Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic performance of CNSide™ versus standard cytology for leptomeningeal disease.

Background: This retrospective study compares the real-world performance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) CNSide™ versus cytology in leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected LMD who underwent lumbar punctures for CSF cytology and CNSide™ from January 2020 to December 2022 were reviewed. LMD was classified by EANO criteria. Descriptive statistics, confusion matrix, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional regression were used. Results: Median age for 87 evaluable patients was 63 years (range: 23-93); 82 (94%) met EANO criteria for possible/probable/confirmed LMD (EANO/LMD). The commonest primary cancers were breast (36,44.0%) and lung (34,41.5%). Primary lung harbored actionable mutations in 18 (53.0%); primary breast expressed hormone receptors in 27 (75%), and HER2 amplification in 8 (22%). Uncontrolled systemic disease was detected in 35 (40%), while 25 (46%) received systemic therapy with medium/high CNS penetrance at LMD diagnosis. The median time from initial cancer to LMD diagnosis was 31 months (range: 13-73). LMD was confirmed by CSF cytology in 23/82 (28%), all identified by CNSide™. CNSide™ identified 13 additional cases (36/82, 43.9%), increasing diagnostic yield by 56.5%. Median overall survival (mOS) was 31 weeks (95%CI: 21-43), significantly worse for CNSide™ positive versus negative: 4.0 versus 16.0 weeks, respectively (HR = 0.50, P = .010). While survival since LMD diagnosis did not differ by histology, time to LMD diagnosis from initial cancer diagnosis was longer for breast (48.5 months, IQR: 30.0-87.5) versus lung (8 months, IQR:0.5-16.0) cohorts. mOS was longer for patients eligible for intrathecal chemotherapy (HR: 0.189, 95%CI: 0.053-0.672, P = .010). Conclusions: This retrospective, real-world analysis of CNSide™ showed increased sensitivity versus cytology and provided clinically relevant molecular CSF analyses.

Burden of cardiovascular disease on coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalizations in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risk factors have increased rates of adverse events and mortality after hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we attempted to identify and assess the effects of CVD on COVID-19 hospitalizations in the USA using a large national database. METHODS: The current study was a retrospective analysis of data from the US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from 2020. All adult patients 18 years of age and older who were admitted with the primary diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included prolonged hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation, and disposition other than home. Prolonged hospital length of stay was defined as a length of stay greater than the 75th percentile for the full sample. The diagnoses were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. RESULTS: A total of 1 050 040 patients were included in the study, of which 454 650 (43.3%) had prior CVD. Patients with CVD had higher mortality during COVID-19 hospitalization (19.3 vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001). Similarly, these patients had a higher rate of prolonged hospital length of stay (34.5 vs. 21.0%, P < 0.001), required mechanical ventilation (15.4 vs. 5.6%, P < 0.001), and were more likely to be discharged to a disposition other than home (62.5 vs. 32.3%, P < 0.001). Mean hospitalization cost was also higher in patients with CVD during hospitalization ($24 023 vs. $15 320, P < 0.001). Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR), 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.91-3.45] were significantly higher for COVID-19 hospitalizations with CVD, compared with those without CVD. Similarly, prolonged hospital length (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.43-2.23), mechanical ventilation (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 3.06-3.67), and disposition other than home (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.87-2.21) were also significantly higher for COVID-19 hospitalizations with coronary artery disease. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the presence of CVD has a significant negative impact on the prognosis of patients hospitalized for COVID-19. There was an associated increase in mortality, length of stay, ventilator use, and adverse discharge dispositions among COVID-19 patients with CVD. Adjustment in treatment for CVD should be considered when providing care to patients hospitalized for COVID-19 to mitigate some of the adverse hospital outcomes.

Integrative Bioinformatics-Gene Network Approach Reveals Linkage between Estrogenic Endocrine Disruptors and Vascular Remodeling in Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Vascular diseases, including peripheral arterial disease (PAD), pulmonary arterial hypertension, and atherosclerosis, significantly impact global health due to their intricate relationship with vascular remodeling. This process, characterized by structural alterations in resistance vessels, is a hallmark of heightened vascular resistance seen in these disorders. The influence of environmental estrogenic endocrine disruptors (EEDs) on the vasculature suggests a potential exacerbation of these alterations. Our study employs an integrative approach, combining data mining with bioinformatics, to unravel the interactions between EEDs and vascular remodeling genes in the context of PAD. We explore the molecular dynamics by which EED exposure may alter vascular function in PAD patients. The investigation highlights the profound effect of EEDs on pivotal genes such as ID3, LY6E, FOS, PTP4A1, NAMPT, GADD45A, PDGF-BB, and NFKB, all of which play significant roles in PAD pathophysiology. The insights gained from our study enhance the understanding of genomic alterations induced by EEDs in vascular remodeling processes. Such knowledge is invaluable for developing strategies to prevent and manage vascular diseases, potentially mitigating the impact of harmful environmental pollutants like EEDs on conditions such as PAD.

Dose-Escalated Preoperative Proton Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Initial Outcomes of a New Treatment Paradigm.

Purpose: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) have varied treatment practices with regard to the use of radiation therapy (RT). Preoperative RT ∼50 Gy is commonly used, but the Surgery With or Without Radiation Therapy in Untreated Nonmetastatic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (STRASS-1) randomized trial demonstrated no improvement in abdominal recurrence-free survival with preoperative RT. Dose escalation has been proposed to improve the efficacy of preoperative RT. We analyzed RPS treated with preoperative intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to an escalated dose of 63 Gy at a single institution. Methods and Materials: Patients who received preoperative RT with IMPT with RPS between January 2015 and October 2021 were reviewed. IMPT 63 Gy in 28 fractions to the clinical target volume high-risk and 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to clinical target volume low-risk was used. Patient baseline characteristics, RT dose parameters, toxicities, margin status, and recurrence patterns were recorded. Local control was computed by Fine-Gray analysis and overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Sixteen patients met the study criteria (n = 16): 12 primary and 4 isolated local recurrences. Median age was 62 years (IQR, 43.5-66 years) and 62.5% were male; 10 were liposarcoma. The median maximum tumor diameter was 19.9 cm (IQR, 12-24 cm). With a median follow-up of 18 months (IQR, 11.5-37 months), the estimated 3-year freedom from local failure rate was 68.2% (95% CI, 41.7%-94.7%); 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 68.8% (95% CI, 41.9%-95.8%). No Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥3 acute or late toxicities were noted. Conclusions: In our RPS cohort, preoperative dose-escalated RT to 63 Gy demonstrated comparable local control without G3 acute toxicities. Given the high local recurrence rates of RPS, this approach warrants further study to validate these results and identify patients most likely to benefit from therapy.

Gender Differences in Hospital Outcomes among COVID-19 Hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVES: Many epidemiological studies have shown that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disproportionately affects males, compared with females, although other studies show that there were no such differences. The aim of the present study was to assess differences in the prevalence of hospitalizations and in-hospital outcomes between the sexes, using a larger administrative database. METHODS: We used the 2020 California State Inpatient Database for this retrospective analysis. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code U07.1 was used to identify COVID-19 hospitalizations. These hospitalizations were subsequently stratified by male and female sex. Diagnosis and procedures were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The primary outcome of the study was hospitalization rate, and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: There were 95,180 COVID-19 hospitalizations among patients 18 years and older, 52,465 (55.1%) of which were among men and 42,715 (44.9%) were among women. In-hospital mortality (12.4% vs 10.1%), prolonged length of hospital stays (30.6% vs 25.8%), vasopressor use (2.6% vs 1.6%), mechanical ventilation (11.8% vs 8.0%), and ICU admission rates (11.4% versus 7.8%) were significantly higher among male compared with female hospitalizations. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-1.44), hospital lengths of stay (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.31-1.39), vasopressor use (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.51-1.66), mechanical ventilation (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.47-1.78), and ICU admission rates (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.51-1.66) were significantly higher among male hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that male sex is an independent and strong risk factor associated with COVID-19 severity.

Development of a Cancer Rehabilitation Dashboard to Collect Data on Physical Function in Cancer Patients and Survivors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to describe the development of a cancer rehabilitation dashboard that collects data on physical function for cancer survivors in a cancer institute. METHODS: This project was conducted at the Miami Cancer Institute. The cancer rehabilitation dashboard was developed by a team of physicians, biostatistician, and medical informatics teams to record, report and track the physical function of cancer survivors. A multimodal approach to the measurement of physical function was used and included the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function short form, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Fatigue short form, Timed Up and Go Test, Sit-to-Stand Test in 30-sec test, four-stage balance test, and grip strength. To develop this system, a Cerner Power Form was developed based on the physical function data. To display the data, a dedicated flowsheet was developed and placed within the Oncology Viewpoint in Cerner Millennium. Thus, from inside any patient record, the flowsheet could easily be accessed by providers without leaving normal clinician workflows. Using native functionality, the data can also be shown in graphical format to facilitate dialog with patients and oncology teams. All patient data from the Cerner Power Form discrete task assays were integrated into an existing Oncology Data Warehouse for all patients. The data elements in the Cerner Power Form were identified in the electronic medical record system, loaded into the Oncology Data Warehouse, and related to the other source systems to develop reports and data visualizations such as the cancer rehabilitation dashboard. The cancer rehabilitation dashboard allows visualization of numerous parameters of physical function in cancer survivors evaluated and treated and their change over time. Rendered in Tableau, the cancer rehabilitation dashboard acts as a centralized, interactive data source to analyze and connect clinicians to near real-time data. RESULTS: The cancer rehabilitation dashboard was successfully developed and implemented into a cancer rehabilitation practice in a cancer institute and used to collect and track physical function data for cancer survivors receiving treatment and cancer survivors. This information has been used to direct the treatment plan and educate individual patients about the impact of the cancer and its treatment on physical function as well as oncology teams in a cancer institute. CONCLUSIONS: The cancer rehabilitation dashboard provides an insight into the physical function of cancer survivors receiving treatment and cancer survivors using both self-reported and objective metrics. It can be customized to suit the interests of clinicians and researchers wishing to improve the quality of life of this population.

Prophylactic Radiotherapy Of MInimally Symptomatic Spinal Disease (PROMISSeD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Early palliative/pre-emptive intervention improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with metastatic cancer. A previous signal-seeking randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that early upfront radiotherapy to asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic high-risk osseous metastases led to reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs), a benefit driven primarily by subgroup of high-risk spine metastasis. The current RCT aims to determine whether early palliative/pre-emptive radiotherapy in patients with high-risk, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic spine metastases will lead to fewer SREs within 1 year. METHODS: This is a single-center, parallel-arm, in-progress RCT in adults (≥ 18 years) with ECOG performance status 0-2 and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic (not requiring opioids) high-risk spine metastases from histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancies with > 5 sites of metastatic disease on cross-sectional imaging. High-risk spine metastases are defined by the following: (a) bulkiest disease sites ≥ 2 cm; (b) junctional disease (occiput to C2, C7-T1, T12-L2, L5-S1); (c) posterior element involvement; or (d) vertebral body compression deformity > 50%. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 1) or upfront, early radiotherapy to ≤ 5 high-risk spine lesions plus standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 2), in the form of 20-30 Gy of radiation in 2-10 fractions. The primary endpoint is SRE, a composite outcome including spinal fracture, spinal cord compression, need for palliative radiotherapy, interventional procedures, or spinal surgery. Secondary endpoints include (1) surrogates of health care cost, including the number and duration of SRE-related hospitalizations; (2) overall survival; (3) pain-free survival; and (4) quality of life. Study instruments will be captured pre-treatment, at baseline, during treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. The trial aims to accrue 74 patients over 2 years to achieve > 80% power in detecting difference using two-sample proportion test with alpha < 0.05. DISCUSSION: The results of this RCT will demonstrate the value, if any, of early radiotherapy for high-risk spine metastases. The trial has received IRB approval, funding, and prospective registration (NCT05534321) and has been open to accrual since August 19, 2022. If positive, the trial will expand the scope and utility of spine radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05534321 . Registered September 9, 2022. TRIAL STATUS: Version 2.0 of the protocol (2021-KOT-002), revised last on September 2, 2022, was approved by the WCG institutional review board (Study Number 1337188, IRB tracking number 20223735). The trial was first posted on ClinicalTrials.Gov on September 9, 2022 (NCT05534321). Patient enrollment commenced on August 19, 2022, and is expected to be completed in 2 years, likely by August 2024.

The impact of COVID-19 on patients diagnosed with melanoma, breast, and colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare resource allocation and utilization of preventative medical services. It is unknown if there is resultant stage migration of melanoma, breast, and colorectal cancer when comparing extended time periods before and after the pandemic onset. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of melanoma, breast, and colorectal cancer patients was completed. Clinical and pathological staging was compared utilizing 12 and 22-month timeframes before and after the pandemic outbreak. RESULTS: Between the 22-month pre- and post-COVID-19 groups, breast cancer clinical stage T2 significantly increased, and pathological stage 2 decreased. Colorectal cancer clinical stage T1 decreased, stage T4 increased, and stage 0 decreased in the 22-month groups. In the 12-month groups, melanoma clinical stage T1 increased, and colorectal cancer clinical stage N2 increased. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating extended timeframes beyond the immediate pre- and post-COVID-19 period revealed significant increases in clinical staging of breast and colorectal cancer, suggesting advanced disease is becoming more evident as time progresses.

Hospital Outcomes in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension With Atrial Fibrillation in the United States.

In this study, using a large database, we examined the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and in-hospital mortality and other adverse hospital outcomes. This study was a retrospective analysis of the United States National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2014. All hospitalizations for patients diagnosed with primary PH and over the age of 65 years were included and then grouped based on the presence AF. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality rate, hospital length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Weighted regression analyses were performed to find the association between AF and outcomes. Of the 5,428,332 hospitalizations with PH, 2,531,075 (46.6%) had concomitant AF. The Cox proportional regression analysis showed that in patients with PE, all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.35, confidence interval [CI] 1.15 to 1.55) was significantly higher in patients with AF than those without AF. In addition, PH hospitalizations with AF had a longer hospital length of stay (ß coefficient 1.74, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.83) and higher hospitalization cost (ß coefficient 1.33, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.42). In patients aged over 65 years admitted for PH, the presence of AF was very frequent and worsened the prognosis. In conclusion, to improve patient outcomes and decrease hospital burden, it is important to consider AF during risk stratification for patients with PH to provide timely and prompt interventions. An interdisciplinary approach to treatment should be used to account for the burden of co-morbidities in this population.

Prevalence and effects of acute myocardial infarction on hospital outcomes among COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most lethal complications of COVID-19 hospitalization. In this study, we looked for the occurrence of AMI and its effects on hospital outcomes among COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Data from the 2020 California State Inpatient Database was used retrospectively. All COVID-19 hospitalizations with age ≥ 18 years were included in the analyses. Adverse hospital outcomes included in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS), vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission. Prolonged LOS was defined as any hospital LOS ≥ 75th percentile. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to understand the strength of associations after adjusting for cofactors. RESULTS: Our analysis had 94 114 COVID-19 hospitalizations, and 1548 (1.6%) had AMI. Mortality (43.2% vs. 10.8%, P  < 0.001), prolonged LOS (39.9% vs. 28.2%, P  < 0.001), vasopressor use (7.8% vs. 2.1%, P  < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (35.0% vs. 9.7%, P  < 0.001), and ICU admission (33.0% vs. 9.4%, P  < 0.001) were significantly higher among COVID-19 hospitalizations with AMI. The odds of adverse outcomes such as mortality (aOR 3.90, 95% CI: 3.48-4.36), prolonged LOS (aOR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.10-1.37), vasopressor use (aOR 3.71, 95% CI: 3.30-4.17), mechanical ventilation (aOR 2.71, 95% CI: 2.21-3.32), and ICU admission (aOR 3.51, 95% CI: 3.12-3.96) were significantly more among COVID-19 hospitalizations with AMI. CONCLUSION: Despite the very low prevalence of AMI among COVID-19 hospitalizations, the study showed a substantially greater risk of adverse hospital outcomes and mortality. COVID-19 patients with AMI should be aggressively treated to improve hospital outcomes.

Racial difference in mortality among COVID-19 hospitalizations in California.

In the US, racial disparities in hospital outcomes are well documented. We explored whether race was associated with all-cause in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission among COVID-19 patients in California. This was a retrospective analysis of California State Inpatient Database during 2020. Hospitalizations ≥ 18 years of age for COVID-19 were included. Cox proportional hazards with mixed effects were used for associations between race and in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression was used for the association between race and ICU admission. Among 87,934 COVID-19 hospitalizations, majority were Hispanics (56.5%), followed by White (27.3%), Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American (9.9%), and Black (6.3%). Cox regression showed higher mortality risk among Hispanics, compared to Whites (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI 0.87-0.96), Blacks (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.94), and Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.95). Logistic regression showed that the odds of ICU admission were significantly higher among Hispanics, compared to Whites (OR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.67-1.74), Blacks (OR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.64-1.78), and Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American (OR, 1.82; 95% CI 1.76-1.89). We found significant disparities in mortality among COVID-19 hospitalizations in California. Hispanics were the worst affected with the highest mortality and ICU admission rates.

The Impact of Patients' Primary Language on Inpatient Gastrointestinal Bleeding Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of English proficiency on gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) outcomes remains unclear. In this analysis, we compare inpatient GIB outcomes between patients with English as their primary language (EPL) and those with a primary language other than English (PLOE). METHODS: Using the 2019 State Inpatient Databases for New Jersey, Maryland, and Michigan, we created an analysis cohort of GIB hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Patients were stratified by primary language (EPL vs PLOE) and type of bleeding (variceal upper GI bleeding [VUGIB], nonvariceal upper GI bleeding [NVUGIB], and lower GI bleeding (LGIB)]. Regression analyses were used to compare mortality, 30-day readmissions, and length of stay. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the cohort, 5.5%-10% of the patients spoke a primary language other than English. Endoscopy utilization was lower among patients with PLOE vs EPL for NVUGIB (17.2% vs 21.2%, P < 0.001) and LGIB (26.3% vs 29.2%, P = 0.027). Patients with PLOE had higher odds of dying of VUGIB (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.16-2.48) and LGIB (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.22-2.12). Patients with PLOE were also more likely to be readmitted after NVUGIB (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.64-1.81). However, after controlling for the percentage of patients with PLOE discharged from each hospital, the disparities in mortality and readmissions were no longer detected. DISCUSSION: Disparities exist in GIB outcomes among patients with PLOE, but these gaps narrow at hospitals with higher percentages of patients with PLOE. Cultural and linguistic competence may improve outcomes in this vulnerable group.

Healthcare expenditure trends among adult stroke patients in the United States, 2011-2020.

BACKGROUND: In the US, between 2018 and 2019, approximately $57 billion were expended on stroke and related conditions. The aim of this study was to understand trends in direct healthcare expenditures among stroke patients using novel cost estimation methods and a nationally representative database. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 193,003 adults, ≥18 years of age, using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey during 2009-2016. Manning and Mullahy's two-part model were used to calculate adjusted mean and incremental medical expenditures after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: The mean (Standard Deviation) direct annual healthcare expenditure among stroke patients was $16,979.0 ($16,222.0- $17,736.0) and was nearly 3 times greater than non-stroke participants which were $5,039.7 ($4,951.0-$5,128.5) and were mainly spent on inpatient services, prescription medications, and office-based visits. Stroke patients had an additional healthcare expenditure of $4096.0 (3543.9, 4648.1) per person per year, compared to participants without stroke after adjusting for covariates (P<0.001). The total mean annual direct healthcare expenditure for stroke survivors increased from $16,142.0 (15,017.0-17,267.0) in 2007-2008 to $16,979.0 (16,222.0-17,736.0) in 2015-2016. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that stroke survivors had significantly greater healthcare expenses, compared to non-stroke individuals, mainly due to higher expenditures on inpatient services, prescription drugs, and office visits. These findings are concerning because the prevalence of stroke is projected to increase due to aging population and increased survival rates.

Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalizations for Amyloid-Related Heart Failure.

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy is being increasingly recognized as an important cause of heart failure (HF). In this study, we looked at adverse outcomes in hospitalizations with amyloid-related HF. This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample data, collected from 2016 to 2019. Patients ≥41 years of age and admitted for HF were included in the study. In these hospitalizations, amyloid-related HF was identified through the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for amyloidosis. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality, whereas secondary outcomes were prolonged length of stay, mechanical ventilation, mechanical circulatory support, vasopressors use, and dispositions other than home. From 2016 to 2019, there were 4,705,274 HF hospitalizations, of which 16,955 (0.4%) had amyloid cardiomyopathy. In all HF hospitalizations, amyloid-related increased from 0.26% in 2016 to 0.46% in 2019 (relative increase, 76.9%, P for trend <0.001). Amyloid-related HF hospitalizations were more common in older, male, and Black patients. The odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11 to 1.38), prolonged hospital length (OR, 1.61; 95% CI: 1.49 to 1.73) and vasopressors use (OR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.05) were significantly higher for amyloid-related hospitalizations. Amyloid-related HF hospitalizations are increasing substantially and are associated with adverse hospital outcomes. These hospitalizations were disproportionately higher for older, male, and Black patients. Amyloid-related HF is rare and underdiagnosed yet has several adverse outcomes. Hence, healthcare providers should be watchful of this condition for early identification and prompt management.

Characterization of Physical Function and Cancer-Related Physical Impairments in Hispanic Women With Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Study.

Introduction: This study reports characteristics of Hispanic women with breast cancer with respect to physical function, body mass index (BMI), and depression. Methods: This retrospective study included 322 Hispanic women with breast cancer. Physical function and fatigue were assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) short form and PROMIS-Fatigue (PROMISE-F) short form. In addition, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, sit to stand in 30 s (STS30) test, four-stage balance test (4SB), and grip strength (GS) were measured. Depression was identified using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2 and extracted from medical chart. Results: Nearly 40.8% were obese, and 20.8% had depression. Compared to normal BMI patients, mean PROMIS-F score was significantly higher among overweight and obese patients. The mean STS30 score was significantly lower in obese patients, compared to normal BMI patients. Regression analysis showed that the odds of depression were higher with increasing TUG and lower PROMIS-F, STS30, and GS. Conclusion: Hispanic women with breast cancer have substantial loss of physical function, and this is exaggerated if they are obese, overweight, or depressed. Clinicians caring for this population should screen them for the presence of loss of physical function, BMI, and depression.

Effect of Frailty on Hospital Outcomes Among Pediatric Cancer Patients in the United States: Results From the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Studies on frailty among pediatric patients with cancer are scarce. In this study, we sought to understand the effects of frailty on hospital outcomes in pediatric patients with cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study used data collected and stored in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2005 and 2014. These were hospitalized patients and hence represented the sickest group of patients. Frailty was measured using the frailty definition diagnostic indicator by Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups. RESULTS: Of 187,835 pediatric cancer hospitalizations included in this analysis, 11,497 (6.1%) were frail. The average hospitalization costs were $86,910 among frail and $40,358 for nonfrail patients. In propensity score matching analysis, the odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.71-2.52) and length of stay (odds ratio, 3.76; 95% CI, 3.46-4.09) were significantly greater for frail patients. The findings of our study suggest that frailty is a crucial clinical factor to be considered when treating pediatric cancer patients in a hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need for further research on frailty-based risk stratification and individualized interventions that could improve outcomes in frail pediatric cancer patients. The adaptation and validation of a frailty-defining diagnostic tool in the pediatric population is a high priority in the field.

Comparison of Inpatient Outcomes Between HIV Positive and Negative Hospitalizations for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Treatment among Lymphoid Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidity burden is higher among people living with HIV (PLWH). In addition, they experience adverse effects associated with antiretrovirals. In this study we looked for differences in adverse hospital outcomes between those with and without HIV among hospitalizations for autologous stem cell transplantations (ASCTs) for lymphoid malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study was a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, for the years 2005 to 2014. Adult hospitalizations ≥18 years of age, for ASCTs were included for the analysis, and were stratified into those with and without HIV. The primary outcome variables were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, and adverse dispositions. RESULTS: We included a total of 117,686 ASCT hospitalizations, of which, 468 (0.4%) were HIV positive. Among HIV-positive hospitalizations, there were 251 (53.4%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 128 (27.4%), Hodgkin lymphoma, and 89 (19.2%) multiple myeloma cases. Only half of the PLWH among Black population received ASCT, compared to Whites (26.8% vs. 54.8%). Regression analyses showed that the odds of in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.13-4.44), prolonged length of stay (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.67-2.11), and dispositions other than home (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.61-2.59) did not differ significantly between 2 groups. DISCUSSION: We found that adverse hospital outcomes did not differ between those with and without HIV among hospitalized autologous stem cell transplant recipients. However, the rates of ASCT were substantially lower among Black PLWH. New interventions and approaches should be developed to improve ASCT rates among HIV positive racial minorities.

A nationwide study of liver disease hospitalizations during the coronavirus pandemic in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The impact of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patients with liver disease is not well described at the population level in the United States. We used the largest, nationwide inpatient dataset to describe inpatient liver disease outcomes in the United States during the first year of the pandemic (2020) using 2018 and 2019 as comparator years. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (2018-2020), we explored year-to-year and 2020 month-to-month trends in hospitalizations, length of stay, and inpatient mortality for liver-related complications including cirrhosis, alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) and alcoholic hepatitis using regression modeling. We reported relative change (RC) in the study period. RESULTS: Decompensated cirrhosis hospitalizations decreased in 2020 compared with 2019 (RC: -2.7%, P < 0.001) while all-cause mortality increased by 15.5% (P < 0.001). Hospitalizations for ALD increased compared with pre-pandemic years (RC: 9.2%, P < 0.001) with a corresponding increase in mortality in 2020 (RC 25.2%, P = 0.002). We observed an increase in liver transplant surgery mortality during the peak months of the pandemic. Importantly, mortality from COVID-19 was higher among patients with decompensated cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.53-1.94]), Native Americans (OR 1.76, 95% CI [1.53-2.02]), and patients from lower socioeconomic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhosis hospitalizations decreased in 2020 compared with pre-pandemic years but were associated with higher all-cause mortality rates particularly in the peak months of the COVID-19 pandemic. In-hospital COVID-19 mortality was higher among Native Americans, patients with decompensated cirrhosis, chronic illnesses, and those from lower socioeconomic groups.