Factors Related to Expectations in Individuals Waiting for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Purpose: There is no consensus on how age and expectations influence planning for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study developed and evaluated a new expectation questionnaire and assessed the relationship between preoperative expectations and patient characteristics. Method: The questionnaire evaluated expectations for mobility, pain, participation, and rate of recovery after surgery. Fifty-five participants completed a 6-minute walk test and expectation questionnaire prior to TKA; 17 participants repeated the questionnaire one week later for reliability testing. Analysis of the questionnaire included intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), homoscedasticity, skewness, kurtosis, multicollinearity, and descriptive measures. A four-step hierarchical linear regression was completed to determine the relationship of patient age, BMI, previous contralateral TKA, and 6-minute walk test scores to expectations. Results: The questionnaire showed good/high test-retest reliability (ICC 0.84; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.94; p > 0.001). The final model was significant in predicting expectation scores R2 = 0.19 (p = 0.017). Conclusions: This questionnaire reliably measures patient expectations before TKA; however, further research is needed. Although we anticipated younger age to be related to higher expectations, higher function prior to TKA appears to be more strongly associated with higher expectations.

Objectif: il n'y a pas de consensus quant à l'influence de l'âge et des attentes sur la planification d'une arthroplastie totale du genou (ATG). La présente étude a porté sur l'élaboration et l'évaluation d'un nouveau questionnaire des attentes et a évalué le lien entre les attentes préopératoires et les caractéristiques des patients. Méthodologie: le questionnaire évaluait les attentes en matière de mobilité, de douleur, de participation et de taux de rétablissement après l'opération. Au total, 55 patients ont effectué un test de marche de six minutes et ont rempli un questionnaire sur leurs attentes avant l'ATG; 17 participants ont rempli de nouveau le questionnaire une semaine plus tard en vue d'un test de fiabilité. L'analyse du questionnaire incluait le coefficient de corrélation intraclasse (CCI), l'homoscédasticité, l'asymétrie, la multicolinéarité et des mesures descriptives. Une régression linéaire hiérarchique en quatre étapes a permis de déterminer la relation entre, d'une part, l'âge des patients, leur indice de masse corporelle, leur ATG contralatérale antérieure et les scores de marche de six minutes et, d'autre part, les attentes. Résultats: le questionnaire avait une fiabilité test-retest bonne à élevée (CCI de 0,84, IC à 95 % de 0,57 à 0,94; p > 0,001). Le modèle définitif pouvait prédire de manière significative les scores d'attentes de R2 = 0,19 (p = 0,017). Conclusions: le présent questionnaire mesure avec fiabilité les attentes des patients avant l'ATG, mais d'autres recherches s'imposent. Les chercheurs croyaient qu'un plus jeune âge serait associé à des attentes plus élevées, mais un meilleur fonctionnement avant l'ATG semblait être lié davantage à des hautes attentes.

Falling risk in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis.

Although 25% of patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) have reported a fall, there is limited information about risk factors for falling in patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and functional measures related to fall risk. A total of 259 participants awaiting TKA for OA participated in this secondary cross-sectional study. Participants were divided into fallers and non-fallers based on falling history in the prior 6 months. Clinical measures (hip and knee pain, neck and low back pain (LBP), knee range of motion, and quadriceps strength) and functional measures (six-minute walk test (6MWT), timed up and go test, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)) were assessed in patients 2-4 weeks prior to TKA. Independent t tests were used to examine differences between groups. Odds ratio was calculated to identify clinical risk factors for falling. Of all participants, 47 (18%) reported a fall in the previous 6 months. Fallers had 30% greater LBP (3.0 ± 2.5 vs. 2.1 ± 2.6; p = 0.025). Fallers walked 12% shorter distance in the 6MWT than non-fallers (378 ± 100 vs. 422 ± 105 m; p = 0.010). For every 1-point increase in LBP on a 0-10 scale, there was a 14% greater risk of falling (p = 0.028). For every 10-m increase in 6MWT, there was a 3.8% reduction in fall risk (p = 0.011). Greater LBP and worse walking endurance are associated with falls in individuals with end-stage OA. Future studies should determine if interventions that reduce LBP and improve walking performance also reduce the chance of falling.

The effect of surgical approach on gait mechanics after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the biomechanical outcomes of different surgical approaches for hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare hip, pelvic, and trunk kinematics and kinetics between individuals who underwent a posterior or anterolateral approach. METHODS: Forty-five individuals between 40 and 80 years old underwent motion analysis during overground gait prior to hip arthroplasty and 3 months after surgery. Walking speed, hip flexion angle, hip extension angle, adduction angle and moment, trunk angle, trunk lean, and pelvis drop were compared between approaches. FINDINGS: There were 30 subjects in the posterior group and 15 subjects in the anterolateral group. The groups did not change differently over time as there were no significant interaction effects. However, there were main effects for time; walking speed increased 19.9% (p < .001), hip flexion angle increased 3.3 degrees (p = 0.014) and peak hip extension increased 4.5 degrees (p = .001), and peak hip adduction significantly increased 1.9 degrees (p = .004) for the sample as a whole. Trunk angle (p = .283) and trunk lean (p = .401) did not significantly change between time points, but there was a significant increase in pelvic drop (p = .003). INTERPRETATION: Surgical approach did not affect biomechanical outcomes 3 months after arthroplasty. Both groups showed improvement in sagittal plane hip kinetics and kinematics. However, increased pelvic drop may be indicative of residual hip weakness in both groups.

The Effect of Surgical Approach on Strength and Function after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become standard procedure to manag the symptoms of end-stage osteoarthritis (OA), there are multiple surgical approaches to acceE the hip joint. To date, there is limited information on the effect of surgical approach on muscle strength and performance-based measures of functional ability after THA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of posterior or anterolateral surgical approaches on strength and function after THA. We hypothesized that individuals who underwent a posterior approach would have greater strength and performance-based measures of function than individuals who underwent an anterolateral approach one year after surgery. We also hypothesized that there would be no difference in pain or self-reported outcomes at follow-up. METHODS: 63 subjects were tested two to four weeks prior to THA and then three months and 12 months after THA. Subjects were divided into a posterior approach and lateral approac groups. Patients completed functional testing, strength measures, as well as self-reported questionnaires at each time point. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed to test the change between the pre-operative and one year time point. Descriptive data were reported for all three time points. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction effect for hip abduction strength (p=0.025) and the lateral group was significantly weaker at one year (p=0.018). No other variable demonstrated a significant interaction effect; however, all other variables with the exception of hip abductor strength (p=0.883) and pain on the non-operated side (p=0.527) demonstrated a significant main effect of time (p≤0.01) in which there was significant improvement at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The lateral surgical approaches result in weaker hip abduction one year after THA; however significant and clinically meaningful improvements in functional ability were seen for most subiects. regardless of surgical approach.

Sit-To-Stand Biomechanics Before and After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in movement patterns during a sit-to-stand (STS) task before and after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to compare biomechanical outcomes after THA to a control group. Forty-five subjects who underwent THA and twenty-three healthy control subjects participated in three-dimensional motion analysis. Pre-operatively, subjects exhibited inter-limb movement asymmetries with lower vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) and smaller moments on the operated limb. Although there were significant improvements in movement symmetry 3 months after THA, patients continued to demonstrate lower VGRF and smaller moments on the operated limb compared to non-operated and to control limbs. Future studies should identify the contributions of physical impairments and the influence of surgical approach on STS biomechanics.

Effect of preoperative exercise on measures of functional status in men and women undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a short preoperative exercise intervention on the functional status, pain, and muscle strength of patients before and after total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: A total of 108 men and women scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomized to a 6-week exercise or education (control) intervention immediately prior to surgery. We assessed outcomes through questionnaires and performance measures. Analyses examined differences between groups over the preoperative and immediate postoperative periods and at 8 and 26 weeks postsurgery. RESULTS: Among THA patients, the exercise intervention was associated with improvements in preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function score (improvement of 2.2 in exercisers versus decline of 3.9 in controls; P = 0.02) and Short Form 36 physical function score (decline of 0.4 in exercisers versus decline of 14.3 in controls; P = 0.003). No significant differences were seen in TKA patients. Exercise participation increased muscle strength preoperatively (18% in THA patients and 20% in TKA patients), whereas the control patients had essentially no change in strength (P > 0.05 for exercise versus education in both THA and TKA groups). Exercise participation prior to total joint arthroplasty substantially reduced the risk of discharge to a rehabilitation facility in THA and TKA patients (adjusted odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.074-0.998). The intervention had no effects on outcomes 8 and 26 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSION: A 6-week presurgical exercise program can safely improve preoperative functional status and muscle strength levels in persons undergoing THA. Additionally, exercise participation prior to total joint arthroplasty dramatically reduces the odds of inpatient rehabilitation.