , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Glutamato Desidrogenase/análise , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(10): 3370-3, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26269624

RESUMO

This study compared the performance of the Carba NP assay, published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, and the Rosco Rapid Carb Screen kit. Carba NP had superior sensitivity, but both assays required an increased inoculum to detect carbapenemase production in isolates with blaNDM, blaIMP, and blaOXA-48.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzimologia , beta-Lactamases/análise , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Humanos , América do Norte , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 137(8): 1103-5, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23899068

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Timely initiation of directed antimicrobial therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is dependent on rapid identification of S. aureus to ascertain methicillin-susceptibility status. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the performance of the rapid KeyPath (MicroPhage, Inc, Longmont, Colorado) methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) blood culture test (MMBT). DESIGN: Positive BacT/ALERT Pediatric FAN (fastidious antibiotic neutralization) blood culture bottles (bioMérieux, Inc, Durham, North Carolina) were tested prospectively using MMBT and routine bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing procedures as the gold standard. The MMBT uses an S. aureus-specific bacteriophage cocktail that infects bacterial cells and replicates them, resulting in cellular lysis. Bacteriophage-specific antibodies detect the increase in bacteriophage concentration in an immunoassay device. Phage amplification, in both the presence and absence of cefoxitin, indicates the presence of MRSA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MMBT in detecting S. aureus, MSSA, and MRSA were calculated. RESULTS: Of 188 positive blood cultures tested, 199 (63%) had Gram-positive cocci in clusters, 46 (24%) grew S. aureus (26 MSSA [57%], 20 MRSA [43%]) with the MMBT detecting 40 of 46 (87%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value among blood cultures with Gram-positive cocci in clusters were 87%, 100%, 100%, and 92% for S. aureus; 81%, 100%, 100%, and 95% for MSSA; and 95%, 100%, 100%, and 99% for MRSA. All blood cultures without growth of S. aureus tested negative by MMBT. CONCLUSIONS: The MMBT detected MSSA and MRSA directly from positive BacT/ALERT PF bottles with positive predictive values of 100%, suggesting that positive results could be reported immediately, but the sensitivity of this assay limited immediate reporting of negative results.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Humanos , Resistência a Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Fagos de Staphylococcus , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/virologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA