Comparing internal and external stabilization for traumatic elbow instability: a systematic review.

Background: Despite surgical reestablishment of the supporting structures, instability may often persist in traumatic elbow injury. In these cases, a temporary internal or external fixator may be indicated to unload the repaired structures and maintain joint concentricity. Aggregate data are needed to characterize the risk of complication between external fixation (ExFix) and the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) when used for traumatic elbow instability. Our objective was to review the literature to compare the complication profile between external fixation and the IJS. Methods: A database query was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome characteristics for eligibility were the following: for patients over 18 years clinical outcomes were compared between an ExFix or the IJS for acute or chronic elbow instability. The Cochran risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions and grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation framework were compiled for risk of bias and quality assessment. Results: The rate of recurrent instability was 4.1% in the IJS group (N = 171) and 7.0% in the ExFix group (N = 435), with an odds ratio of 1.93 (95% confidence interval 0.88-4.23). The rate of device failure was 4.4% in the IJS group and 4.1% in the ExFix group. Pin-related complications occurred in 14.6% of ExFix cases. Complications in the IJS group were the following: 1 case of inflammatory reaction, 4 cases of post removal surgical site infection, and 5 symptomatic removals. Discussion: The literature demonstrates a distinct difference in complication profile between external fixation and the IJS when used as treatment for traumatic elbow instability. Although not statistically significant, the higher rate of recurrent instability following external fixation may be clinically important. The high rate of pin-related complications with external fixation is notable.

Local adiposity may be a more reliable predictor for infection than body mass index following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Improved understanding of the factors that predispose TKA patients to infection has considerable economic and medical impact. BMI is commonly used as a proxy for obesity to determine the risk of postoperative infection. However, this metric appears to be fraught with inconsistency in this application. BMI is a simple calculation which provides general insight into body habitus. But it fails to account for anatomic distribution of adipose tissue and the proportion of the mass that is skeletal muscle. Our objective was to review the literature to determine if local adiposity was more predictive than BMI for infection following TKA. METHODS: A database search was performed for the following PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) characteristics: local measurements of adiposity (defined as soft tissue thickness or fat thickness or soft tissue envelope at the knee) in patients over 18 years of age treated with total knee arthroplasty used to determine the relationship between local adiposity and the risk of infection (defined as prosthetic joint infection or wound complication or surgical site infection). Quality was assessed using the GRADE framework and bias was assessed using ROBINS-I . RESULTS: Six articles (N=7081) met the inclusion criteria. Four of the six articles determined that adiposity was more associated with or was a better predictor for infection risk than BMI. One of the six articles concluded that increased adiposity was protective for short term infection and that BMI was not associated with the outcome of interest. One of the six articles determined that BMI was more strongly associated with PJI risk than soft tissue thickness. CONCLUSION: The use of adiposity as a proxy for obesity in preoperative evaluation of TKA patients is an emerging concept. Although limited by heterogeneity, the current literature suggests that local adiposity may be a more reliable predictor for infection than BMI following primary TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV systematic review.

Metacarpal fractures.

Metacarpal fractures are common and can be functionally disabling. The majority are managed non-operatively. When surgical intervention is indicated, various methods of fixation are available with the utility of each being based on injury pattern, patient function and surgeon preference. Early mobilization, especially in case of open reduction and internal fixation, is a critical component of treatment to prevent stiffness and restore function. When possible, a fixation construct that can withstand the applied forces of early postoperative motion is chosen. We provide an updated description for diagnosis, treatment options and operative fixation for metacarpal fractures.

Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Controlled Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we assess the effects that morbid obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40) has on: (1) Ninety-day medical complications and readmission rates; (2) costs of care and lengths of stay (LOS); and (3) 2-year implant complications in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective query of TKA and UKA patients were identified using a national database. Morbidly obese UKA patients were matched 1:5 to morbidly obese TKA patients by demographic and comorbidity profiles. Subgroup analyses were conducted using the same process between morbidly obese UKA patients and BMI <40 TKA patients, as well as to BMI <40 UKA patients. RESULTS: Morbidly obese patients who underwent UKA had significantly fewer medical complications, readmissions, and periprosthetic joint infections than TKA patients; however, UKA patients had greater odds of mechanical loosening (ML). The TKA patients had significantly longer LOS (3.0 versus 2.4 days, P < .001), as well as significantly greater costs of care than UKA patients ($12,869 versus $7,105). Morbidly obese UKA patients had similar rates of medical complications, and significantly lower readmissions, decreased LOS, and decreased costs when compared to TKA patients who had a BMI <40. CONCLUSION: In patients who have morbid obesity, complications were decreased in UKA compared to TKA. Moreover, morbidly obese UKA patients had lower medical utilizations and similar complication rates when compared to TKA patients with the recommended cutoff of BMI <40. However, UKA patients had greater rates of ML than TKA patients. A UKA may be an acceptable treatment option for unicompartmental osteoarthritis in morbidly obese patients.