Advances in follow-up techniques for implantable defibrillators.

The complexity of newer implantable defibrillators has made device follow-up increasingly more intricate. Extensive data-logging capacity provides specific information on recorded events, which facilitates more accurate determination of patient arrhythmias. This helps the clinician judge whether the device is detecting and treating arrhythmias appropriately, or whether false sensing of external signals or supraventricular rhythms is occurring. There is also a record of the efficacy of delivered therapy from the device that helps in optimizing subsequent programming. Programming itself has become much more complicated, with multiple independently programmable therapy zones, each with numerous available therapeutic modalities. In addition, defibrillator status information has been improved. Accurate battery voltage measurements give a reasonable estimate of remaining device life, and pace/sense and shock lead impedances can be measured to provide information on total system integrity. Together, these advances allow more specific programming of the device to the individual patient's condition but require increasing experience and expertise of the physician.

Acute efficacy and chronic follow-up of patients with non-thoracotomy third generation implantable defibrillators.

Non-thoracotomy implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) has simplified the process of device insertion, promising to decrease associated procedural complications while providing sudden death protection at least equal to epicardial systems. This study presents the acute and chronic results of 110 patients who underwent attempted non-thoracotomy ICD implantation with the Medtronic Transvene lead system and PCD model 7217 or 7219. Of the 110 patients attempted, 100 (91%) had the system successfully implanted without the need for an epicardial patch. One patient died 1 week postoperatively of septic shock related to the implantation (0.9% perioperative mortality). During follow-up of 16 +/- 11 months, 45% of the patients had an event detected as ventricular tachycardia; 26% of these detections were felt clinically to be due to supraventricular rhythms. Of the remainder, 87% were successfully treated with the first VT therapy, and 98% were terminated by the final therapy; 66% of the patients had at least one episode of ventricular fibrillation, of which 5% were felt to be inappropriate detections; 85% of the appropriate episodes were successfully treated with the first VF therapy, and all were converted by the final therapy. Total mortality at 6, 12, and 24 months was 3%, 11%, and 19% respectively. Only one patient had sudden cardiac death, occurring at 13 months postimplant. Overall, the non-thoracotomy lead system for this ICD displayed infrequent implant complications and proved to be reliable at terminating arrhythmias and maintaining a low rate of sudden cardiac death in this high risk population.