Large variance in a lateral osteoarthritic population prior to and following lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty: An analysis of knee phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: Disagreement exists on the optimal coronal alignment target for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). An improved understanding of the distribution of coronal alignment and joint line orientation in lateral osteoarthritis (OA) might prove beneficial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pre- and postoperative Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) distribution following lateral UKA and to evaluate the association between phenotypic variation and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: A surgeon's registry was retrospectively reviewed between 2012 and 2022 to identify patients who received primary lateral UKA for advanced, lateral compartment OA. Radiographic measurements were performed, and CPAK phenotypes were determined. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala, and patient satisfaction were analyzed at one-year and two-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 305 knees were included. Preoperatively, seven phenotypes were observed and CPAK3 (54.1%) was most commonly observed. Postoperatively, all nine phenotypes were observed and CPAK6 (32.8%) was predominant. Preoperatively, 23.6% did not have a prearthritic valgus alignment. No significant differences in PROMs were found between individual phenotypes or between preserved and altered phenotypes. CONCLUSION: Coronal alignment and joint line orientation were highly variable within a lateral compartment OA cohort. However, no association was demonstrated between superior postoperative PROMs and phenotype variation or phenotype preservation, which might suggest that there is not one universal optimal alignment target. Interestingly, 23.6% of knees with lateral compartment OA did not have a prearthritic valgus alignment, which may have been affected by joint line orientation.

Robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to high implant survival and patient satisfaction at mean 10-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of literature reporting on long-term outcomes following robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study assessed the long-term survivorship, patient-reported satisfaction and pain scores following robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A single surgeon's database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA with a cemented, fixed-bearing prosthesis prior to May 2015. Patients were contacted to determine implant survivorship, satisfaction and pain. Kaplan-Meier models were applied to analyse survival. RESULTS: A total of 77 knees (70 patients) with a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 1.5 years (range: 8.1-13.3) were included. Five knees were revised, corresponding to a 10-year survivorship of 96.1% and estimated survival time of 12.7 ± 0.3 years (95% confidence interval: 12.2-13.2) with all-cause revision as the endpoint. Unexplained pain (40.0%) and progression of OA (40.0%) in contralateral compartments were the most reported reasons for revision. Among patients without revision, 94.4% were either satisfied or very satisfied with their lateral UKA and the average pain score was 1.1. CONCLUSION: Robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA led to high implant survivorship and patient satisfaction, and low pain scores at long-term follow-up. Progression of OA in contralateral compartments and unexplained pain were the most frequent reasons for revision. These findings support the continued use of robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment OA; however, its clinical value over conventional techniques remains to be established in prospective comparative studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV.

The phenotypic diversity of anteromedial osteoarthritis before and after treatment with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A radiographic analysis of 1000 knees.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess phenotypic variation in the coronal plane of knees with anteromedial osteoarthritis using the functional knee phenotype classification, before and after treatment with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: The study comprised 1000 knees of 835 patients (45% females, 55% males, 90% Caucasian) who underwent medial UKA for anteromedial osteoarthritis. Pre and postoperative alignment was evaluated through the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA), and tibial mechanical angle (TMA). Knees were classified according to the functional knee phenotype system which combines limb phenotype (HKA), and femoral and tibial knee phenotypes (FMA and TMA, respectively). Restoration of prearthritic coronal alignment following medial UKA was evaluated by phenotype. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 76 distinct and 25 relevant (prevalence ≥1%) functional knee phenotypes were identified, of which VARHKA 6°VARFMA 3°NEUTMA 0° was the most common (9.4% of knees). The most prevalent limb phenotype, VARHKA 6°, comprised 15 distinct knee phenotypes (FMA and TMA combinations). Postoperatively, 58 distinct and 17 relevant functional knee phenotypes were observed, of which VARHKA 3°NEUFMA 0°NEUTMA 0° had the highest prevalence at 18.3%. Knees with combined tibial and femoral deformities were associated with a lower probability of restoration of prearthritic coronal alignment following medial UKA, compared to knees without extra-articular deformity, or knees with an isolated tibial or femoral deformity. CONCLUSION: Phenotype analysis using the functional knee phenotype system demonstrated a wide diversity of coronal alignment phenotypes among knees with anteromedial osteoarthritis in a predominantly Caucasian population. Following medial UKA, a reduction from 25 preoperative to 17 postoperative relevant phenotypes was observed. Consideration of phenotypic variation can be of importance when aiming to restore prearthritic coronal alignment during medial UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Restoration or relative overcorrection of pre-arthritic coronal alignment leads to improved results following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: A pre-arthritic alignment strategy for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) aims to restore a patient's native lower limb alignment which may translate into improved outcomes. This study aimed to assess whether patients with pre-arthritically aligned knees versus patients with non-pre-arthritically aligned knees demonstrated improved mid-term outcomes and survivorship following medial UKA. The hypothesis was that pre-arthritic alignment in medial UKA would lead to better postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study of 537 robotic-assisted fixed-bearing medial UKA was conducted. During this procedure, the surgical goal was to restore pre-arthritic alignment guided by re-tensioning of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). For study purposes, coronal alignment was retrospectively evaluated using the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA). Pre-arthritic alignment was estimated through the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) algorithm. Knees were grouped according to the difference between postoperative mHKA and estimated pre-arthritic alignment (i.e., mHKA - aHKA) as Group 1 (pre-arthritically aligned: mHKA restored within 2.0° of the aHKA), Group 2 (mHKA > 2.0° overcorrected relative to the aHKA), or Group 3 (mHKA > 2.0° undercorrected relative to the aHKA). Outcomes included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), Kujala, proportions of knees achieving the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for these scores, and survivorship. PASS thresholds for KOOS, JR and Kujala were determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve method. RESULTS: A total of 369 knees were categorized as Group 1, 107 as Group 2, and 61 as Group 3. At 4.4 ± 1.6 years follow-up, mean KOOS, JR was comparable among groups, while Kujala was significantly worse in Group 3. The proportion of knees achieving the PASS for Kujala (76.5 points) was lower in Group 3 (n = 32; 59%) compared to Group 1 (n = 260; 74%) (p = 0.02). 5-year survivorship was higher in Group 1 and Group 2 (99% and 100%, respectively) compared to Group 3 (91%) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Pre-arthritically aligned knees and knees with relative overcorrection from their pre-arthritic alignment following medial UKA demonstrated improved mid-term outcomes and survivorship compared to knees with relative under correction from their pre-arthritic alignment. These results encourage restoring or relatively overcorrecting pre-arthritic alignment to optimize outcomes following medial UKA, and caution against under correction from the pre-arthritic alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores estimated pre-arthritic coronal limb alignment: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) aims to restore pre-arthritic (constitutional) limb alignment, by re-tensioning of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). This study aimed to determine whether pre-arthritic coronal alignment was restored following robotic-assisted medial UKA in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. METHOD: A retrospective study was undertaken, including 102 patients with a unilateral robotic-assisted medial UKA and a contralateral unaffected knee. Both the validated arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and alignment of the contralateral unaffected knee were used to estimate pre-arthritic alignment. The aHKA is a radiographic method to estimate the pre-arthritic mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA). To verify restoration of pre-arthritic alignment, postoperative mHKA was compared to the aHKA. Additionally, postoperative mHKA, joint line congruence (JLCA), and knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) angles were compared between the operative and contralateral unaffected knee. Equivalence between postoperative and pre-arthritic alignment was assessed through the two-one-sided t-test (TOST), using equivalence margins of ±2.0°. RESULTS: Postoperative mHKA was equivalent to the aHKA (mean difference -0.38°, 90% CI -0.69 to -0.07;p < .001), with 93 knees (91%) restored within 3.0° of their aHKA. Postoperative mHKA, JLCA and KJLO were equivalent between the operative and contralateral unaffected knees, with mean differences of -0.65°, -0.65°, and -0.40°, respectively; all p < .001. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative and pre-arthritic coronal alignment were equivalent following robotic-assisted medial UKA, with 91% of knees restored within 3.0° of their pre-arthritic mechanical axis. These results demonstrate that both mechanical alignment and joint line congruence are restored by MCL re-tensioning in patients undergoing robotic-assisted medial UKA for medial compartment osteoarthritis.

Successful same-day discharge in 88% of patients after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of day-case unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) by assessment of successful same-day discharge (SDD), readmission, complication and reoperation rates in the recent literature. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched to identify all eligible studies reporting outcomes of day-case UKA. Studies with intended same-day home discharge after UKA were included. A meta-analysis of proportions, using a random-effects model, was performed to estimate overall rates of successful SDD and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies including selected patients (i.e., patients had to meet certain patient-specific criteria to be eligible for day-case UKA) and unselected patients (i.e., no additional criteria for day-case UKA), as well as for clinical and registry-based studies. Additional outcomes included reasons for the failure of SDD and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies and 9694 patients were included with a mean age of 66 ± 9 years and mean follow-up of 59 days (mean range 30-270 days). Based on 24 studies (2733 patients), the overall successful SDD rate was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80-92). These rates were 91% (95% CI 84-95) across studies with selected patients and 76% (95% CI 55-89) across studies with unselected patients. Overall readmission, complication and reoperation rates were 3% (95% CI 1.9-4.4), 4% (95% CI 2.8-5.2) and 1% (95% CI 0.8-1.3), respectively. Inability to mobilize, nausea and uncontrolled pain were frequently reported reasons for failed SDD. The overall patient satisfaction rate was 94%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review with meta-analysis found an overall successful SDD rate of 88% after UKA in a heterogeneous cohort of selected and unselected patients. Readmission, complication and reoperation rates suggest UKA can be performed safely and effectively as a same-day discharge procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.