Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heliyon ; 10(11): e32567, 2024 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961963

RESUMO

Effective management of fertilizers is essential in influencing the prevalence of insects in rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields. Over two years (2019-20 and 2020-21), an experiment conducted at Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Habiganj, during the boro season aimed to identify the most effective multidimensional treatment (EMT) by testing various combinations of chemical fertilizers and its effect on rice insects. The goal was to optimize rice grain yield while minimizing harmful insect infestation and supporting natural enemies. Eight different chemical fertilizer applications were used as follows: T1 contained a full mix of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sulfur (S); T2 had PKS but lacked N; T3 had NKS but lacked P; T4 had NPS but lacked K; T5 had NPK but lacked S; T6 had KS but lacked N and P; T7 had PS but lacked N and K; and T8 lacked all four elements - N, P, K, and S. The relationship between the dynamics of harmful insects and natural enemies was highly positively correlated (r = 0.72 to 0.97). In two consecutive growing years, the 2020-21 season exhibited notably higher counts of harmful insects, with Rice Leafroller (RLR) dominating in the booting stage and White Backed Planthopper (WBPH) in mid-tillering, while Green Mirid Bug (GMB) prevailed among natural enemies across both stages, surpassing insect pest counts, notably GMB, Lady bird beetle (LBB), Carabid beetle (CDB), and Staphylinid (STD). However, the yield was notably higher in the 2019-20 growing season despite these pest pressures. Throughout the mid-tillering and booting stages, T1 consistently exhibited the highest average populations of harmful insects and natural enemies, while T7 demonstrated the lowest count of harmful insects, followed by T2 at both growth stages. Additionally, the highest grain yield (GY) was consistently recorded in T1, followed by T5, T6, and T3, with yields of 7.98 t/ha, 7.63 t/ha, 7.38 t/ha, and 7.33 t/ha, respectively. In both stages, beneficial insects prevailed over harmful ones in all fertilizer applications, with significant declines noted in T2 and T7. Factor analysis showed successful selection for EMT in the MGIDI index for all variables except INT and GY during the 2019-20 season, with selection differentials (SD) ranging from -0.10 to 8.29. However, in 2020-21, selection was achieved for all variables with SD ranging from 0.37 to 6.08. According to the MGIDI index, the top-ranked EMTs were identified as T4 and T3 for the 2019-20 period, and T3 and T5 for the 2020-21 period. The EMT shared in both years, T3, proved effective because of its positive impact on enhancing natural enemies throughout both periods (with SD ranging from 4.76 to 8.29 for 2019-20 and 3.03 to 6.08 for 2020-21), and its notable contribution to rice grain yield (SD = 0.37) in 2020-21. This study uniquely integrates EMT to optimize rice grain yield while simultaneously managing harmful insect infestations and supporting natural enemies, addressing a critical need in sustainable rice cultivation. The suggestion is to give preference to fertilizer application T3, which omits P but contains N and K, to improve rice grain yield and boost natural enemies, thereby reducing harmful insect infestation. Moreover, future investigations should concentrate on refining fertilizer blends to strike a harmony between maximizing yield and fostering ecological robustness in rice cultivation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...