Who is in the revolving door? Policy and practice implications of recurrent reports to adult protective services.

Repeat referral to adult protective services APS (recurrence) is a much-discussed topic among APS agencies as it may indicate ongoing harm, yet there is limited research examining prevalence or causes. This paper provides a foundational investigation of recurrence within a California APS county program. Drawing from thirty-three months of de-identified reports, we used logistic regression to examine the impact of intake report characteristics on repeat referral within one year after baseline case closure. One-fifth of the sample was recurrent (19.9%, n=987/4,958), with self-neglect being the most common type of report to recur (14.3%, n=307/2,141). Overall recurrence was predicted by female gender, older age, living alone, and multiple elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) types reported at baseline, and report placed by social service provider, friends, family, landlords, and victim self-reports. Reporters personally related to the victim and social service providers are potential partners in identifying ANE, and alternate intervention approaches may be necessary.

Toward a better understanding of the elder abuse forensic center model: comparing and contrasting four programs in California.

Resolving elder abuse, neglect, and self-neglect often requires the authority and expertise of multiple providers. Prior research of the elder abuse forensic center (FC) model, although limited, has indicated strong member support, increases in prosecution of abusers, and increases in conservatorship for those lacking capacity. This study expands on previous single-site research by conducting a cross-site multimethod evaluation of four established FCs to better describe the model and inform its replication with fidelity. Data were compiled from FC administrative data, site visits completed from 2011-2012, and a follow-up telephone interviews conducted in 2018. Site characteristics, processes, desired outcomes, and long-term sustainability were compared. All FCs had dedicated staff who convened a multidisciplinary team (MDT) of medical, legal, and social services providers to jointly engage in case review, consultation, and provision of supportive professional services. Similar results were observed across all sites in team effectiveness and member-perceived improvements in personal practice and inter-agency relationships. While three programs had unified philosophies and practice approaches, one employed a distinct model and was no longer in operation at follow-up. Commonalities in case characteristics, program structure, processes, and outcomes provide insight into the core model components and a foundation for continued program replication and standardization.