Role of capsule endoscopy in alarm features and non-responsive celiac disease: A European multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The role of capsule endoscopy (CE) in established celiac disease (CD) remains unclear. Our objective was to analyze the usefulness of CE in the suspicion of complicated CD. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study. One hundred and eighty-nine celiac patients (mean age: 46.6 ± 16.6, 30.2% males) who underwent CE for alarm symptoms (n = 86, 45.5%) or non-responsive CD (n = 103, 54.5%) were included. Diagnostic yield (DY), therapeutic impact and safety were analyzed. RESULTS: Capsule endoscopy was completed in 95.2% of patients (small bowel transit time: 270.5 ± 100.2 min). Global DY was 67.2%, detecting atrophic mucosa (n = 92, 48.7%), ulcerative jejunoileitis (n = 21, 11.1%), intestinal lymphoma (n = 7, 3.7%) and other enteropathies (n = 7, 3.7%, six Crohn's disease cases and one neuroendocrine tumor). The DY of CE was significantly higher in patients presenting with non-responsive disease compared to patients with alarm symptoms (73.8% vs 59.3%, P = 0.035). The new findings of the CE modified management in 59.3% of the cases. There were no major complications. CONCLUSION: Capsule endoscopy may be a moderately helpful and safe diagnostic tool in the suspicion of complicated CD, modifying the clinical course of these patients.

Role of capsule endoscopy in suspected celiac disease: A European multi-centre study.

AIM: To analyze the diagnostic yield (DY), therapeutic impact (TI) and safety of capsule endoscopy (CE). METHODS: This is a multi-centre, observational, analytical, retrospective study. A total of 163 patients with suspicion of celiac disease (CD) (mean age = 46.4 ± 17.3 years, 68.1% women) who underwent CE from 2003 to 2015 were included. Patients were divided into four groups: seronegative CD with atrophy (Group-I, n = 19), seropositive CD without atrophy (Group-II, n = 39), contraindication to gastroscopy (Group-III, n = 6), seronegative CD without atrophy, but with a compatible context (Group-IV, n = 99). DY, TI and the safety of CE were analysed. RESULTS: The overall DY was 54% and the final diagnosis was villous atrophy (n = 65, 39.9%), complicated CD (n = 12, 7.4%) and other enteropathies (n = 11, 6.8%; 8 Crohn's). DY for groups I to IV was 73.7%, 69.2%, 50% and 44.4%, respectively. Atrophy was located in duodenum in 24 cases (36.9%), diffuse in 19 (29.2%), jejunal in 11 (16.9%), and patchy in 10 cases (15.4%). Factors associated with a greater DY were positive serology (68.3% vs 49.2%, P = 0.034) and older age (P = 0.008). On the other hand, neither sex nor clinical presentation, family background, positive histology or HLA status were associated with DY. CE results changed the therapeutic approach in 71.8% of the cases. Atrophy was associated with a greater TI (92.3% vs 45.3%, P < 0.001) and 81.9% of the patients responded to diet. There was one case of capsule retention (0.6%). Agreement between CE findings and subsequent histology was 100% for diagnosing normal/other conditions, 70% for suspected CD and 50% for complicated CD. CONCLUSION: CE has a high DY in cases of suspicion of CD and it leads to changes in the clinical course of the disease. CE is safe procedure with a high degree of concordance with histology and it helps in the differential diagnosis of CD.

Tratamiento percutáneo del carcinoma hepatocelular en pacientes con edad avanzada en la práctica clínica / Percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in older patients in clinical practice

INTRODUCCIÓN: Existe un alto porcentaje de pacientes con carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC) en estadio precoz con edad avanzada, que son potenciales candidatos a tratamiento percutáneo. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Evaluamos prospectivamente los datos de pacientes con CHC mayores de 70 años. Describimos sus características y el tratamiento pautado, así como la respuesta, las complicaciones y la supervivencia de los tratados con radiofrecuencia (RF) y/o inyección percutánea de alcohol (IPA). RESULTADOS: De los 194 pacientes con CHC, 84 eran mayores de 70 años (43,3%). La edad media era 76,8 ± 4,5 años. El 75% eran varones. El 91,7% eran cirróticos. El 61,9% se descubrió por cribado. Se diagnosticaron en estadio precoz (0-A) de Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer el 60,7%, en B, el 19%, en C, el 12%, y en D, el 8,3%. El 38,2% recibió tratamiento potencialmente curativo (4,8% resección, 22,6% IPA, 4,8% RF, 6% IPA + RF), el 20,2%, quimioembolización, el 3,6%, sorafenib, el 25% no fue candidato a tratamiento, y el 13% rechazó el tratamiento recomendado. La mediana de seguimiento desde que recibieron el tratamiento percutáneo fue de 23 (IIC 14,2-40,6) meses. La media del número de sesiones de IPA fue de 3,5 ± 2,2 y de RF 1,8 ± 1,6. Hubo un 4% de complicaciones por sesión. Permanecieron en remisión el 35,7%. La mediana de supervivencia fue de 45,7 meses (IC 95% 20,8-70,6). CONCLUSIONES: El 43,3% de nuestros pacientes con CHC tenían una edad avanzada. Más de la mitad se diagnosticaron en estadio precoz. En un tercio se realizó tratamiento percutáneo, con un 35,7% de remisión y complicaciones poco frecuentes. Por lo tanto, este tipo de pacientes deben evaluarse para tratamiento percutáneo

INTRODUCTION: A high percentage of older patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are potential candidates for percutaneous ablation.Material and methods We prospectively assessed data from patients older than 70 years with HCC. We determined their demographic and clinical characteristics, the treatment provided and the response, complications and survival among those treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and/or percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI). RESULTS: Of 194 patients with HCC, 84 were older than 70 years (43.3%). The mean age was 76.8 ± 4.5 years. Seventy-five percent were male and 91.7% had cirrhosis. Cancer was initially identified by a surveillance program in 61.9%. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, 60.7% were classified as having early stage cancer (0-A), 19% as stage B, 12% as stage C, and 8.3% as stage D. Potentially curative initial treatment was provided in 38.2% (surgical resection in 4.8%, PEI in 22.6%, RFA in 4.8%, PEI + RFA in 6%), transarterial chemoembolization in 20.2%, and sorafenib in 3.6%. Twenty-five percent of patients were not treatment candidates and 13% refused the recommended treatment. The median follow-up after percutaneous ablation was 23 months (IQR 14.2-40.6). The mean number of sessions was 3.5 ± 2.2 for PEI and 1.8 ± 1.6 for RFA. The complications rate per session was 4%. Remission was achieved in 35.7%. The overall median survival was 45.7 months (95% CI 20.8-70.6). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the patients with HCC in our sample were elderly and more than half were diagnosed at an early stage. Percutaneous ablation was performed in one-third of the sample, achieving remission in 37.5%. There were few complications. Therefore, these patients should be assessed for percutaneous ablation

[Percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in older patients in clinical practice]. / Tratamiento percutáneo del carcinoma hepatocelular en pacientes con edad avanzada en la práctica clínica.

INTRODUCTION: A high percentage of older patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are potential candidates for percutaneous ablation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively assessed data from patients older than 70 years with HCC. We determined their demographic and clinical characteristics, the treatment provided and the response, complications and survival among those treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and/or percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI). RESULTS: Of 194 patients with HCC, 84 were older than 70 years (43.3%). The mean age was 76.8 ± 4.5 years. Seventy-five percent were male and 91.7% had cirrhosis. Cancer was initially identified by a surveillance program in 61.9%. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, 60.7% were classified as having early stage cancer (0-A), 19% as stage B, 12% as stage C, and 8.3% as stage D. Potentially curative initial treatment was provided in 38.2% (surgical resection in 4.8%, PEI in 22.6%, RFA in 4.8%, PEI+RFA in 6%), transarterial chemoembolization in 20.2%, and sorafenib in 3.6%. Twenty-five percent of patients were not treatment candidates and 13% refused the recommended treatment. The median follow-up after percutaneous ablation was 23 months (IQR 14.2-40.6). The mean number of sessions was 3.5 ± 2.2 for PEI and 1.8 ± 1.6 for RFA. The complications rate per session was 4%. Remission was achieved in 35.7%. The overall median survival was 45.7 months (95% CI 20.8-70.6). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the patients with HCC in our sample were elderly and more than half were diagnosed at an early stage. Percutaneous ablation was performed in one-third of the sample, achieving remission in 37.5%. There were few complications. Therefore, these patients should be assessed for percutaneous ablation.