Extended Length of Stay After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Stroke: A Single-Center Analysis of 703 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is crucial for improving functional outcomes for acute ischemic stroke. Length of stay (LOS) is a reimbursement metric implemented to incentivize value-based care. Our study aims to identify predictors of LOS in patients undergoing MT at a high-volume center in the United States. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent MT at a single institution from 2017 to 2023. Patients who experienced mortality during their course of hospital stay were excluded from this study. Extended LOS (eLOS) was defined as the upper quartile (≥75th) of the median duration of hospital stay. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, with P values < .05 denoting statistical significance. RESULTS: Seven hundred three patients met criteria for inclusion. The median age of the cohort was 72 years (IQR: 61-82), and 57.2% was female. The median LOS was 6, IQR: 4-10. A total of 28.9% of the cohort (n = 203) patients experienced eLOS. The multivariate regression model identified age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.15-2.44), and hemorrhagic transformation of stroke (OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 0.39-0.90) as predictors of eLOS, whereas antiplatelet use before admission (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.89) and higher baseline modified Rankin Scale before stroke were associated with lower odds (OR: 0.59 [0.39-0.90]; P < .05) of eLOS. CONCLUSION: By identifying predictors of eLOS, we provide a foundation for targeted interventions aimed at optimizing post-thrombectomy care pathways and improving patient outcomes. The implications of our study extend beyond clinical practice, offering insights into healthcare resource utilization, reimbursement strategies, and value-based care initiatives.

Baseline Frailty Measured by the Risk Analysis Index and 30-Day Mortality After Surgery for Spinal Malignancy: Analysis of a Prospective Registry (2011-2020).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic utility of baseline frailty, measured by the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), for prediction of postoperative mortality among patients with spinal malignancy (SM) undergoing resection. METHODS: SM surgery cases were queried from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2011-2020). The relationship between preoperative RAI frailty score and increasing rate of primary endpoint (mortality or discharge to hospice within 30 days, "mortality/hospice") were assessed. Discriminatory accuracy was assessed by computation of C-statistics (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2,235 cases were stratified by RAI score: 0-20, 22.7%; 21-30, 11.9%; 31-40, 54.7%; and ≥ 41, 10.7%. The rate of mortality/hospice was 6.5%, which increased linearly with increasing RAI score (p < 0.001). RAI was also associated with increasing rates of major complication, extended length of stay, and nonhome discharge (all p < 0.05). The RAI demonstrated acceptable discriminatory accuracy for prediction of primary endpoint (C-statistic, 0.717; 95% CI, 0.697-0.735). In pairwise ROC comparison, RAI demonstrated superiority versus modified frailty index-5 and chronological age (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative frailty, as measured by RAI, is a robust predictor of mortality/ hospice after SM surgery. The frailty score may be applied in clinical settings using a user-friendly calculator, deployed here: https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/spinalMalignancyRAI/.

Predictors of Extended Length of Stay after Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite their asymptomatic occurrence, unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) account for a significant proportion of hospital charges and healthcare resource utilization in the United States. Hospital length of stay (LOS) is a reimbursement metric utilized to incentivize value-based care. Our study identifies predictors of extended LOS (eLOS) after elective treatment of UIAs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 525 patients who underwent elective treatment of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) at a single institution. Data was collected with regard to demographics, clinical presentation, treatment characteristics and post-operative outcomes. The primary outcome, eLOS, was defined as hospital stay in the upper quartile of the median (≥75th percentile). Univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to identify factors predictive of eLOS in this cohort. RESULTS: The average age of the cohort was 61.40, standard deviation (SD)= 11.41. 77.3% of the cohort was female. The median duration of LOS was 2 days (interquartile range (IQR): 1-5). 11.6% experienced eLOS (≥5 days). Multivariate logistic regression identified age (OR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01- 1.07), co-existent vascular pathology (OR: 21.33, 95% CI: 8.06- 56.39), open surgery (OR: 3.93, 95% CI: 1.85- 8.34) and post-operative stroke (OR: 11.72, 95% CI: 3.18- 43.18) as independent predictors of eLOS. CONCLUSION: Our study identified predictors of eLOS that could help promote risk stratification prior to treatment of UIAs. Future research that identifies predictors of long term outcomes based on treatment modality could help identify ways to improve healthcare resource utilization in this cohort.

Reporting of Participant Race and Ethnicity in Cerebrovascular Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide information on appropriate management protocols in patients with cerebrovascular diseases. Despite growing evidence of race and ethnicity being independent predictors of outcomes, recent literature has drawn attention to inadequate reporting of these demographic profiles across RCTs. To our knowledge, the adherence to reporting race and/or ethnicity in cerebrovascular RCTs remains undescribed. Our study describes trends in the reporting of race and/or ethnicity across cerebrovascular RCTs. METHODS: Web of Science was searched to identify the top 100-cited cerebrovascular RCTs. Additional articles were retrieved from guidelines issued by the American Heart Association (AHA) for the management of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess for factors influencing reporting of race/ ethnicity. RESULTS: 65% of cerebrovascular RCTs lacked reporting of participant race and/ or ethnicity. Multivariate regression revealed that studies from North America had a 14.74- fold higher odds (95% CI: 4.574- 47.519] of reporting race/ ethnicity. Impact factor of the journal was associated with a 1.007-fold odds of reporting race/ ethnicity [95% CI: 1.000- 1.013]. Reporting of race and/or ethnicity did not increase with time, or vary according to the number of participating centers, median number of study participants, source of funding or category of RCT. Among RCTs that reported race, Blacks and Asians were underrepresented compared to Whites. CONCLUSION: 65% of prominent cerebrovascular RCTs lack adequate reporting of participant race/ ethnicity. Reasons for inadequate reporting of these variables remain unclear and warrant additional investigation.

Initial Experience with the Eclipse Double-lumen Balloon Catheter for Embolization of Cranial Vascular Malformations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Double lumen balloon catheters (DLBCs) have emerged as a potential alternative to single lumen balloon catheters (SLBCs) for endovascular embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs). This study describes our preliminary experience with the Eclipse 2L DLBC in treating AVMs and dAVFs. METHODS: Patients who underwent embolization of cranial dAVFs or AVMs at our institution from August 2021 to March 2024 were included. Spinal vascular malformations were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze procedural outcomes, technical nuances and post-operative outcome on follow-up. RESULTS: 25 patients who underwent 38 embolization procedures (15 AVMs and 23 dAVFs) met criteria for inclusion in this study. The mean age of the cohort was 52.44 (standard deviation (SD)= 17.26), and 48% of the overall cohort (n= 13) was female. The average procedure times for AVMs and dAVFs were 80.4 minutes and 96.73 minutes, respectively. There was one instance of catheter entrapment. Two patients in the AVM cohort experienced mortality and one experienced post-operative rupture. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience using the Eclipse 2L balloon catheter for Onyx embolization reported procedural outcomes comparable to other DLBCs despite relatively higher procedure times and radiation doses. Further long-term studies on its efficacy as primary modality in treating AVMs and dAVFs are encouraged.

Risk Analysis Index Predicts Nonhome Discharge Following Resection of Cavernous Malformations.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial cavernous malformations (CMs) are benign vascular lesions associated with hemorrhage, seizures, and corresponding neurological deficits. Recent evidence shows that frailty predicts neurosurgical adverse outcomes with superior discrimination compared to greater patient age. Therefore, we utilized the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) to predict adverse outcomes following cavernous malformation resection (CMR). METHODS: This retrospective study utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify patients who underwent craniotomy for CMR (2019-2020). Multivariate analysis used RAI to assess the ability of frailty to predict nonhome discharge (NHD), extended length of stay (eLOS), and postoperative adverse outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis evaluated the discriminatory accuracy of RAI for prediction of NHD. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred CMR patients were identified. Mean patient age was 38±1.2 years, 53.3% (N=640) were female, and 58.3% (N=700) had private insurance. Patients were stratified into 4 frailty tiers based on RAI scores: "robust" (0-20, R), N=905 (80.8%); "normal" (21-30, N), N=110 (9.8%); "frail" (31-40, F), N=25 (2.2%); and "very frail" (41+, VF), N = 80 (7.1%). Increasing frailty was associated with eLOS and higher rates of NHD (P<0.05). The RAI demonstrated strong discriminatory accuracy (C-statistic=0.722) for prediction of NHD following CMR in area under the receiver operating characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative frailty independently predicts adverse outcomes, including eLOS and NHD in patients undergoing resection of cranial CMs. Integrating RAI into preoperative frailty risk assessment may optimize risk stratification and improve patient selection and reallocate perioperative management resources for better patient outcomes.

Assessing readability of online patient educational material on concussion and return to play.

OBJECTIVE: Concussions are self-limited forms of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Gradual return to play (RTP) is crucial to minimizing the risk of second impact syndrome. Online patient educational materials (OPEM) are often used to guide decision-making. Previous literature has reported that grade-level readability of OPEM is higher than recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health. The authors evaluated the readability of OPEM on concussion and RTP. METHODS: An online search engine was used to identify websites providing OPEM on concussion and RTP. Text specific to concussion and RTP was extracted from each website and readability was assessed using the following six standardized indices: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index, and Automated Readability Index. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to compare readability across sources of information. RESULTS: There were 59 concussion and RTP articles, and readability levels exceeded the recommended 6th grade level, irrespective of the source of information. Academic institutions published OPEM at simpler readability levels (higher FRE scores). Private organizations published OPEM at more complex (higher) grade-level readability levels in comparison with academic and nonprofit institutions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The readability of OPEM on RTP after concussions exceeds the literacy of the average American. There is a critical need to modify the concussion and RTP OPEM to improve comprehension by a broad audience.

The Era of Radial-Specific Catheters: A Multicenter Comparison of the Armadillo and RIST Catheters in Transradial Procedures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As the radial approach is gaining popularity in neurointervention, new radial-specific catheters are being manufactured while taking into consideration the smaller size of the radial artery, different trajectories of angles into the great vessels from the arm, and subsequent force vectors. We compared outcomes of transradial procedures performed using the Armadillo catheter (Q'Apel Medical Inc.) and the RIST radial guide catheter (Medtronic). METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study comparing outcomes of transradial neuroendovascular procedures using the Armadillo and RIST catheters at 2 institutions between 2021 and 2024. RESULTS: The study comprised 206 patients, 96 of whom underwent procedures using the Armadillo and 110 using the RIST. Age and sex were comparable across cohorts. In most procedures, 1 target vessel was catheterized (Armadillo: 94.8% vs 89.1%, P = .29) with no significant difference between cohorts. The use of an intermediate catheter was minimal in both cohorts (Armadillo 5.2% vs RIST: 2.7%, P = .36), and the median number of major vessel catheterization did not significantly differ between cohorts (Armadillo: 1 [1-4] vs RIST: 1 [0-6], P = .21). Failure to catheterize the target vessel was encountered in 1 case in each cohort (Armadillo: 1.0% vs RIST: 0.9%, P = .18), and the rate did not significantly differ between cohorts. Similarly, the rate of conversion to femoral access was comparable between cohorts (Armadillo: 2.1% vs RIST: 1.8%, P = .55). There was no significant difference in access site complications (Armadillo: 1% vs RIST: 2.8%, P = .55) or neurological complications (Armadillo: 3.1% vs RIST: 5.5%, P = .42) between cohorts. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in successful catheterization of target vessels, procedure duration, triaxial system use, complication rates, or the need for transfemoral cross-over was observed between both catheters. Both devices offer high and comparable rates of technical success and low morbidity rates.

Correlation of Computed Tomography Angiography to Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Stenosis with Real-World Assessment of Overestimation of Carotid Stenosis on Computed Tomography Angiography.

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a well-established diagnostic modality for carotid stenosis. However, false-positive CTA results may expose patients to unnecessary procedural complications in cases where surgical intervention is not warranted. We aim to assess the correlation of CTA to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in carotid stenosis and characterize patients who were referred for intervention based on CTA and did not require it based on DSA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 186 patients who underwent carotid angioplasty and stenting following preprocedural CTA at our institution from April 2017 to December 2022. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 186 patients (11.2%) were found to have <50% carotid stenosis on DSA (discordant group). Severe plaque calcification on CTA was associated with a discordant degree of stenosis on DSA (LR+=7.4). Among 186 patients, agreement between the percentage of stenosis from CTA and DSA was weak-moderate (r2=0.27, P<0.01). Among concordant pairs, we found moderate-strong agreement between CTA and DSA (adj r2=0.37) (P < 0.0001). Of 186 patients, 127 patients had CTA stenosis of ≥70%, and 59 had CTA of 50%-69%. Correlation between CTA and DSA in severe CTA stenosis was weak (r2=0.11, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stenosis found on CTA, over 88% also had stenosis on DSA, with this positive predictive value in line with previous studies. The percent-stenosis value from CTA and DSA was weakly correlated but does not affect the overall clinical judgement of stenosis. Severe calcification found on CTA may potentially indicate nonstenosis on DSA.

Use of the Scepter Dual-Lumen Balloon Catheter for Transarterial Onyx Embolization of Cranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Dual-lumen balloon microcatheters allow for controlled anterograde flow of Onyx while providing proximal flow arrest, thereby obviating the need for a second microcatheter or Onyx plug formation. We sought to assess the safety and efficiency of the Scepter dual-lumen balloon microcatheter in trans arterial Onyx embolization of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 36 patients with cranial DAVFs in which a Scepter balloon microcatheter was used between 2016 and 2023. RESULTS: Our study comprised 36 patients, mostly male (n = 23, 63.8%) with a mean age of 60.8 years. Most DAVFs were in the occipital lobe (n = 24, 66.7%), and 50% had external carotid artery supply from the occipital artery. Eighteen (50%) of DAVFs were Cognard type III and IV, respectively. About one third (33.3%, n = 12) of the DAVFs drained into the transverse sigmoid junction, and 27.7% (n = 10) had direct cortical venous drainage into supratentorial or posterior fossa veins. Complete occlusion was obtained in 22 (61.1%) patients while partial occlusion was observed in 14 (38.9%) patients. One patient (2.8%) developed a retroperitoneal hematoma. At final follow-up, complete occlusion was observed in 21 (77.8%) and partial occlusion was observed in 8 (22.2%). Recurrence was observed in 4/30 (13.3%) patients, and retreatment was required in 6 (18.75%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: At midterm follow-up, our study showed low morbidity and modest complete occlusion rates using the Scepter for transarterial Onyx embolization of high-grade DAVFs.

Assessing the predictive value of the Risk Analysis Index for short-term outcomes in acute spinal cord injury surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) requires rapid surgical intervention to maximize neurological function. Older patients comprise an increasingly larger proportion of SCI patients annually, necessitating accurate preoperative risk stratification tools. This study utilized a frailty-based preoperative risk stratification score to predict adverse events following non-elective neurosurgical intervention for acute tSCI patients. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for acute tSCI patients aged ≥18 who underwent spine surgery in 2019-2020. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) was implemented with crosstabulation, to analyze frailty scores with the following binary outcome measures: overall complications, non-home discharge (NHD), extended length of stay (eLOS) (>75th percentile), and mortality. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) analysis assessed the discriminative threshold of RAI compared to the modified 5-item Frailty Index (mFI-5) for NHD and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 9995 SCI patients underwent non-elective spine surgery. There were 1525 perioperative complications (15.3%) and 510 (5.1%) mortalities. An increasing RAI score was significantly associated with increasing postoperative mortality rates: RAI 0-20 (1.5%, N.=45), RAI 21-30 (3.4%, N.=110), RAI 31-40 (6.8%, N.=115), and RAI>41 (11.8%, N.=240) (P<0.001). RAI demonstrated superior discrimination compared to the mFI-5 for mortality and NHD with a C-statistic >0.72. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing frailty, as measured by RAI, was a reliable predictor of non-home discharge and 30-day mortality for SCI patients who underwent non-elective spinal surgery and RAI demonstrated superior discrimination compared to the mFI-5 for NHD and mortality.

An Appraisal of the Quality of Development and Reporting of Predictive Models in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Significant evidence has indicated that the reporting quality of novel predictive models is poor because of confounding by small data sets, inappropriate statistical analyses, and a lack of validation and reproducibility. The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement was developed to increase the generalizability of predictive models. This study evaluated the quality of predictive models reported in neurosurgical literature through their compliance with the TRIPOD guidelines. METHODS: Articles reporting prediction models published in the top 5 neurosurgery journals by SCImago Journal Rank-2 (Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, and Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry) between January 1st, 2018, and January 1st, 2023, were identified through a PubMed search strategy that combined terms related to machine learning and prediction modeling. These original research articles were analyzed against the TRIPOD criteria. RESULTS: A total of 110 articles were assessed with the TRIPOD checklist. The median compliance was 57.4% (IQR: 50.0%-66.7%). Models using machine learning-based models exhibited lower compliance on average compared with conventional learning-based models (57.1%, 50.0%-66.7% vs 68.1%, 50.2%-68.1%, P = .472). Among the TRIPOD criteria, the lowest compliance was observed in blinding the assessment of predictors and outcomes (n = 7, 12.7% and n = 10, 16.9%, respectively), including an informative title (n = 17, 15.6%) and reporting model performance measures such as confidence intervals (n = 27, 24.8%). Few studies provided sufficient information to allow for the external validation of results (n = 26, 25.7%). CONCLUSION: Published predictive models in neurosurgery commonly fall short of meeting the established guidelines laid out by TRIPOD for optimal development, validation, and reporting. This lack of compliance may represent the minor extent to which these models have been subjected to external validation or adopted into routine clinical practice in neurosurgery.

Frailty in intracranial meningioma resection: the risk analysis index demonstrates strong discrimination for predicting non-home discharge and in-hospital mortality.

PURPOSE: Frailty is an independent risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes following intracranial meningioma resection (IMR). The role of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) in predicting postoperative outcomes following IMR is nascent but may inform preoperative patient selection and surgical planning. METHODS: IMR patients from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were identified using diagnostic and procedural codes (2019-2020). The relationship between preoperative RAI-measured frailty and primary outcomes (non-home discharge (NHD), in-hospital mortality) and secondary outcomes (extended length of stay (eLOS), complication rates) was assessed via multivariate analyses. The discriminatory accuracy of the RAI for primary outcomes was measured in area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 23,230 IMR patients (mean age = 59) were identified, with frailty statuses stratified by RAI score: 0-20 "robust" (R)(N = 10,665, 45.9%), 21-30 "normal" (N)(N = 8,895, 38.3%), 31-40 "frail" (F)(N = 2,605, 11.2%), and 41+ "very frail" (VF)(N = 1,065, 4.6%). Rates of NHD (R 11.5%, N 29.7%, F 60.8%, VF 61.5%), in-hospital mortality (R 0.5%, N 1.8%, F 3.8%, VF 7.0%), eLOS (R 13.2%, N 21.5%, F 40.9%, VF 46.0%), and complications (R 7.5%, N 11.6%, F 15.7%, VF 16.0%) significantly increased with increasing frailty thresholds (p < 0.001). The RAI demonstrated strong discrimination for NHD (C-statistic: 0.755) and in-hospital mortality (C-statistic: 0.754) in AUROC curve analysis. CONCLUSION: Increasing RAI-measured frailty is significantly associated with increased complication rates, eLOS, NHD, and in-hospital mortality following IMR. The RAI demonstrates strong discrimination for predicting NHD and in-hospital mortality following IMR, and may aid in preoperative risk stratification.

Frailty predicts non-home discharge in anterior lumbar interbody fusion patients.

BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a well-established surgical approach in the treatment of degenerative pathology, trauma, infection, and neoplasia of the spine. This study sought to assess the usefulness of frailty as a predictor of non-home discharge (NHD) for patients who undergo the procedure. METHODS: Patient cases were extracted from the American College of Surgeons's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020. Univariable and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to compare the 5-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) to the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) in relation to NHD. RESULTS: Simple linear regression demonstrated that increasing frailty was associated with an increased likelihood of NHD among 25,317 patients (mFI-5 odds ratio: 2.13, 3.23, 8.4; RAI-rev odds ratio: 3.22, 9.6, 23.6 [P<0.001 for all]). In each instance, a Cochran-Armitage trend test was significant (P<0.001), indicating a linear association of increasing odds. The RAI-rev resulted in a C-statistic of 0.722, compared to 0.628 for the mFI-5, and was shown to have superior discriminative ability with a DeLong Test (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, as measured by mFI-5 and RAI-rev, was associated with an increased likelihood of NHD in patients who underwent ALIF. This finding supports recent literature on the promising utility of these indices, especially the RAI-rev, in preoperative decision-making across multiple facets of neurosurgery.

Frailty as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Baseline frailty status has been utilized to predict a wide range of outcomes and guide preoperative decision making in neurosurgery. This systematic review aims to analyze existing literature on the utilization of frailty as a predictor of neurosurgical outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that utilized baseline frailty status to predict outcomes after a neurosurgical intervention were included in this systematic review. Studies that utilized sarcopenia as the sole measure of frailty were excluded. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was searched from inception to March 1st, 2023, to identify relevant articles. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, 244 studies met the inclusion criteria. The 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) was the most utilized frailty measure (N.=91, 37.2%) followed by the five-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) (N.=80, 32.7%). Spine surgery was the most common subspecialty (N.=131, 53.7%), followed by intracranial tumor resection (N.=57, 23.3%), and post-operative complications were the most reported outcome (N.=130, 53.2%) in neurosurgical frailty studies. The USA and the Bowers author group published the greatest number of articles within the study period (N.=176, 72.1% and N.=37, 15.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty literature has grown exponentially over the years and has been incorporated into neurosurgical decision making. Although a wide range of frailty indices exist, their utility may vary according to their ability to be incorporated in the outpatient clinical setting.

A Medical Student's Guide to Online Resources in Neurosurgery.

Early exposure to neurosurgery during medical school is critical to improving recruitment into the specialty. About 30% of medical schools in the U.S. lack a home program in neurosurgery, thereby, limiting their exposure to the field of neurosurgery. The transition to virtual education was largely facilitated through webinars during the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic. Advantages of these resources include their widespread global outreach, with a large number of attendees being international medical students. Although many such resources exist, they are primarily available through social media platforms. To our knowledge, there exists no clear outline of these resources. We identified 16 resources through a database search and through popular social media platforms. Nine out of 16 resources were video based, and 2 utilized the concept of spaced repetition through flashcards. Our review describes these educational resources and aims to serve as a guide for medical students interested in neurosurgery.

The Limited Utility of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score as a Frailty Assessment Tool in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is an International Classification of Disease 10th Revision-based scale that was originally designed for, and validated in, the assessment of patients 75 years or older presenting in an acute care setting. This study highlights central tenets inherent to the concept of frailty; questions the logic behind, and utility of, HFRS' recent implementation in the neurosurgical literature; and discusses why there is no useful role for HFRS as a frailty-based neurosurgical risk assessment (FBNRA) tool. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of the literature per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, including all cranial and spinal studies that used HFRS as their primary frailty tool. Seventeen (N = 17) studies used HFRS to assess frailty's impact on neurosurgical outcomes. Thirteen total journals, 10 of which were neurosurgical journals, including the highest impact factor journals, published the 17 papers. RESULTS: Increasing HFRS score was associated with adverse outcomes, including prolonged length of stay (11 of 17 studies), nonroutine discharge (10 of 17 studies), and increased hospital costs (9 of 17 studies). Four different HFRS studies, of the 17, predicted one of the following 4 adverse outcomes: worse quality of life, worse functional outcomes, reoperation, or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite its rapid acceptance and widespread proliferation through the leading neurosurgical journals, HFRS lacks any conceptual relationship to the frailty syndrome or FBNRA for individual patients. HFRS measures acute conditions using International Classification of Disease 10th Revision codes and awards "frailty" points for symptoms and examination findings unrelated to the impaired baseline physiological reserve inherent to the very definition of frailty. HFRS lacks clinical utility as it cannot be deployed point-of-care at the bedside to risk stratify patients. HFRS has never been validated in any patient population younger than 75 years or in any nonacute care setting. We recommend HFRS be discontinued as an individual FBNRA tool.

The frailty-driven predictive model for failure to rescue among patients who experienced a major complication following cervical decompression and fusion: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of 3,632 cases (2011-2020).

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Preoperative risk stratification for patients considering cervical decompression and fusion (CDF) relies on established independent risk factors to predict the probability of complications and outcomes in order to help guide pre and perioperative decision-making. PURPOSE: This study aims to determine frailty's impact on failure to rescue (FTR), or when a mortality occurs within 30 days following a major complication. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of retrospective and nationally-representative data. PATIENT SAMPLE: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all CDF cases from 2011-2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: CDF patients who experienced a major complication were identified and FTR was calculated as death or hospice disposition within 30 days of a major complication. METHODS: Frailty was measured by the Risk Analysis Index-Revised (RAI-Rev). Baseline patient demographics and characteristics were compared for all FTR patients. Significant factors were assessed by univariate and multivariable regression for the development of a frailty-driven predictive model for FTR. The discriminative ability of the predictive model was assessed using a receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: There were 3632 CDF patients who suffered a major complication and 7.6% (277 patients) subsequently expired or dispositioned to hospice, the definition of FTR. Independent predictors of FTR were nonelective surgery, frailty, preoperative intubation, thrombosis or embolic complication, unplanned intubation, on ventilator for >48 hours, cardiac arrest, and septic shock. Frailty, and a combination of preoperative and postoperative risk factors in a predictive model for FTR, achieved outstanding discriminatory accuracy (C-statistic = 0.901, CI: 0.883-0.919). CONCLUSION: Preoperative and postoperative risk factors, combined with frailty, yield a highly accurate predictive model for FTR in CDF patients. Our model may guide surgical management and/or prognostication regarding the likelihood of FTR after a major complication postoperatively with CDF patients. Future studies may determine the predictive ability of this model in other neurosurgical patient populations.