Momentarily stuck in the foramen ovale.

An 80-year-old woman was admitted for a diagnosis of severe pulmonary embolism. A large serpentine thrombus stuck in a patent foramen ovale (PFO) completely resolved without the patient experiencing any manifestation. The right renal artery was the final destination. Thromboaspiration was unsuccessful. Three months later, the patient was diagnosed with a malignant melanoma and metastatic dissemination.

[What is the place of beta-adrenergic blockade therapy in coronary syndromes in the modern management era?]. / Bêta-bloquants et syndromes coronariens: les réponses d'hier s'appliquent-elles aux stratégies d'aujourd'hui?

This paper shows the eventual benefits of treatment with beta-blockers in post-myocardial infarction. An overview of main clinical trials that have been conducted to test this therapeutic in acute coronary syndrome. In patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, the early use of intravenous beta-blockers had shown a modest and non significant reduction in mortality. Substantial reductions in mortality and reinfarction have been demonstrated when beta-blockers have been used soon after an acute myocardial infarction and continued long-term. However, these benefits were observed in randomised clinical trials conducted in the 1970s and 1980s, prior to the widespread use of reperfusion therapies and antiplatelet agents. It appears obvious that the long-term use of beta-blockers may be questionable after any acute coronary syndrome especially if complete reperfusion has been achieved and left ventricular function is preserved.

[Is there a role for calcium antagonists when beta-adrenergic blockade therapy is contraindicated in post-myocardial infarction?]. / Quelle est la place des inhibiteurs calciques lorsque les bêta-bloquants sont contre-indiqués dans le traitement du post-infarctus du myocarde?

The purpose of this paper is to examine the eventual benefits of treatment with calcium channel blockers in post-myocardial infarction, through an overview of main placebo-controlled trials that have been conducted to test this therapeutic in acute coronary syndromes. It appears obvious that the vast majority of these trials was conducted in the pre-reperfusion era and failed to demonstrate a reduction in mortality. To conclude, the superiority of a therapy with calcium antagonists over a placebo in the management of post-myocardial infarction remains unknown. In contrast, adverse effects associated with the prescription of calcium antagonists are well known.