Effect of CURES Legislation on Narcotic Prescriptions After Soft-tissue Hand Surgery.

California's Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES) was mandated in 2018 to monitor and limit opiate prescriptions. This study evaluated the effects of this legislation on postoperative opioid prescriptions of patients undergoing soft tissue hand surgery. Patients receiving carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, and ganglion excisions 18 months prior to and 18 months after CURES were selected. The primary outcome was milligram morphine equivalent (MME) prescribed at the surgical encounter and at first postoperative visit. There were 758 patients in the pre-CURES cohort and 701 patients in the post-CURES cohort. In the pre-CURES cohort, there was 116.9 ± 123.8 MME prescribed post op and 10.2 ± 70.8 at first follow-up, whereas post-CURES had 58.8 ± 68.4 MME and 1.1 ± 14.1 for post-op and first follow-up respectively. Findings of this study indicate state regulations may play a role in reducing narcotic consumption following soft tissue hand surgery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):122-124, 2024).

A Look Into How the "Blue Zone" Lifestyle May Affect Patients' Lives Before and After Hip Fracture: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are life-changing injuries with associated one-year mortality up to 30%. Five locations in the world have been termed "blue zones," where the longevity of the population is markedly higher than that of surrounding areas and there are 10 times more centenarians. The United States has one blue zone (Loma Linda, California), which is believed to be because of the lifestyle of the Seventh-day Adventist population living there. We hypothesized that patients from the blue zone experience low-energy, frailty-driven, osteoporotic hip fractures later in life and an increased postinjury longevity relative to non-blue zone control subjects. METHODS: A review of patients treated for hip fracture between January 2010 and August 2020 from a single institution was conducted. Demographic data were collected, and the end point of mortality was assessed using death registry information, queried in April 2024. Groups were divided into blue zone and non-blue zone. Statistical analysis was conducted with P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 1,032 patients. The blue zone cohort sustained low-energy hip fractures 12 years later in life (83.2 versus 71.1, P < 0.01). Propensity score matching was used to account for this difference. After propensity score matching, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, surgery performed, sex, mechanism, ethnicity, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CHF, chronic kidney disease grade, dementia, surgical time, and drug/tobacco/marijuana use were similar between groups. Blue zone patients had lower mortality at both 1 and 2 years postoperatively (12% versus 24%, P = 0.03 and 20% versus 33%, P = 0.03, respectively), had more hypertension (76% versus 62%, P = 0.03), reported lower alcohol use (7% versus 20%, P < 0.01), and included more Seventh-day Adventists (64% versus 15%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The blue zone lifestyle affected the onset of frailty and delayed osteoporotic hip fracture by 12 years in this propensity-matched cohort study. Postoperative mortality was also markedly lower in the blue zone cohort.

Pelvic Ring Injuries: Stable or Not?

Pelvic ring injuries occur in varying severity and in vastly different patient demographics. Knowledge regarding which of these injuries require surgical intervention and which can be managed nonsurgically continues to evolve. Previous studies have shown validated criteria for sacral fractures and the posterior ring, explored the role of examination under anesthesia, and other forms of dynamic imaging. Although there is substantial information available, a comprehensive synthesis of this information is lacking. This article provides a comprehensive review of radiographic markers suggestive of stability, discusses treatment strategies, and proposes a treatment algorithm that is easily understood and applicable to not only those with a trauma background but also the general orthopaedic surgeon who will see these injuries frequently while on call.

The Effect of Upper Extremity Tourniquet Time on Postoperative Pain and Opiate Consumption.

BACKGROUND: There is widespread use of pneumatic tourniquet for both upper and lower extremity orthopedic surgeries. Tourniquet use improves visualization, decreases blood loss, and as a result, decreases operative time. Exceeding a certain amount of tourniquet time can cause lasting neuromuscular damage. Orthopedic procedures cause significant pain, and the perioperative narcotic prescriptions after orthopedic surgery have been identified as one of the major contributors to the opioid epidemic. Our aim was to determine whether increasing tourniquet time had a negative impact on immediate postoperative opiate usage in the upper extremity, and to determine other factors associated with increased immediate postoperative opiate usage. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was performed on patients who underwent volar pleading for fracture fixation between January 2014 and December 2019 at a single institution. Postoperative pain, morphine equivalent dose (MED) usage, and demographic variables were collected. Multivariable analysis was performed, with P < .05 considered significant. RESULTS: Immediate postoperative MED consumed was not correlated with operative time, tourniquet time, preoperative substance usage, or sex. However, postoperative MED consumed was correlated with preoperative narcotic use, high body mass index (BMI), and fracture surgery complexity. CONCLUSIONS: Tourniquet usage under current guidelines does not appear to have an effect on postoperative pain and narcotic usage. Preoperative narcotic usage, BMI, and surgery complexity are significant factors for postoperative opiate consumption.

Do All-terrain or Recreational Off-highway Vehicle Crashes Have a Higher Odds of Amputation?

BACKGROUND: Riding off-road vehicles is associated with the risk of injury to the extremities. There are two main types of four-wheel recreational off-road vehicles: quads or all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), which are essentially four-wheel off-road motorcycles, and recreational off-highway vehicles (ROVs), also colloquially referred to as utility terrain vehicles, which have side-by-side seating, higher maximum speeds, and a roll cage. There are multiple orthopaedic society position statements on ATVs, but none on ROVs. Perhaps this is because the injury patterns and differences between the two vehicles have not been elucidated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What patient, vehicle (ROVs versus ATVs), and injury factors are associated with amputation? (2) What are the anatomic location distributions of fractures and amputations by vehicle type? METHODS: Records of all patients in our hospital's billing system who had both a diagnostic code indicating an accident related to an off-road vehicle and one indicating an extremity or pelvic fracture between February 2014 and January 2020 were screened; this resulted in the identification of 328 patients with fractures resulting from off-road vehicle collisions. A total of 16% (51 of 328) of patients were excluded from the analysis because their injury did not involve either an ATV or an ROV; 277 patients were included in the final analysis. The following variables were collected: age at time of the injury, gender, BMI, vehicle type, Gustilo-Anderson type if applicable, amputation level if applicable, anatomic locations of injuries, ethanol level, and drug screen. ATV crashes accounted for 52% (145 of 277) of patients, and ROV crashes accounted for 48% (132 of 277). Patients from ATV crashes did not differ from those in ROV crashes in terms of mean age (24 ± 16 years versus 24 ± 13 years; p = 0.82), BMI (25 ± 7 kg/m 2 versus 26 ± 6 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.18), or gender (79% [114 of 145] men/boys versus 77% [102 of 132]; p = 0.79). Among patients who had a drug or ethanol screen, there was a higher percent of ATV riders who used marijuana (39% [19 of 49] versus 17% [7 of 42]; p = 0.04), but there were no differences in abnormal blood alcohol screen or abnormal nonmarijuana drug screen; however, these results were available in only about one-third of patients (99 of 277 for ethanol and 91 of 277 for drug screen). Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression analysis for factors associated with amputation, with p values < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: After controlling for differences in demographic factors, the stepwise increase in Gustilo-Anderson grade of open fracture (OR 9.8 [95% CI 3.6 to 27.0]; p < 0.001) and ROV vehicle type (OR 15.7 [95% CI 3.6 to 68.5]; p < 0.001) were both associated with amputation. There was no increase in the odds of amputation associated with age (OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.9 to 1.1]; p = 0.81), gender (OR 1.4 [95% CI 0.3 to 5.8]; p = 0.68), or BMI (OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9 to 1.2]; p = 0.37). The most frequent ATV fractures occurred in the forearm and wrist (22% [45 of 203]), whereas most ROV injuries occurred through the metacarpals (41% [107 of 262] of fractures and 58% [18 of 31] of amputations). CONCLUSION: ROV crashes are associated with a higher odds of amputation when compared with ATV crashes. Because most ROV injuries were in the forearm and below, this likely occurs when upper extremities are crushed and mangled under the roll cage in rollover ROV crashes. Because of this danger, we urge our orthopaedic societies to either update current ATV position statements to include ROVs or release separate statements on ROVs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Do Current Stability Scores After MPFL Reconstruction Correlate With Patient Satisfaction Postoperatively?

Background: Patellar dislocation can lead to instability, pain, limited function, and recurrent dislocations. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction leads to favorable patient reported outcomes, but many patients fail to return to previous activity levels. The purpose of this study is to determine how well patients do after MPFL reconstruction and to determine the most important factors for evaluation of patellar instability following MPFL reconstruction. Methods: After IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction from January 2006 to January 2014 by two board-certified sports orthopaedic surgeons. Patients were then contacted to complete a follow-up questionnaire about satisfaction, functional status, pain, and patellar stability. Patients with at least one-year of follow-up data, a complete data set, and a completed questionnaire were included in the final analysis. Charts of 100 patients were reviewed and 54 patients met all criteria for inclusion in the study. Chi-square analysis, t-tests, and multivariate and univariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of multiple variables on return to activity, satisfaction, and function while controlling for covariates with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: When asked about subluxation, 20% (11/54) reported recurrent patellar subluxation (without re-dislocation). Of the 11 patients who reported re-subluxation, 54% (6/11) reported being highly satisfied (rating of 9-10/10) with the outcome of their knee. Of the 54 patients, 54% (29/54) did not return to previous levels of activity, nevertheless, 31% (9/29) of these 29 patients reported being highly satisfied with the outcome of their knee. Conclusion: Patients report high levels of satisfaction even if they have recurrent instability or are unable to return to prior activity levels. Current scoring systems do not accurately depict patients' post-operative outcomes after MPFL Reconstruction. Level of Evidence: III.

Diffuse Recalcitrant Osteomyelitis and Joint Septicemia Because of Bowel Perforation Secondary to Gunshot Injury: A Case Report.

CASE: A previously healthy 22-year-old man was brought into the emergency department after sustaining a low-velocity, civilian gunshot wound to the abdomen that perforated the bowel. Over the next 300 days, he would be admitted and discharged multiple times, requiring a total of 48 debridements, 23 different antimicrobials in 81 unique combinations, and had 18 different microbes cultured from various sites in bone, joint, and blood. Multiorganism bacteremia and fungemia culminated in above-knee amputation because of progression of infection, all in a nonimmunocompromised host. CONCLUSION: Despite following clinical guidelines, patients can still fail evidence-based treatment algorithms. A humbling reminder is that medicine is never one-size-fits-all.

Anatomic Analysis of a Percutaneous Fixation Technique for the Posterior Malleolus Using Posterior-to-Anterior-Directed Cannulated Screws: A Cadaveric Study and Technique Description.

BACKGROUND: Posterior malleolus fractures are traditionally managed with open reduction and internal fixation or percutaneous anterior-to-posterior screws. We present a third option using a percutaneous technique for the placement of posterior-to-anterior-directed screws. An anatomic safety analysis is done using cadaveric specimens. METHODS: Using 15 embalmed specimens (10 F and 5 M), a guidewire was placed using the described technique. The posterolateral ankle was dissected to evaluate for damage to vulnerable structures including the sural nerve, peroneal artery, and flexor hallucis longus/flexor digitorum longus/peroneal/Achilles tendons. The distance from the sural nerve and peroneal artery was measured to the guidewire at its nearest point. The tendons were evaluated for traumatic piercings. RESULTS: The sural nerve had a mean distance to wire of 5.3 mm (range 0 to 12) and the peroneal artery had a mean distance to wire of 5.7 mm (range 2 to 13 mm) with no traumatic piercings of either structure. The flexor hallucis longus/flexor digitorum longus/peroneal/Achilles tendons had no traumatic piercings. CONCLUSION: This percutaneous technique provides a safe alternative to the standard open and traditional percutaneous techniques. It has limited application and is suitable for noncomminuted minimally displaced posterior malleolus fractures and those with fragile tissues where the morbidity of the soft tissue exposure outweighs the benefit of an open reduction.

Virtual Reality Neurorehabilitation for Mobility in Spinal Cord Injury: A Structured Review.

Objective: The goal of this review was to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of virtual reality (VR) therapy for improvement of mobility in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases in April 2018. The phrase "virtual reality" and a combination of "spinal cord injury," "tetraplegia," "quadriplegia," or "paraplegia" were used as search terms. References included selected articles were reviewed as well. Articles were filtered based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) written in English, 2) peer-reviewed, 3) VR used for patients with SCI, and 4) changes in motor function evaluated. Main outcome measurements: Common outcomes of mobility assessment used in the studies included the Functional Reach Test (FRT), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Limit of Stability (LOS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II) scale. Results: Seven of the nine reviewed articles were case series, while two were randomized, controlled trials. Reviewed literature demonstrated significant benefit in FRT, BBS, gait speed, muscle strength, SCIM, and WISCI-II using VR therapy. Voluntary muscle control improvement was also observed. However, no significant differences were found with regard to finehand motor movement. Conclusion: This literature review demonstrated mostly positive outcomes for the use of VR for SCI rehabilitation but were limited in quality and scope. Larger, multicenter trials are still needed.