RESUMO
PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature regarding the biomechanical properties of different repair techniques and fixation methods for vertically oriented meniscal tears. METHODS: Human cadaveric studies evaluating the biomechanical properties of different repair techniques for vertically oriented meniscal tears were identified using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health databases. Primary outcomes included load to failure, displacement, stiffness, peak contact pressure, and contact area of repaired menisci. Repair techniques from included studies were reclassified into a total of 19 distinct all-inside (AI), inside-out (IO), or outside-in (OI) techniques. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included (420 total menisci). Contact pressure and area were restored to intact-state values across all 5 compressive load studies at low knee flexion angles but not at greater knee flexion angles (i.e., >60°). There were no significant differences in contact pressure or area between AI, IO, and OI techniques across all studies. Some studies demonstrated statistically significant advantages in tensile properties with IO techniques when compared with AI techniques, whereas others found AI techniques to be superior. No studies directly compared tensile properties of OI techniques with those of AI or IO techniques. Vertical mattress suture configurations resulted in significantly greater load to failure and decreased displacement compared with horizontal mattress configurations in 67% of studies comparing the 2 techniques. There was no difference in the rate of tissue failure in AI (66.97%), IO (60.38%), or OI (66.67%, χ2 = 0.83, P = .66) techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Contact mechanics are reliably restored after repair of vertical meniscal tears at low flexion angles but inconsistently restored at greater flexion angles, regardless of technique. Vertical mattress configurations outperformed horizontal mattress configurations under tensile load. There are conflicting data regarding the comparison of tensile properties between AI and IO techniques. Ultimately, neither AI, IO, nor OI repair demonstrated superior biomechanical properties in the present literature. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Several repair techniques demonstrate favorable biomechanical properties for vertical meniscal tears under tensile and compressive loads. Neither AI, IO, nor OI repair techniques demonstrate superior biomechanical properties at this time.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) of the hip and knee are common orthopaedic procedures. Postoperative pain in TJA is managed with opioids, which carry notable adverse effects and are associated with high dependency rates. With newer multimodal pain control regimens, perioperative glucocorticoid administration has shown promise as a means of mitigating postoperative pain. The objective of this review was to identify the effects of perioperative intravenous glucocorticoid administration on postoperative outcomes in TJA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was done. The EMBASE database was searched from inception through September 1, 2020, to identify studies of perioperative glucocorticoids in TJA. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, postoperative opioid utilization, antiemetic rescue medication use, and postoperative surgical complications. RESULTS: Our search yielded 429 publications; 14 studies were ultimately included, incorporating 1704 patients. In 13 of 14 studies, pain scores improved with perioperative steroid administration. Regarding postoperative nausea and vomiting, most of the studies found a notable association between steroids and improved VAS-N (visual analogue scale for nausea) and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence. There were inconclusive data on the effects of perioperative steroids regarding postoperative length of stay, fatigue, and range of motion of the affected joint. In all 14 studies, no notable difference was found between study groups regarding postoperative surgical complications. CONCLUSION: This systematic review supports the use of perioperative steroids in TJA for mitigating postoperative pain, nausea, and systemic inflammation. Additional randomized trials are needed to form a consensus on optimal dosing, delivery method, and timing of perioperative glucocorticoids in TJA.
