Optimised surgery (so-called TME surgery) and high-resolution MRI in the planning of treatment of rectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Since November 1998, we have applied the concept of total mesorectal excision (TME) to rectal carcinoma together with a standardised pathological quality assessment. Participation in the European MERCURY study [The MERCURY Study Group Radiology (in press), 2006] required us to establish the indication for neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy on the basis of an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. The aim of the present retrospective study is to evaluate the quality of the surgery, the efficacy of the MRI and the oncological outcomes achieved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2001 and October 2005, 68 out of 109 patients with carcinoma of the rectum were submitted to radical surgery in curative intent and 23/68 (34%) were given neoadjuvant therapy. In an interdisciplinary study group, each patient was evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively using standardised MRI and histopathological methods. RESULTS: The quality of surgery was established on the basis of the pathological examination of the surgical specimen. The rates of incomplete mesorectal excision, intra-operative tumour cell dissemination and positive circumferential margins were all low at 4%, 7% and 3%, respectively. The effectiveness of MRI proved to be greatest in predicting the tumour status at the circumferential resection margin: in the admittedly limited number of patients it proved possible to correctly predict the tumour status for every patient. The assessment of the anatomic extent of the primary tumour and of the regional lymph node metastasis according to the TNM system, in contrast, was considerably less successful at 73% and 75%, and 37% and 57%, respectively. CONCLUSION: By applying the TME concept and MRI-based therapy planning, excellent results can be achieved and, at the same time, the number of patients requiring neoadjuvant treatment is considerably reduced.

Randomized trial with early-stage Hodgkin's disease testing 30 Gy vs. 40 Gy extended field radiotherapy alone.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether or not a total dose (TD) of 30 Gy is sufficient for treatment of assumed subclinical Hodgkin's Disease compared to 40 Gy TD with early stage Hodgkin's Disease (ESHD). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective multicenter trial, 376 patients with laparotomy-proven ESHD stages PS IA to PS IIB without risk factors such as large mediastinum, massive splenic involvement, extranodal disease, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and/or three or more involved lymph node areas were randomly allocated either to receive (ARM A) 40 Gy TD extended field-radiotherapy (EF-RT) or (ARM B) 30 Gy TD EF-RT plus 10 Gy TD involved field-radiotherapy (IF-RT), both arms without any chemotherapy. Three hundred sixty-six of these patients were evaluable for early and long-term response, such as remission status, freedom from treatment failure (FFTF), and overall survival (OAS). For quality control, all planning and verification films as well as dose charts were prospectively reviewed by a panel of four experts, all heads of a radiotherapy department, where protocol violations (PV) were seen either with regard to errors in treatment technique, treatment volume, in TD and/or in dose/time-relationship. RESULTS: Treatment resulted in a complete remission (CR) of 98%; in a 5-year FFTF of 76%, and a 5-year OAS of 97%. There was no difference between the two arms in favor of 40 Gy EF compared to 30 Gy EF regarding FFTF and OAS, without any in field relapse throughout the EF volumes. Expectedly, 5-years FFTF was significantly influenced by the quality of radiotherapeutical procedures: 70% with protocol violations (PV) vs. 82% without PV. CONCLUSION: Subclinical involvement in ESHD without risk factors is sufficiently treated by a TD of 30 Gy without chemotherapy, leading to a 5-years FFTF of 82% and a 5-year OAS of 97% in a multicenter treatment setting, where quality assurance is mandatory.

Further chemotherapy versus low-dose involved-field radiotherapy as consolidation of complete remission after six cycles of alternating chemotherapy in patients with advance Hodgkin's disease. German Hodgkins' Study Group (GHSG).

OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this prospective randomized multicenter study to compare chemotherapy and radiotherapy as consolidation treatments in patients achieving complete remission (CR) after 6 cycles of doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy in advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease (HD). METHODS: A total of 288 previously untreated patients aged 18-60 years with stage IIIB or IV HD received induction chemotherapy with 3 X (COPP + ABVD). Patients achieving CR were eligible for randomisation to either 20 Gy radiotherapy to initially involved fields (RT-arm) or to an additional 1 X (Copp + ABVD) (CT-arm ). Patients with nodal PR were allocated to more intense radiotherapy (IRT-arm: 20 Gy IF, 40 Gy to persisting tumor). Four patients with persisting organ involvement after induction received salvage chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 288 patients, 171 (59%) achieved CR after induction chemotherapy. Of these, 100 patients were successfully randomized to RT or CT. In the CT arm relapses were observed on 10 of 49 patients compared with 13 of 51 patients in the RT arm (p = n.s.). Fifty patients refused randomisation and for them a treatment was chosen, and 21 patients refused any further treatment. Of these 21 patients with no consolidation therapy, 9 relapsed, indicating an approximately 3-fold increased relapse risk compared with those receiving either of the consolidation therapies. No relapse was observed in initially involved lung or liver sites. Adverse prognostic factors for freedom from treatment failure and survival were low hemoglobin and large mediastinal mass at initial presentation. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences in treatment efficacy were detected between 20 Gy IF radiotherapy and 1X (COPP + ABVD) chemotherapy following CR after six cycles of alternating chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage HD. However, limited observations in a non-randomized cohort indicate that patients without consolidation treatment of CR after 6 cycles of chemotherapy may have an elevated risk of relapse.