Warfarin therapy initiated before is more beneficial than after transesophageal echocardiography detected left atrial thrombus.

OBJECTIVE: Warfarin anticoagulation significantly reduces the risk of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are many patients with AF who begin anticoagulation only after left atrial thrombus (LAT) is detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The impact of anticoagulation in these patients has not been clearly described. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) among AF patients who began warfarin before LAT was detected by TEE compared to those who began warfarin only after TEE demonstrated LAT and those did not receive warfarin at any point. METHOD: Of the 90 consecutive AF patients with LAT (male 48, female 42, age 71.5 +/- 10.1 years), 49 began warfarin more than 3 weeks before TEE (Group I); 29 began warfarin after TEE (Group II); and 12 did not receive warfarin at all (Group III). RESULTS: The incidence of CVA in Group I (14%, 7/49, prior CVA 5, new CVA after TEE 2) was significantly lower than Group II (45%, 13/29, prior CVA 10, new CVA after TEE 3, P = 0.006) and III (42%, 5/12, prior CVA 3, new CVA after TEE 2, P = 0.047). Patients with persistent LAT had significantly higher incidence (64% vs 23%, P = 0.024) of CVA and lower CVA free survival than those with resolved LAT. CONCLUSION: The incidence of CVA among AF patients, who began warfarin before LAT detection, is significantly lower than those who began warfarin after LAT detection as well as those who did not receive warfarin at all.

Pacemaker utilization during permanent atrial fibrillation in patients who received pacemaker implantation for sinus node dysfunction.

Patients who have pacemakers and sinus node dysfunction frequently have atrial fibrillation (AF). The need for continued pacemaker therapy after conversion to permanent AF remains uncertain. This study showed that, among 174 patients who received pacemaker implantation for sinus node dysfunction, 38% (n = 62) had the minimum intrinsic ventricular rate of >60 beats/min after conversion to AF. The pacemaker memory showed that 30 patients (18%) never used ventricular pacing during permanent AF. The study results suggest that patients who have a stable intrinsic ventricular rate during permanent AF by serial assessment may no longer need continued pacemaker therapy.

The impact of povidone-iodine pocket irrigation use on pacemaker and defibrillator infections.

BACKGROUND: Infection is a devastating complication of permanent pacemakers (PMs) implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Many implanting physicians commonly use povidone-iodine solution to irrigate the device pocket before implanting the device. We sought to assess if such a measure would alter the rate of infection. METHODS: A total of 2,564 consecutive patients who received implantable PM or ICD devices between 1994 and 2002 were studied. Povidone-iodine was used for pocket irrigation in 53% and saline in 47%. A total of 18 (0.7%) patients developed pocket infections with 0.7% (10/1,359) in povidone-iodine (group I) and 0.6% (8/1,205) in saline (group II) pocket irrigation (p = ns). Groups I and II were studied for various clinical and demographic variables described in the results section. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between groups I and II, respectively. ICDs were most frequently infected than PMs (56% vs 44%). Most (83%) of the devices were dual chamber. Reopening of the pocket for either lead or generator replacement had a higher incidence of infection than new implants (61% vs 39%). There was no difference in the use of preimplantation antibiotic prophylaxis. Late (61%) and deep pocket infections (78%) were more common than early (39%) and superficial infections (22%). Blood cultures were positive in 67% and Staphylococcus aureus was the common most pathogen (50%). The mean duration of antibiotics use after the diagnosis of device infection was 35 +/- 23 days with 72% requiring device explantation. The device was reimplanted on the contralateral side in 56% cases. One patient in each group died due to device infection and related complications. No significant allergy to iodine was seen in either group. CONCLUSION: Povidone-iodine irrigation of the subcutaneous pocket did not alter the rates of pocket infection after pacemaker/defibrillator implantation.

Amiodarone versus sotalol for the treatment of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery: the Reduction in Postoperative Cardiovascular Arrhythmic Events (REDUCE) trial.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of amiodarone and sotalol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) following open heart surgery. BACKGROUND: The incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias following open heart surgery ranges from 20% to 40%, with AF being the most common. Both amiodarone and sotalol have been shown to be effective in reducing postoperative arrhythmias, but no direct comparison of these agents has been conducted. METHODS: A total of 160 patients were randomized, of whom 134 underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) alone, 17 underwent CABG and concomitant aortic valve replacement surgery (AVR), 9 underwent AVR only, and 1 patient's surgery was canceled. Patients with signs or symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF), ejection fraction < or =30%, estimated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, or serum creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive either sotalol 80 mg 2 times per day (n = 76) or intravenous amiodarone 15 mg/kg over 24 hours followed by oral amiodarone 200 mg 3 times per day (n = 83). Study drug was started at the time of surgery and continued for 7 days or until discharge, whichever came first. RESULTS: AF occurred in 17% of patients randomized to amiodarone and 25% of the patients randomized to sotalol (P =.21). However, the duration of AF was significantly shorter in amiodarone-treated patients (169 +/- 224 min) compared to sotalol treated patients (487 +/- 505 min; P =.04). In a subgroup analysis, the incidence of AF in patients undergoing AVR or CABG with AVR was significantly less with amiodarone (1/15, 7%) compared to sotalol (9/11, 82%) (P <.001). Blood pressure was lower immediately after surgery with amiodarone but comparable to sotalol at 24 hours. Of the hemodynamic indices measured, only stroke volume was significantly lower in patients randomized to sotalol at 24 hours (P =.035). CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone and sotalol share similar efficacy and safety in reducing postoperative AF. Hemodynamic effects were similar between both drugs at 24 hours, with the exception that stroke volume was lower in sotalol-treated patients. In patients undergoing more complex surgery, postoperative AF occurred more frequently with sotalol than with amiodarone.

Comparison of recurrence rates after direct-current cardioversion for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients receiving versus those not receiving rhythm-control drug therapy.

The AFFIRM investigators have recommended rate control as the preferred strategy for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF), but the appropriate strategy for new-onset persistent AF is uncertain. Our study evaluated the AF recurrence rate and the impact of rhythm-control drugs (class 1A, 1C, and 3 antiarrhythmic drugs) on patients with new-onset persistent AF after successful direct-current (DC) cardioversion. Consecutive patients who underwent DC cardioversion of AF from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1999 were screened for new-onset persistent AF, and 150 patients met the inclusion criteria. After the first DC cardioversion, 50 patients received rhythm-control drugs (rhythm-control group) and the other 100 did not (rate-control group). The 2 groups had similar clinical characteristics except for a lower ejection fraction (44 +/- 14% vs 49 +/- 14%, p <0.01) and a higher proportion of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (20% vs 1%, p = 0.03) in the rhythm-control group versus the rate-control group. During the follow-up period there was a trend toward a lower rate of early AF recurrence at 24 hours after DC cardioversion in the rhythm-control group versus the rate-control group (6% vs 16%, p = 0.11), but there was a high recurrence rate of AF in both groups at 1 month (30% for the rhythm-control group vs 41% for the rate-control group, p = 0.25). At the end of the follow-up period, rhythm-control therapy was abandoned in 78% of the rhythm-control group patients after the failure of 1 to 3 rhythm-control drugs. In the rate-control group, rhythm-control therapy was attempted after AF recurrence in 62 patients but was later abandoned in 48 patients (77%) because of treatment failure. Therefore, the high incidence of treatment failure with rhythm-control therapy suggests that rate control with anticoagulation should be preferred in patients with new-onset persistent AF if AF recurs after DC cardioversion.

Transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion of recurrent atrial fibrillation: does absence of previous atrial thrombi preclude the need of a repeat test?

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recurrent problem that frequently requires repeat cardioversion. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is indicated before cardioversion in patients who are underanticoagulated (warfarin therapy <3 weeks or international normalized ratio [INR] <2.0). It remains uncertain if TEE should be repeated in underanticoagulated patients who had no atrial thrombi detected by previous TEE. Methods and results From January 1996 to June 2001, 76 patients (43 men, 33 women; mean age, 68.8 +/- 10.4 years) who were underanticoagulated and had no atrial thrombi in previous TEE underwent repeat TEE before cardioversion of recurrent AF. The duration of recurrent AF at the time of the second TEE was 5.1 +/- 9.3 months (1 day to 4 years). The underlying diseases included coronary artery disease (n = 30), hypertension (n = 22), valvular heart diseases (n = 8), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 4), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 2), and others (n = 10). Eight (10.5%) patients (2 men, 6 women; mean age, 68.6 +/- 6.6 years) were found to have intra-atrial thrombi on the second TEE. Of these 8 patients, 3 had coronary artery disease, 1 had hypertension, 2 had dilated cardiomyopathy, 1 had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 1 had AF of unknown cause. The duration of recurrent AF in patients with and without thrombi was not significantly different (3.6 +/- 4.7 versus 5.3 +/- 9.7 months, P =.22). Of the 8 patients with intra-atrial thrombi on the second TEE, 5 had been taking warfarin for 3 to 4 weeks but had subtherapeutic INR and 3 were taking aspirin only. Compared with patients without intra-atrial thrombi, patients with intra-atrial thrombi had lower ejection fraction (32.5% +/- 18.1% versus 49.9% +/- 14.1%, P =.015), slower left atrial appendage empty velocity (0.22 +/- 0.08 versus 0.41 +/- 0.17 m/s, P <.01), and higher prevalence of spontaneous echo contrast (87.5%) than in patients without intra-atrial thrombi (19.1%, P <.05) but similar left atrial size (49.5 +/- 5.3 versus 47.3 +/- 7.1 mm, P =.15). Cardioversion was cancelled in all patients with atrial thrombi. CONCLUSIONS: In underanticoagulated patients, repeat TEE is necessary before cardioversion of recurrent AF even if the previous TEE showed no atrial thrombi.