Is High-Risk Sexual Behavior a Risk Factor for Oropharyngeal Cancer?

(1) Background: Several lines of evidence established a link between high-risk (HR) sexual behavior (SB), the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in saliva, and the presence of oncogenic HR-HPV subtypes in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). A highly influential case-control study by D'Souza et al. comparing OPSCC patients and ENT patients with benign diseases (hospital controls) established HR-SB as a putative etiological risk factor for OPSCC. Aiming to replicate their findings in a nested case-control study of OPSCC patients and propensity score (PS)-matched unaffected controls from a large population-based German cohort study, we here demonstrate discrepant findings regarding HR-SB in OPSCC. (2) Methods: According to the main risk factors for HNSCC (age, sex, tobacco smoking, and alcohol consumption) PS-matched healthy controls invited from the population-based cohort study LIFE and HNSCC (including OPSCC) patients underwent interviews, using AUDIT and Fagerström, as well as questionnaires asking for SB categories as published. Afterwards, by newly calculating PSs for the same four risk factors, we matched each OPSCC patient with two healthy controls and compared responses utilizing chi-squared tests and logistic regression. (3) Results: The HNSCC patients and controls showed significant differences in sex distribution, chronologic age, tobacco-smoking history (pack years), and alcohol dependence (based on AUDIT score). However, PS-matching decreased the differences between OPSCC patients and controls substantially. Despite confirming that OPSCC patients were more likely to self-report their first sexual intercourse before age 18, we found no association between OPSCC and HR-SB, neither for practicing oral-sex, having an increased number of oral- or vaginal-sex partners, nor for having casual sex or having any sexually transmitted disease. (4) Conclusions: Our data, by showing a low prevalence of HR-SB in OPSCC patients, confirm findings from other European studies that differ substantially from North American case-control studies. HR-SB alone may not add excess risk for developing OPSCC.

Sudden vision loss and neurological deficits after facial hyaluronic acid filler injection.

BACKGROUND: The ongoing expansion of the cosmetic armamentarium of facial rejuvenation fails to uncover the inherent risks of cosmetic interventions. Informed consent to all risks of cosmetic filler injections and potential sequelae, including ocular and neurological complications, should be carefully ensured. We present two cases of complications following facial hyaluronic acid filler injections. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Case 1: A 43-year-old woman presented with monocular vision loss of the left eye, associated ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, periocular pain and nausea, cutaneous changes of the glabella region and forehead, and sensory impairment in the left maxillary branch dermatome (V2) after receiving a hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injection into the left glabellar area. On ophthalmological examination, an ophthalmic artery occlusion (OAO) was diagnosed upon identification of a "cherry-red spot". Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a left ischemic optic neuropathy. Supportive therapy and hyaluronidase injections were initiated. A follow-up MRI of the head performed two months after presentation corresponded to stable MRI findings. The patient had irreversible and complete vision loss of the left eye, however, the ptosis resolved. Case 2: A 29-year-old woman was admitted to hospital a few hours after a rhinoplasty and cheek augmentation with hyaluronic acid, presenting with acute monocular vision loss in the right eye, retrobulbar pain, fatigue and vomiting. In addition, the patient presented a harbinger of impending skin necrosis and a complete oculomotor nerve palsy on the right side, choroidal ischemia and vision impairment. Supportive treatment and hyaluronidase injections into the ischemic tissue were initiated. A small scar at the tip of the nose, vision impairment and an irregular pupillary margin on the right side persisted at follow-up. CONCLUSION: These two case reports and the literature review emphasize the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to potentially devastating complications. In order to reduce the risk of vision loss secondary to cosmetic filler injections, practitioners should possess a thorough knowledge of anatomy and preventive strategies.

[68Ga-]PSMA-11 PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for gross tumor volume delineation in a slice by slice analysis with whole mount histopathology as a reference standard - Implications for focal radiotherapy planning in primary prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Focal therapies are a promising approach to treat prostate cancer (PCa) more precisely instead of conventional whole gland treatment. Nowadays, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is routinely used for gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. The aim of our study was to compare PSMA-PET/CT and mpMRI for the delineation of intraprostatic tumor burden by using whole mount histopathology as a reference standard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 17 prospectively enrolled patients with primary PCa underwent [68Ga-]PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI before radical prostatectomy. PSMA-PET/CT, mpMRI and histopathology of the resected specimens were co-registered. Two teams of experts generated GTV contours for mpMRI and PET, respectively. The imaging was validated on a lesion level and slice by slice in quadrants based on the distribution of PCa in histopathology. Overall, 772 quadrants were analyzed with 414 being true positive for tumor (53.6%). RESULTS: Median tumor volumes were 10.4 ml for GTV-histo, 10.8 ml for PSMA-PET and 4.5 ml for mpMRI. Median tumor volume in mpMRI was significant (p < 0.05) smaller than GTV-PET and GTV-histo, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 87% for PSMA-PET, 58% and 94% for mpMRI and 91% and 84% for their GTV-union. In 133 quadrants PSMA-PET/CT correctly identified tumor where mpMRI found none. MpMRI identified 19 true positive quadrants exclusively. CONCLUSION: Our investigation demonstrates an increased consensus of PSMA-PET with histopathology compared to mpMRI for intraprostatic GTV delineation, especially with a higher sensitivity. Additionally mpMRI contours underestimate tumor volume significantly. Thus PSMA-PET may be a complementary augmentation for GTV delineation in focal therapies.