RESUMO
Background: Exercise improves the physical function of people suffering from chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis (HD). Virtual reality is a new type of intradialysis exercise that has a positive impact on physical function. Intradialysis exercise is recommended during the first 2 h, but its safety in the last part of the dialysis session is unknown. Methods: This was a pilot sub-study of a clinical trial. Several hemodynamic control variables were recorded, including blood pressure, heart rate, and intradialytic hypotensive events. These variables were recorded during three different HD sessions, one HD session at rest, another HD session with exercise during the first two hours, and one HD session with exercise during the last 30 min of dialysis. The intradialysis virtual reality exercise was performed for a maximum of 30 min. Results: During exercise sessions, there was a significant increase in heart rate (6.65 (4.92, 8.39) bpm; p < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (6.25 (0.04,12.47) mmHg; p < 0.05). There was no difference in hemodynamic control between the sessions with exercise during the first two hours and the sessions with exercise during the last 30 min. There was no association between intra-dialytic hypotensive events at rest (five events) or exercise at any point (two vs. one event(s), respectively). Conclusion: performing exercise with virtual reality at the end of a hemodialysis session is not associated with hemodynamic instability.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The determination of Kt/V by ionic dialysance is a technique that has extended its use in hemodialysis clinics. The clinical guidelines have reflected the need to validate this method as a determinant of the dose of dialysis. OBJECTIVES: Determine in daily practice, the influence of hemodialysis characteristics and medication on Kt/V results by ionic dialysance (Kt/V OCM) and compare them with Kt/V measures by serum urea (Kt/V Daugirdas). DESIGN: Cross-sectional and observational study. PARTICIPANTS: 127 patients on chronic hemodialysis. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive variables, study variables (Kt/VOCM, Kt/VDaugidas), and the variables that modified the effect (patient temperature, serum sodium, vascular access, recirculation, blood flow, hemodialysis technique, dialyzer, acid concentrate, conductivity, dialyzate flow). RESULTS: The mean of Kt/V Daugirdas was 1.84 and the Kt/VOCM mean 1.65; Pearson's was CC r=0.54; P<0.001 and Lin CCC=0.48. In the linear regression, the variables related to hemodialysis technique showed no statistical association with the measurement obtained by Kt/VOCM. Monosodium phosphate and 20% sodium chloride dispensing were associated with a higher Kt/VOCM. CONCLUSIONS: The different technical aspects noted during HD sessions do not influence Kt/V OCM outcomes. Kt/V determined by ionic dialysance isn't similar to that determined by serum urea. When assessing dialysis doses measured by dialysance, consider that it is not the same as determined with serum urea, but it provides an approximation to estimate dialysis doses in real time. It is necessary to consider if drugs or supplements have been administered that can modify it when interpreting the results.
Assuntos
Diálise Renal , Ureia , Estudos Transversais , Soluções para Diálise , Humanos , ÍonsRESUMO
Renal replacement treatment has not been generalized to the elderly for different reasons. The main objective of the present cohort study is to compare survival in patients older than 80 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on renal replacement treatment with those on conservative treatment. The use of healthcare resources is compared too. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was run with the outcome variable death during the follow-up period. The independent variables were treatment type, age, gender, smoking habit, serum albumin, hemoglobin, Charlson Index, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, ischemic cardiopathy, and neoplasm. For outcome variable "death," renal replacement treatment obtained a hazard ratio of 0.273 (P .006, CI95% 0.108-0.686) vs conservative treatment. In conclusion, patients older than 80 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on renal replacement treatment presented a lower mortality risk than those receiving conservative treatment. Comorbidity and age are both associated with mortality, but do not cancel out the survival advantage. In healthcare resources, the renal replacement treatment group made greater use of tests, medical visits and consumption of hospital dispensing drugs, but there were no differences with respect to the days of hospital admission or assistance in home hospitalization.
Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
It has been suggested that physical exercise in chronic hemodialysis could improve dialysis dose and reduce postdialysis rebound. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare a group of patients doing physical exercise during the first 2 h of hemodialysis sessions and another group doing physical exercise at home. The descriptive variables, dialysis doses measured by KtV, and rebounds (urea, creatinine, potassium, phosphorus), were recorded. For 69 patients: the mean KtV was 1.84; the 30-min rebound of creatinine was 32.37%, urea 24.39%, potassium 15.31%, and phosphorus 51.29%. For each patient, the basal measurement was compared with those determined when performing physical exercise; no statistically significant differences were observed between the changes determined to dose and rebound in the group with hemodialysis exercise compared to those of the home exercise group. In conclusion, performing physical exercise during the first 2 hours of hemodialysis sessions neither lowered postdialysis molecules rebound nor improved dialysis dose.
